Variability of three activated clotting time point-of-care systems in cardiac surgery: reinforcing available evidence

被引:1
|
作者
Solis Clavijo, Diego [1 ]
Ortega Cotano, Abel [1 ]
Alonso Pena, Nuria [2 ]
Caballero Galvez, Sergio [1 ]
Arellano Nunez, Fernando [1 ]
Carballo Caro, Juan Manuel [1 ]
Munoz-Cacho, Pedro [3 ]
Tocon Ale, Cristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Virgen Rocio Univ Hosp, Ave Marie Curie 3,Portal 6 3 B, Seville 41927, Spain
[2] Marques Valdecilla Univ Hosp, Cardiovasc Surg Area, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
[3] Cantabrian Hlth Serv, Cantabria, Spain
来源
PERFUSION-UK | 2022年 / 37卷 / 07期
关键词
activated clotting time; anticoagulant drugs; blood coagulation test; point-of-care systems;
D O I
10.1177/02676591211023687
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation (ECC) requires the administration of anticoagulant drugs to maintain ACT ranges 400-600 seconds, which requires exhaustive coagulation monitoring for which various point-of-care devices are available. However, there is variability between them, so we aimed to compare the values in ACT measurement. Methods: Simultaneous ACT measurements were performed with the Hemochron Response(R), Hemostasis Management System Plus(R) (HMS Plus(R)) and Hemochron Signature(R) systems. Results: A total of 255 simultaneous measurements were taken, the mean and standard deviation (SD) of each device were: Hemochron Signature(R) 361.1 seconds (SD: 156.9), HMS Plus(R) 412.8 seconds (SD: 180.9) and Hemochron Response(R) 422.8 seconds (SD: 187.9), being these differences statistically significant (Fridman's test p < 0.01). For comparisons the Bland-Altman method was used, resulting the Hemochron Response(R) has 61.7 seconds higher mean values than the Hemochron Signature(R), the Hemochron Response(R) 10 seconds higher than the HMS Plus(R) and the HMS Plus(R) 51.7 seconds higher than the Hemochron Signature(R). Conclusion: The differences found in comparisons are considered to be clinically relevant, which is why it is considered important to make the variability of the different monitoring systems known and to take them into account for optimal control of this parameter and its clinical repercussions.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 714
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measures of Blood Hemoglobin and Hematocrit During Cardiac Surgery: Comparison of Three Point-of-Care Devices
    Kolotiniuk, Nikolai V.
    Manecke, Gerald R.
    Pinsky, Michael R.
    Banks, Dalia
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (04) : 1638 - 1641
  • [22] POINT-OF-CARE TESTING IN PRIMARY CARE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TEST EVALUATIONS AND AVAILABLE EVIDENCE
    Lingervelder, D.
    Koffijberg, H.
    IJzerman, M.
    Kusters, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S263 - S263
  • [23] Preoperative Point-of-Care Platelet Function Testing in Cardiac Surgery
    Agarwal, Seema
    Johnson, Robert Ian
    Shaw, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (02) : 333 - 341
  • [24] Point-of-Care Ultrasound in an Unstable Patient After Cardiac Surgery
    Gourdeau, Simon
    Beaubien-Souligny, William
    Denault, Andre Y.
    CHEST, 2022, 162 (06) : E325 - E330
  • [25] Point-of-Care Testing for the Emergency Department Patient Quantity and Quality of the Available Evidence
    Alter, David N.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 145 (03) : 308 - 319
  • [26] AN EVALUATION OF 2 ACTIVATED CLOTTING TIME MONITORS DURING CARDIAC-SURGERY
    REICH, DL
    ZAHL, K
    PERUCHO, MH
    THYS, DM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING, 1992, 8 (01): : 33 - 36
  • [27] Reference Intervals of Activated Clotting Time in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
    Maiga, Arhamatoulaye
    Tremblay, Julie
    Lamoureux-Asselin, Benoit
    Nyalendo, Carine
    Toledano, Baruch
    Poirier, Nancy C.
    Rivard, Georges-Etienne
    Bonnefoy, Arnaud
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [28] USE OF ACTIVATED CLOTTING TIME TO MONITOR ANTICOAGULATION DURING CARDIAC-SURGERY
    NIINIKOSKI, J
    LAATO, M
    LAAKSONEN, V
    JALONEN, J
    INBERG, MV
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1984, 18 (01): : 57 - 61
  • [29] Comparison of point of care methods for activated clotting times during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
    Beyer, L.
    Sorenson, L.
    Deobald, G.
    Griesmann, L.
    Karon, B.
    Santrach, P.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 53 (06) : A130 - A130
  • [30] Point-of-care testing for prothrombin time, but not activated partial thromboplastin time, correlates with laboratory methods in patients receiving antifibrinolytic agents while undergoing cardiac surgery
    Choi, T
    Greilich, PE
    Shi, C
    Wilson, JS
    Keller, A
    Kroll, M
    Markin, V
    TRANSFUSION, 2000, 40 (10) : 128S - 128S