ClinicalTrials.gov and Drugs@FDA: A Comparison of Results Reporting for New Drug Approval Trials

被引:40
|
作者
Schwartz, Lisa M.
Woloshin, Steven [2 ]
Zheng, Eugene [3 ]
Tse, Tony [1 ]
Zarin, Deborah A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Lib Med, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
[2] Dartmouth Inst, WTRB, Level 5,1 Med Ctr Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[3] 2900 Univ Ave Southeast,Apartment 306, Minneapolis, MN 55414 USA
关键词
RESULTS DATABASE; ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; PUBLICATION;
D O I
10.7326/M15-2658
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pharmaceutical companies and other trial sponsors must submit certain trial results to ClinicalTrials.gov. The validity of these results is unclear. Purpose: To validate results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov against publicly available U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews on Drugs@FDA. Data Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov (registry and results database) and Drugs@FDA (medical and statistical reviews). Study Selection: 100 parallel-group, randomized trials for new drug approvals (January 2013 to July 2014) with results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov (15 March 2015). Data Extraction: 2 assessors extracted, and another verified, the trial design, primary and secondary outcomes, adverse events, and deaths. Results: Most trials were phase 3 (90%), double-blind (92%), and placebo-controlled (73%) and involved 32 drugs from 24 companies. Of 137 primary outcomes identified from ClinicalTrials.gov, 134 (98%) had corresponding data at Drugs@FDA, 130 (95%) had concordant definitions, and 107 (78%) had concordant results. Most differences were nominal (that is, relative difference <10%). Primary outcome results in 14 trials could not be validated. Of 1927 secondary outcomes from ClinicalTrials.gov, Drugs@FDA mentioned 1061 (55%) and included results data for 367 (19%). Of 96 trials with 1 or more serious adverse events in either source, 14 could be compared and 7 had discordant numbers of persons experiencing the adverse events. Of 62 trials with 1 or more deaths in either source, 25 could be compared and 17 were discordant. Limitation: Unknown generalizability to uncontrolled or crossover trial results. Conclusion: Primary outcome definitions and results were largely concordant between ClinicalTrials. gov and Drugs@FDA. Half the secondary outcomes, as well as serious events and deaths, could not be validated because Drugs@FDA includes only "key outcomes" for regulatory decision making and frequently includes only adverse event results aggregated across multiple trials.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reporting of clinical trial safety results in ClinicalTrials.gov for FDA-approved drugs: A cross-sectional analysis
    Chen, Krista Y.
    Borglund, Erin M.
    Postema, Emma Charlotte
    Dunn, Adam G.
    Bourgeois, Florence T.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 19 (04) : 442 - 451
  • [22] Comparison of reporting phase I trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications
    Shepshelovich, D.
    Goldvaser, H.
    Wang, L.
    Razak, A. R. Abdul
    Bedard, P. L.
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2017, 35 (06) : 827 - 833
  • [23] Reporting of statistically significant results at ClinicalTrials.gov for completed superiority randomized controlled trials
    Dechartres, Agnes
    Bond, Elizabeth G.
    Scheer, Jordan
    Riveros, Carolina
    Atal, Ignacio
    Ravaud, Philippe
    BMC MEDICINE, 2016, 14
  • [25] Reporting of Results in ClinicalTrials.gov and High-Impact Journals
    Becker, Jessica E.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Ben-Josef, Gal
    Ross, Joseph S.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (10): : 1063 - 1065
  • [26] Results and Outcome Reporting ClinicalTrials.gov, What Makes it Happen?
    Kirillova, Olga
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (06):
  • [27] Reporting of Key Demographic Characteristics in Neurological Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov
    Fansiwala, Kush
    Southwick, Lauren
    Goldmann, Emily
    Parikh, Nina S.
    Madubuonwu, Joy
    Boden-Albala, Bernadette
    STROKE, 2017, 48
  • [28] Comparison of reporting phase I trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.
    Shepshelovich, Daniel
    Goldvaser, Hadar
    Wang, Lisa
    Razak, Albiruni Ryan Abdul
    Bedard, Philippe L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [29] Result reporting and early discontinuation of sepsis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov
    Hu, Handan
    Wang, Xinyi
    Huang, Peng
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, 2023, 16 (02) : 186 - 193
  • [30] Early discontinuation and results reporting in obstetric clinical trials: An analysis of 3317 clinicaltrials.gov investigations
    Weeks, Brannon
    Steinberg, Jecca R.
    Turner, Brandon
    Reyes, Griselda
    Conway, Alison A.
    Zhang, Wendy Y.
    Lindsay, Sarah
    Anderson, Jill N.
    Chan, Katelyn
    Igbinosa, Irogue
    Girsen, Anna
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Lyell, Deirdre J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S55 - S56