The values of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and/or prostate-specific antigen in discriminating real Gleason score ≥ 7 prostate cancer from group of biopsy-based Gleason score ≤ 6

被引:9
|
作者
Wang, Hanfeng [1 ]
Gu, Liangyou [1 ]
Wu, Yongjie [2 ]
Feng, Dan [3 ]
Duan, Junyao [1 ]
Wang, Xiaocong [4 ]
Huang, Yong [4 ]
Wu, Shengpan [1 ]
Chen, Jianwen [1 ]
Luo, Guangda [1 ]
Zhang, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, PLA Med Sch, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese PLA 264 Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, PLA Med Sch, Med Stat Div, Hosp Management Inst, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, PLA Med Sch, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
来源
BMC CANCER | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Neoplasm grading; Systemic inflammatory index; Watchful waiting; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; FOLLOW-UP; RISK; DISEASE; TRENDS; GRADE;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-017-3614-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The discrepant concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen are well reported. To validate the clinical usefulness of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in discriminating real GS >= 7 PCa from biopsy-based GS <= 6 PCa in comparison with serum total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and value of their combination. Methods: One hundred one patients who underwent physical examinations incidentally found elevated tPSA and subsequently received biopsy with a conclusion of GS <= 6 and RP with an interval of 4-6 weeks after biopsy were enrolled. NLR and tPSA were obtained within 15 days prior to biopsy. Logistic regression model was applied appropriately; McNemar tests and AUC model were performed to evaluate differences among tPSA, NLR and their combination and corresponding diagnostic power respectively. Results: The pathological results from RP specimen comprised 61 patients with GS <= 6 and 100 patients with GS >= 7. Higher tPSA and NLR were significantly associated with patients with actual GS >= 7 (All P < 0.05) concurrently. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that tPSA (OR = 1.088, 95% C. I. = 1.029-1.151, P = 0.003) and NLR (OR = 1.807, 95% C. I. = 1.021-3.200, P = 0.042) could be independent predictors for GS groupings. Under cutoff value of 14.09 ng/ml for tPSA and 2.25 for NLR, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 60.0%, 80.3% and 67.7% for tPSA, 42%, 88.5% and 59.6% for NLR, and 71.0%, 75.4% and 72.7% for combination of tPSA and NLR (tPSA + NLR) respectively. The sensitivity of tPSA + NLR was significantly higher in comparison with tPSA (P = 0.001) and NLR (P < 0.001). Except for sensitivity, no significant difference was found between tPSA and NLR in specificity (P = 0.227) and accuracy (P = 0.132). tPSA got the largest AUC with 0.732 (p < 0.001, 95% C. I.: 0.651-0.813). Conclusions: Serum tPSA and NLR were significantly elevated among GS >= 7 PCa concurrently. The combination of tPSA and NLR might have additional benefit to biopsy on discriminating real GS >= 7 Pca from biopsy-based GS <= 6 PCa. More stratification models and prospectively multicenter studies are necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combined Analysis of Biparametric MRI and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: Role in the Prebiopsy Diagnosis of Gleason Score 7 or Greater Prostate Cancer
    Lee, Suji
    Oh, Young Taik
    Jung, Dae Chul
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Park, Sung Yoon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (03) : W166 - W172
  • [22] Pathological features of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers in the low and intermediate range of prostate-specific antigen level: is there a difference?
    Pelzer, Alexandre E.
    Colleselli, Daniela
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Steiner, Eberhard
    Ramoner, Reinhold
    Mitterberger, Michael
    Schwentner, Christian
    Schaefer, Georg
    Ongarello, Stefano
    Bartsch, Georg
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (07) : 822 - 825
  • [23] COMPARISON OF BIOCHEMICAL RELAPSE-FREE SURVIVAL BETWEEN PRIMARY GLEASON SCORE 3 AND PRIMARY GLEASON SCORE 4 FOR BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE 7 PROSTATE CANCER
    Burdick, Michael J.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ulchaker, James
    Angermeier, Kenneth
    Altman, Andrew
    Chehade, Nabil
    Mahadevan, Arul
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (05): : 1439 - 1445
  • [24] Correlation of preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score with seminal vesicle involvement in prostate adenocarcinoma
    Ormsby, AH
    Skacel, M
    Brainard, JA
    Zippe, CD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 112 (04) : 548 - 548
  • [25] The impact of prostate-specific antigen, its density and the Gleason score in the prediction of extracapsular disease in prostate carcinoma
    Akdas, A
    Tarcan, T
    Turkeri, L
    Biren, T
    Kullu, S
    Ilker, Y
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1997, 31 (03) : 311 - 316
  • [26] The association of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway to Gleason Score, prostate-specific antigen and pathologic stage in prostate cancer
    Gottschalk, AR
    Weinberg, V
    Carroll, P
    Simko, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S474 - S474
  • [27] Use of prostate-specific antigen, gleason score, and digital rectal examination in staging patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer
    Rees, MA
    Resnick, MI
    Oesterling, JE
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 24 (02) : 379 - &
  • [28] NOMOGRAM FOR PREDICTING THE RISK OF NODE INVOLVEMENT IN PROSTATE-CANCER GIVEN PRETREATMENT PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND GLEASON SCORE
    LEHRER, S
    SONG, HK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 30 (02): : 509 - 510
  • [29] Prostate-specific antigen levels of ≤4 and >4 ng/mL and risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality in men with biopsy Gleason score 9 to 10 prostate cancer
    Kim, Daniel W.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Wu, Jing
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    D'Amico, Anthony, V
    CANCER, 2021, 127 (13) : 2222 - 2228
  • [30] Gleason score and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen in survival among patients with stage D2 prostate cancer
    William D. Figg
    Michael E. Franks
    David Venzon
    Paul Duray
    Michael C. Cox
    W. Marston Linehan
    W. Van Bingham
    James A. Eastham
    Eddie Reed
    Oliver Sartor
    World Journal of Urology, 2004, 22 : 425 - 430