The values of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and/or prostate-specific antigen in discriminating real Gleason score ≥ 7 prostate cancer from group of biopsy-based Gleason score ≤ 6

被引:9
|
作者
Wang, Hanfeng [1 ]
Gu, Liangyou [1 ]
Wu, Yongjie [2 ]
Feng, Dan [3 ]
Duan, Junyao [1 ]
Wang, Xiaocong [4 ]
Huang, Yong [4 ]
Wu, Shengpan [1 ]
Chen, Jianwen [1 ]
Luo, Guangda [1 ]
Zhang, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, PLA Med Sch, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese PLA 264 Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, PLA Med Sch, Med Stat Div, Hosp Management Inst, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, PLA Med Sch, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
来源
BMC CANCER | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Neoplasm grading; Systemic inflammatory index; Watchful waiting; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; FOLLOW-UP; RISK; DISEASE; TRENDS; GRADE;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-017-3614-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The discrepant concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen are well reported. To validate the clinical usefulness of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in discriminating real GS >= 7 PCa from biopsy-based GS <= 6 PCa in comparison with serum total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and value of their combination. Methods: One hundred one patients who underwent physical examinations incidentally found elevated tPSA and subsequently received biopsy with a conclusion of GS <= 6 and RP with an interval of 4-6 weeks after biopsy were enrolled. NLR and tPSA were obtained within 15 days prior to biopsy. Logistic regression model was applied appropriately; McNemar tests and AUC model were performed to evaluate differences among tPSA, NLR and their combination and corresponding diagnostic power respectively. Results: The pathological results from RP specimen comprised 61 patients with GS <= 6 and 100 patients with GS >= 7. Higher tPSA and NLR were significantly associated with patients with actual GS >= 7 (All P < 0.05) concurrently. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that tPSA (OR = 1.088, 95% C. I. = 1.029-1.151, P = 0.003) and NLR (OR = 1.807, 95% C. I. = 1.021-3.200, P = 0.042) could be independent predictors for GS groupings. Under cutoff value of 14.09 ng/ml for tPSA and 2.25 for NLR, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 60.0%, 80.3% and 67.7% for tPSA, 42%, 88.5% and 59.6% for NLR, and 71.0%, 75.4% and 72.7% for combination of tPSA and NLR (tPSA + NLR) respectively. The sensitivity of tPSA + NLR was significantly higher in comparison with tPSA (P = 0.001) and NLR (P < 0.001). Except for sensitivity, no significant difference was found between tPSA and NLR in specificity (P = 0.227) and accuracy (P = 0.132). tPSA got the largest AUC with 0.732 (p < 0.001, 95% C. I.: 0.651-0.813). Conclusions: Serum tPSA and NLR were significantly elevated among GS >= 7 PCa concurrently. The combination of tPSA and NLR might have additional benefit to biopsy on discriminating real GS >= 7 Pca from biopsy-based GS <= 6 PCa. More stratification models and prospectively multicenter studies are necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma
    Kweldam, C.
    Kummerlin, I.
    Nieboer, D.
    Verhoef, E.
    Steyerberg, E.
    Incrocci, L.
    Bangma, C.
    van der Kwast, T.
    Roobol, M.
    van Leenders, G.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 : S221 - S221
  • [42] COMBINED ROLE OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, GLEASON SCORE, AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN PREDICTING ORGAN-CONFINED PROSTATE-CANCER
    WOLF, JS
    SHINOHARA, K
    CARROLL, PR
    NARAYAN, P
    UROLOGY, 1993, 42 (02) : 131 - 137
  • [43] Prostate-specific antigen velocity and the odds of detecting gleason 8 to 10 prostate cancer at biopsy.
    D'Amico, A. V.
    Cullen, J.
    Chen, Y.
    McLeod, D. G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 233S - 233S
  • [44] THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE AND GLEASON SCORE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    PARTIN, AW
    WALSH, PC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (01): : 172 - 173
  • [45] Association between findings of bone scintigraphy, serum prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer
    Demirel, K.
    Aydogan, F.
    Oezdemir, E.
    Koca, G.
    Tuerkoelmez, S.
    Korkmaz, M.
    Cebeci, O. Oe.
    Ayyildiz, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 : S277 - S277
  • [46] NOMOGRAM FOR PREDICTING THE RISK OF NODE INVOLVEMENT IN PROSTATE-CANCER GIVEN PRETREATMENT PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND GLEASON SCORE - REPLY
    ROACH, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 30 (02): : 510 - 510
  • [47] Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma
    Kweldam, Charlotte F.
    Kummerlin, Intan P.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Verhoef, Esther I.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Incrocci, Luca
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    van Leenders, Geert J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 66 : 26 - 33
  • [48] THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE AND GLEASON SCORE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    PARTIN, AW
    YOO, J
    CARTER, HB
    PEARSON, JD
    CHAN, DW
    EPSTEIN, JI
    WALSH, PC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (01): : 110 - 114
  • [49] Significance of small foci of Gleason score 7 or greater prostate cancer on needle biopsy
    Yang, XMJ
    Lecksell, K
    Potter, SR
    Epstein, JI
    UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (03) : 528 - 532
  • [50] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prostate-Specific Antigen Density for Prediction of Gleason Score Upgrade in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer on Initial Biopsy
    Sim, Ki Choon
    Sung, Deuk Jae
    Kang, Kun Woo
    Yang, Kyung Sook
    Han, Na Yeon
    Park, Beom Jin
    Kim, Min Ju
    Cho, Sung Bum
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2017, 41 (05) : 731 - 736