Evaluation of MLC leaf transmission on IMRT treatment plan quality of patients with advanced lung cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Chen, Jiayun
Fu, Guishan
Li, Minghui
Song, Yixin
Dai, Jianrong [1 ,2 ]
Miao, Junjie
Liu, Zhiqiang
Li, Yexiong
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Natl Canc Ctr, Canc Hosp, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
关键词
MLC transmission; IMRT; plan quality; lung sparing; 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; TREATMENT-RELATED PNEUMONITIS; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR; RADIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the impact of leaf treatment of multileaf collimator (MLC) in plan quality of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of patients with advanced lung cancer. Five MLCs with different leaf transmissions (0.01%, 0.5%, 1.2%, 1.8%, and 3%) were configured for an accelerator in a treatment planning system. Correspondingly, 5 treatment plans with the same optimization setting were created and evaluated quantitatively for each patient (11 patients total) who was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer. All of the 5 plans for each patient met the dose requirement for the planning treatment volumes (PTVs) and had similar target dose homogeneity and conformity. On average, the doses to selected organs were as follows: (1) V-5, V-20, and the mean dose of total lung; (2) the maximum and mean dose to spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV); and (3) V-30 and V-40 of heart, decreased slightly when MLC transmission was decreased, but with no statistical differences. There is a clear grouping of plans having total quality score (S-D) value, which is used to evaluate plan quality: (1) more than 1 (patient nos. 1 to 3, 5, and 8), and more than 2.5 (patient no. 6); (2) less than 1 (patient nos. 7 and 10); (3) around 1 (patient nos. 4, 9, and 11). As MLC transmission increased, overall S-D values increased as well and plan dose requirement was harder to meet. The clinical requirements were violated increasingly as MLC transmission became large. Total S-D with and without normal tissue (NT) showed similar results, with no statistically significant differences. Therefore, decrease of MLC transmission did have minimum impact on plan, and it improved target coverage and reduced normal tissue radiation slightly, with no statistical significance. Plan quality could not be significantly improved by MLC transmission reduction. However, lower MLC transmission may have advantages on lung sparing to low- and intermediate-dose exposure. Besides conventional fraction, hyperfraction, or sfeivotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the reduction on lung sparing is still essential because it is highly relevant to radiation pneumonitis (RP). It has potential to diminish incidence of RP and improve patient's quality of life after irradiation with lowered MLC transmission. (C) 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 318
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A longitudinal evaluation of improvements in treatment plan quality for lung cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Xia, Wenlong
    Liu, Zhiqiang
    Yan, Lingling
    Han, Fei
    Hu, Zhihui
    Tian, Yuan
    Cui, Weijie
    Ren, Wenting
    Guo, Chenlei
    Miao, Junjie
    Dai, Jianrong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (06): : 33 - 43
  • [32] Quality parameter for the evaluation of the MLC sequencer for IMRT fields in the Sliding window technique
    Blank, E.
    Eichwurzel, I
    Sidow, D.
    Budach, V
    Buchali, A.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2007, 183 : 26 - 26
  • [33] Model-based measurements of MLC leaf-offset and transmission factors for IMRT dose calculations
    Watanabe, Y
    Fu, X
    Kutcher, G
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1270 - 1270
  • [34] The role of IMRT in the treatment of lung cancer
    Schwarz, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S175 - S175
  • [35] Influence of MLC-characteristics and IMRT-Technique on the Plan Quality with Meningiomas and ENT-Tumors
    Kantz, S.
    Ganswindt, U.
    Alber, M.
    Soehn, M.
    Weingandt, H.
    Reiner, M.
    Belka, C.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2014, 190 : 42 - 42
  • [36] A longitudinal evaluation of improvements in radiotherapy treatment plan quality for head and neck cancer patients
    Tol, Jim P.
    Doornaert, Patricia
    Witte, Birgit I.
    Dahele, Max
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 (02) : 337 - 343
  • [37] Evaluation of Treatment Plan Quality of Single and Multiple Isocenter Stereotactic IMRT for Multiple Intracranial Tumors
    Giem, J.
    Algan, O.
    Young, J.
    Ali, I.
    Ahmad, S.
    Hossain, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S325 - S325
  • [38] Are simple IMRT beams more robust against MLC error? Exploring the impact of MLC errors on planar quality assurance and plan quality for different complexity beams
    Wang, Jiazhou
    Jin, Xiance
    Peng, Jiayuan
    Xie, Jiang
    Chen, Junchao
    Hu, Weigang
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (03): : 147 - 157
  • [39] RADIOBIOLOGICAL BASED TREATMENT PLAN EVALUATION AS AN INDICATOR OF RELATIVE PLAN QUALITY. A STUDY OF PROSTATE-IMRT TREATMENT PLANS.
    Simpson, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S586 - S587
  • [40] Impact of MLC leaf position errors on simple and complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer
    Mu, G.
    Ludlum, E.
    Xia, P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (01): : 77 - 88