PM2.5 and PM10 emissions by abrasion of agricultural soils

被引:20
|
作者
Tatarko, John [1 ]
Kucharski, Matthew [2 ]
Li, Hongli [3 ,4 ]
Li, Huiru [5 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Rangeland Resources & Syst Res Unit, 2150 Ctr Ave,Bldg D,Suite 200, Ft Collins, CO 80522 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Agr Syst Res Unit, Manhattan, KS USA
[3] Shandong Agr Univ, Forestry Coll, Tai An, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Mt Tai Forest Ecosyst Res Stn State Forestry & Gr, Tai An, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
来源
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH | 2020年 / 200卷
关键词
Dust emission; PM2.5/PM10; ratio; Wind tunnel; Conventional tillage; No-till; WIND EROSION; REDUCED TILLAGE; UNITED-STATES; DESERT DUST; NO-TILLAGE; AGGREGATE; PREDICTION; SUSPENSION; TRANSPORT; TEXTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.still.2020.104601
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Abrasion of soil clods by wind erosion is one process contributing to fine particulate emissions, which degrades air quality. Little is known about the abrasion process that generates and emits particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 mu m (PM2.5) or those less than 10 mu m (PM10). Both PM2.5 and PM10 are regulated by the US-Environmental Protection Agency as health hazards. We used a laboratory wind tunnel to study the abrasion induced emissions of 15 aggregated soils from across the U.S. We subjected aggregated soils in trays as well as sets of aggregates placed on the wind tunnel floor to abrader sand (0.29 to 0.42 mm diameter) blown at 13 m s(-1). PM2.5 and PM10 emissions were found to vary by soil type. Sandy soils had the poorest aggregation as well as lowest primary fine particulate contents and were found to have the greatest abrasion coefficients (AC) and highest emission of PM2.5 and PM10 under abrasion. By contrast, soils higher in clay had lower AC and emissions under abrasion. In addition, five of the soils tested had long-term histories of both conventional tillage (CT) and no-till (NT) management for paired comparisons of emission based on CT and NT managements. CT management tended to show higher AC values and greater abrasion emissions compared to NT management for the same soil, although only three of five management pairs were significant. Dry aggregate stability parameters were found to have an exponential relationship to AC with break force being a better AC predictor (R-2 = 0.936) than dry stability (R-2 = 0.894). We also developed equations that predict PM2.5 emissions as a fraction of PM10 emissions for aggregated soils (R-2 = 0.932) and individual aggregates alone (R-2 = 0.854). This research contributes to the understanding and prediction of PM2.5 and PM10 emission through the abrasion process.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PM2.5 and PM10 emissions by breakage during saltation of agricultural soils
    Tatarko, John
    Kucharski, Matthew
    Li, Hongli
    Li, Huiru
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2021, 208
  • [2] PM2.5 and PM10 emissions from agricultural soils by wind erosion
    Li, Hongli
    Tatarko, John
    Kucharski, Matthew
    Dong, Zhi
    [J]. AEOLIAN RESEARCH, 2015, 19 : 171 - 182
  • [3] Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors
    Williams, R
    Suggs, J
    Rodes, C
    Lawless, P
    Zweidinger, R
    Kwok, R
    Creason, J
    Sheldon, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (05): : 497 - 505
  • [4] Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors
    RON WILLIAMS
    JACK SUGGS
    CHARLES RODES
    PHIL LAWLESS
    ROY ZWEIDINGER
    RICHARD KWOK
    JOHN CREASON
    LINDA SHELDON
    [J]. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2000, 10 : 497 - 505
  • [5] PM10 and PM2.5:: an international perspective
    Sloss, LL
    Smith, IM
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 65 : 127 - 141
  • [6] Retrieving visibility with PM10 and PM2.5
    Center for Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, CAS, Hefei 230031, China
    [J]. Guangxue Jishu, 2008, 4 (608-609+612):
  • [7] CESAR:: PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations
    Hoek, G
    de Bruin, YB
    Fletcher, T
    Houthuijs, D
    Jirík, V
    Lolova, D
    Meliefste, K
    Mihalíková, E
    Pastuszka, J
    Sachelarescu, S
    Vaskövi, E
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (04) : S29 - S29
  • [8] Measurement of PM, PM10, PM2.5 and CPM emissions from paper machine sources
    Carlson, Leland W.
    Tatum, Vickie L.
    [J]. NCASI Technical Bulletin, 2007, (942): : 1 - 134
  • [9] Traceability Issue in PM2.5 and PM10 Measurements
    Shankar G. Aggarwal
    Sudhanshu Kumar
    Papiya Mandal
    Bighnaraj Sarangi
    Khem Singh
    Jyoti Pokhariyal
    Sumit K. Mishra
    Smita Agarwal
    Deepak Sinha
    Sukhvir Singh
    Chhemendra Sharma
    Prabhat K. Gupta
    [J]. MAPAN, 2013, 28 : 153 - 166
  • [10] PM10 and PM2.5 -: legislation, measurement and control
    Sloss, LL
    Smith, IM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2002, 17 (1-2) : 157 - 169