Magnetic Fractions of PM2.5, PM2.5-10, and PM10 from Coal Fly Ash as Environmental Pollutants

被引:11
|
作者
Fomenko, Elena, V [1 ]
Anshits, Natalia N. [1 ]
Solovyov, Leonid A. [1 ]
Knyazev, Yuriy, V [2 ]
Semenov, Sergey, V [2 ,3 ]
Bayukov, Oleg A. [2 ]
Anshits, Alexander G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Krasnoyarsk Sci Ctr SB RAS, Inst Chem & Chem Technol SB RAS, Fed Res Ctr, Krasnoyarsk 5024, Russia
[2] Krasnoyarsk Sci Ctr SB RAS, Kirensky Inst Phys SB RAS, Fed Res Ctr, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia
[3] Siberian Fed Univ, Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia
来源
ACS OMEGA | 2021年 / 6卷 / 30期
关键词
FIRED POWER-PLANT; REMANENT MAGNETIZATION; CATALYTIC-PROPERTIES; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; FERROSPHERES; MOSSBAUER; IRON; NANOPARTICLES; MICROSPHERES; CENOSPHERES;
D O I
10.1021/acsomega.1c03187
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Characterization of magnetic particulate matter (PM) in coal fly ashes is critical to assessing the health risks associated with industrial coal combustion and for future applications of fine fractions that will minimize solid waste pollution. In this study, magnetic narrow fractions of fine ferrospheres related to environmentally hazardous PM2.5, PM2.5-10, and PM10 were for the first time separated from fly ash produced during combustion of Ekibastuz coal. It was determined that the average diameter of globules in narrow fractions is 1, 2, 3, and 7 mu m. The major components of chemical composition are Fe2O3 (57-60) wt %, SiO2 (25-28 wt %), and Al2O3 (10-12 wt %). The phase composition is represented by crystalline phases, including ferrospinel, alpha-Fe2O3, epsilon-Fe2O3, mullite, and quartz, as well as the amorphous glass phase. Mossbauer spectroscopy and magnetic measurements confirmed the formation of nanoscale particles of epsilon-Fe2O3. Stabilization of the epsilon-Fe2O3 metastable phase, with quite ideal distribution of iron cations, occurs in the glass matrix due to the rapid cooling of fine globules during their formation from mineral components of coal.
引用
收藏
页码:20076 / 20085
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictability analysis of the PM2.5 and PM10 concentration in Budapest
    Ferenczi, Zita
    IDOJARAS, 2013, 117 (04): : 359 - 375
  • [42] Overview and Seasonality of PM10 and PM2.5 in Guayaquil, Ecuador
    Daniel Moran-Zuloaga
    Wilson Merchan-Merchan
    Emilio Rodríguez-Caballero
    Philip Hernick
    Julio Cáceres
    Mauricio H. Cornejo
    Aerosol Science and Engineering, 2021, 5 : 499 - 515
  • [43] PM2.5, PM10 and bronchiolitis severity: A cohort study
    Milani, Gregorio P.
    Cafora, Marco
    Favero, Chiara
    Luganini, Anna
    Carugno, Michele
    Lenzi, Erica
    Pistocchi, Anna
    Pinatel, Eva
    Pariota, Luigi
    Ferrari, Luca
    Bollati, Valentina
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10)
  • [44] PM2.5 and PM10 emissions by abrasion of agricultural soils
    Tatarko, John
    Kucharski, Matthew
    Li, Hongli
    Li, Huiru
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2020, 200
  • [45] Indoor PM10 and PM2.5 at Nurseries and Primary Schools
    Sousa, S. I., V
    Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M.
    Martins, F. G.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-8, 2012, 433-440 : 385 - 390
  • [46] Cyclones as PM10 and PM2.5 emission measurement classifiers
    Hemerka, J.
    Branis, M.
    Vybiral, P.
    AIR POLLUTION XVIII, 2010, 136 : 395 - 406
  • [47] Emission measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 at industrial plants
    Geueke, KJ
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2005, 65 (7-8): : 313 - 316
  • [48] PM10/PM2.5 Emissionsmessungen: Gerateentwicklung und Ergebnisse
    John, Astrid
    Kuhlbusch, Thomas
    Fissan, Heinz
    Geueke, Karl-Josef
    Broker, G.
    VDI Berichte, 2002, (1722): : 209 - 218
  • [49] Influences of wind and precipitation on different-sized particulate matter concentrations (PM2.5, PM10, PM2.5–10)
    Boen Zhang
    Limin Jiao
    Gang Xu
    Suli Zhao
    Xin Tang
    Yue Zhou
    Chen Gong
    Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2018, 130 : 383 - 392
  • [50] Assessment of ambient air PM10 and PM2.5 and characterization of PM10 in the city of Kanpur, India
    Sharma, M
    Maloo, S
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (33) : 6015 - 6026