The acceptance and effectiveness of interactive online learning in virtual face-to-face learning technology

被引：1

作者：

Suksakorn, Achara ^{[1
]}

Tubtiang, Arnon ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] KMUTT, Grad Sch Management & Innovat GMI, 126CB5,8th Floor,Pracha Utid Rd, Bangkok 10120, Thailand

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND LEARNING | 2020年 / 27卷 / 02期

关键词：

massive open online courses; MOOCs; interactive online learning; IOL; non-formal education; NFE; student or technology end user; technology acceptance; UTAUT; virtual face-to-face learning;

D O I：

10.1504/IJIL.2020.105076

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;

摘要：

In this research, influential factors affecting the acceptance of Interactive online learning in virtual face-to-face learning technology of high school students in non-formal education, in Thailand were studied based on the new modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology conceptual framework. The result shows all factors accept the hypotheses at the significance level of 0.05, where R-2 of Y1 = 0.702 and R-2 of Y2 = 0.602. The theory's result is consistent with the post-test score after study using interactive online learning in virtual face-to-face technology is greater than the pre-test one. The data obtained from the analysis can be used for planning and developing to meet users' needs, to help users gain more knowledge towards using interactive online learning in virtual face-to-face learning technology and can be served as a guideline for related researches, accomplishing the academic results in mathematics and other subjects in the future.

引用

页码：135 / 158

页数：24

共 50 条

[21] Face-to-face and virtual vocabulary learning for individuals with intellectual disabilities
Ayuso-Lanchares, Alba
Ruiz-Requies, Ines
Santiago-Pardo, Rosa Belen
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2024,
[22] Assessing members' satisfaction in virtual and face-to-face learning teams
Cicei, Cristiana Catalina
[J]. 4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES (WCES-2012), 2012, 46 : 4466 - 4470
[23] Temporal changes in procrastination in online and face-to-face learning environments
Sun, Tianchen
Tjuandi, Glenndi
Kim, Ji-Eun
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2024, 100
[24] English Language Learning Anxiety in Online and Face-to-Face Classes
Behforouz, Behnam
Gallema, Marilyn C.
Waga, Rhona Maria A.
Al Weshahi, Saif
[J]. JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2022, 19 (02): : 469 - 488
[25] A taxonomy to define courses that mix face-to-face and online learning
Margulieux, Lauren E.
McCracken, W. Michael
Catrambone, Richard
[J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2016, 19 : 104 - 118
[26] Face-to-face vs. Online learning in Engineering Courses
Guadalupe Garcia-Castelan, Rosa Maria
Gonzalez-Nucamendi, Andres
Robledo-Rella, Victor
Neri, Luis
Noguez, Julieta
[J]. 2021 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2021), 2021,
[27] Symposium: Modeling cognitive processes in interactive learning situations: Face-to-face learning and learning over a network
Frederiksen, C
Donin, J
Lajoie, S
Koschmann, T
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTIETH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1998, : 5 - 5
[28] An Interactive Table for Supporting Participation Balance in Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning
Bachour, Khaled
Kaplan, Frederic
Dillenbourg, Pierre
[J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2010, 3 (03): : 203 - 213
[29] An Organizational Model of Online Learning in the Pandemic Period: Comparison with Traditional Face-to-Face Learning
Checa-Morales, Cristina
De-Pablos-Heredero, Carmen
Diaz Ocampo, Eduardo
Guiselli Torres, Yenny
Garcia, Anton
[J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (07):
[30] The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings
Marchand, Gwen C.
Gutierrez, Antonio P.
[J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 15 (03): : 150 - 160

← 1 2 3 4 5 →