ClinicalTrials.gov and Drugs@FDA: A Comparison of Results Reporting for New Drug Approval Trials

被引:40
|
作者
Schwartz, Lisa M.
Woloshin, Steven [2 ]
Zheng, Eugene [3 ]
Tse, Tony [1 ]
Zarin, Deborah A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Lib Med, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
[2] Dartmouth Inst, WTRB, Level 5,1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[3] 2900 Univ Ave Southeast,Apartment 306, Minneapolis, MN 55414 USA
关键词
RESULTS DATABASE; ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; PUBLICATION;
D O I
10.7326/M15-2658
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pharmaceutical companies and other trial sponsors must submit certain trial results to ClinicalTrials.gov. The validity of these results is unclear. Purpose: To validate results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov against publicly available U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews on Drugs@FDA. Data Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov (registry and results database) and Drugs@FDA (medical and statistical reviews). Study Selection: 100 parallel-group, randomized trials for new drug approvals (January 2013 to July 2014) with results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov (15 March 2015). Data Extraction: 2 assessors extracted, and another verified, the trial design, primary and secondary outcomes, adverse events, and deaths. Results: Most trials were phase 3 (90%), double-blind (92%), and placebo-controlled (73%) and involved 32 drugs from 24 companies. Of 137 primary outcomes identified from ClinicalTrials.gov, 134 (98%) had corresponding data at Drugs@FDA, 130 (95%) had concordant definitions, and 107 (78%) had concordant results. Most differences were nominal (that is, relative difference <10%). Primary outcome results in 14 trials could not be validated. Of 1927 secondary outcomes from ClinicalTrials.gov, Drugs@FDA mentioned 1061 (55%) and included results data for 367 (19%). Of 96 trials with 1 or more serious adverse events in either source, 14 could be compared and 7 had discordant numbers of persons experiencing the adverse events. Of 62 trials with 1 or more deaths in either source, 25 could be compared and 17 were discordant. Limitation: Unknown generalizability to uncontrolled or crossover trial results. Conclusion: Primary outcome definitions and results were largely concordant between ClinicalTrials. gov and Drugs@FDA. Half the secondary outcomes, as well as serious events and deaths, could not be validated because Drugs@FDA includes only "key outcomes" for regulatory decision making and frequently includes only adverse event results aggregated across multiple trials.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Depression clinical trials worldwide: a systematic analysis of the ICTRP and comparison with ClinicalTrials.gov
    Namiot, Eugenia D.
    Smirnovova, Diana
    Sokolov, Aleksandr V.
    Chubarev, Vladimir N.
    Tarasov, Vadim V.
    Schioth, Helgi B.
    TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [42] Reporting Discrepancies Between the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database and Peer-Reviewed Publications
    Hartung, Daniel M.
    Zarin, Deborah A.
    Guise, Jeanne-Marie
    McDonagh, Marian
    Paynter, Robin
    Helfand, Mark
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (07) : 477 - +
  • [43] Compliance with mandatory reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional study
    Prayle, Andrew P.
    Hurley, Matthew N.
    Smyth, Alan R.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
  • [44] Reporting Discrepancies Between the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database and Peer-Reviewed Publications
    Becker, Jessica E.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 161 (10) : 760 - 760
  • [45] Reporting of the safety from allergic rhinitis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and in publications: An observational study
    Paladin, Ivan
    Pranic, Shelly Melissa
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [46] Drug versus placebo randomized controlled trials in neonates: A review of ClinicalTrials.gov registry
    Desselas, Emilie
    Pansieri, Claudia
    Leroux, Stephanie
    Bonati, Maurizio
    Jacqz-Aigrain, Evelyne
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [47] Characteristics and Public Availability of Results of Clinical Trials on Rare Diseases Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov
    Dechartres, Agnes
    Riveros, Carolina
    Harroch, Michael
    Faber, Timor
    Ravaud, Philippe
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (04) : 556 - 558
  • [48] Reporting of the safety from allergic rhinitis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and in publications: An observational study
    Ivan Paladin
    Shelly Melissa Pranić
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22
  • [49] An Analysis of Sponsors/Collaborators of 69,160 Drug Trials Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov
    Keezhupalat, Shruthi Muralidharan
    Naik, Ankeet
    Gupta, Saurabh
    Srivatsan, Raghunathan
    Saberwal, Gayatri
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [50] Transgender people in clinical trials of drugs and biologics: An analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov from 2007 to 2023
    Schonrock, Zachary
    Brackeen, Sierra
    Delarose, Kikka E.
    Tran, Tiffany Q. -D.
    Cirrincione, Lauren R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 90 (10) : 2332 - 2342