Evaluation of MLC leaf transmission on IMRT treatment plan quality of patients with advanced lung cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Chen, Jiayun
Fu, Guishan
Li, Minghui
Song, Yixin
Dai, Jianrong [1 ,2 ]
Miao, Junjie
Liu, Zhiqiang
Li, Yexiong
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Natl Canc Ctr, Canc Hosp, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
关键词
MLC transmission; IMRT; plan quality; lung sparing; 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; TREATMENT-RELATED PNEUMONITIS; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR; RADIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the impact of leaf treatment of multileaf collimator (MLC) in plan quality of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of patients with advanced lung cancer. Five MLCs with different leaf transmissions (0.01%, 0.5%, 1.2%, 1.8%, and 3%) were configured for an accelerator in a treatment planning system. Correspondingly, 5 treatment plans with the same optimization setting were created and evaluated quantitatively for each patient (11 patients total) who was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer. All of the 5 plans for each patient met the dose requirement for the planning treatment volumes (PTVs) and had similar target dose homogeneity and conformity. On average, the doses to selected organs were as follows: (1) V-5, V-20, and the mean dose of total lung; (2) the maximum and mean dose to spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV); and (3) V-30 and V-40 of heart, decreased slightly when MLC transmission was decreased, but with no statistical differences. There is a clear grouping of plans having total quality score (S-D) value, which is used to evaluate plan quality: (1) more than 1 (patient nos. 1 to 3, 5, and 8), and more than 2.5 (patient no. 6); (2) less than 1 (patient nos. 7 and 10); (3) around 1 (patient nos. 4, 9, and 11). As MLC transmission increased, overall S-D values increased as well and plan dose requirement was harder to meet. The clinical requirements were violated increasingly as MLC transmission became large. Total S-D with and without normal tissue (NT) showed similar results, with no statistically significant differences. Therefore, decrease of MLC transmission did have minimum impact on plan, and it improved target coverage and reduced normal tissue radiation slightly, with no statistical significance. Plan quality could not be significantly improved by MLC transmission reduction. However, lower MLC transmission may have advantages on lung sparing to low- and intermediate-dose exposure. Besides conventional fraction, hyperfraction, or sfeivotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), the reduction on lung sparing is still essential because it is highly relevant to radiation pneumonitis (RP). It has potential to diminish incidence of RP and improve patient's quality of life after irradiation with lowered MLC transmission. (C) 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 318
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IMRT improves plan quality for cervical cancer patients compared to VMAT
    Sharfo, A. W.
    Voet, P.
    Breedveld, S.
    Heijkoop, S.
    Hoogeman, M.
    Heijmen, B. J. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S39 - S39
  • [22] Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment
    Chang, Yu
    Xiao, Feng
    Quan, Hong
    Yang, Zhiyong
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [23] Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment
    Yu Chang
    Feng Xiao
    Hong Quan
    Zhiyong Yang
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [24] Effect of Photon-Beam Energy on VMAT and IMRT Treatment Plan Quality and Dosimetric Accuracy for Advanced Prostate Cancer
    Pasler, Marlies
    Georg, Dietmar
    Wirtz, Holger
    Lutterbach, Johannes
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (12) : 792 - 798
  • [25] An Overlap-Wall-Histogram Plan Quality Classifier for Automatic Prostate Cancer IMRT Treatment Plan Quality Control
    Song, T.
    Tian, Z.
    Jia, X.
    Zhou, L.
    Jiang, S.
    Gu, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 230 - 230
  • [26] Comparing IMRT Versus VMAT Treatment Plan Quality for SRS Spine Patients
    Ulizio, V.
    Arora, V.
    Pearson, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E331 - E331
  • [27] Performance Evaluation of MLC Leaf-Sequencing Algorithms in Head-And-Neck IMRT
    Jing, J.
    Lin, H.
    Chow, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3475 - 3475
  • [28] Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning errors in dynamic IMRT plans using dynalogs files
    Olasolo Alonso, J.
    Gracia Ochoa, M.
    Pellejero Pellejero, S.
    Martin Albina, M. L.
    Fuentemilla Urio, N.
    Gallardo Rodriguez, N.
    Maneru Camara, F.
    Bragado Alvarez, L.
    Lozares Cordero, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S860 - S860
  • [29] The Impact of Standardized IMRT Templates on Treatment Plan Quality
    Eastham, D. V.
    Mitchell, J. D.
    Crooks, S.
    Hersey, C. D.
    Engel, R.
    Hristov, B.
    Hoopes, D. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S585 - S585
  • [30] On the use of the MLC dosimetric leaf gap as a quality control tool for accurate dynamic IMRT delivery
    Mei, Xiangyang
    Nygren, Ian
    Villarreal-Barajas, J. Eduardo
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (04) : 2246 - 2255