Patient-Centered Decision-making for Postoperative Narcotic-Free Endocrine Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:5
|
作者
Zhu, Catherine Y. [1 ]
Schumm, Max A. [1 ]
Hu, Theodore X. [1 ]
Nguyen, Dalena T. [1 ]
Kim, Jiyoon [2 ]
Tseng, Chi-Hong [3 ]
Lin, Anne Y. [1 ]
Yeh, MichaelW. [1 ]
Livhits, Masha J. [1 ]
Wu, James X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, 10833 Le Conte Ave,72-228 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
CERVICAL PLEXUS BLOCK; OPIOID USE; PAIN; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4287
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Historically, opioid pain medications have been overprescribed following thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Many narcotic prescriptions are incompletely consumed, creating waste and opportunities for abuse. OBJECTIVE To determine whether limiting opioid prescriptions after outpatient thyroid and parathyroid surgery to patients who opt in to narcotic treatment reduces opioid consumption without increasing postoperative pain compared with usual care (routine narcotic prescriptions). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized clinical trial of Postoperative Opt-In Narcotic Treatment (POINT) or routine narcotic prescription (control) was conducted at a single tertiary referral center from June 1 to December 30, 2020. A total of 180 adults undergoing ambulatory cervical endocrine surgery, excluding patients currently receiving opioids, were assessed for eligibility. POINT patients received perioperative pain management counseling and were prescribed opioids only on patient request. Patients reported pain scores (0-10) and medication use through 7 daily postoperative surveys. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with opioid consumption. INTERVENTIONS Patients in the POINT group were able to opt in or out of receiving prescriptions for opioid pain medication on discharge. Control patients received routine opioid prescriptions on discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Daily peak pain score through postoperative day 7 was the primary outcome. Noninferiority was defined as a difference less than 2 on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 to 10. Analysis was conducted on the evaluable population. RESULTS Of the 180 patients assessed for eligibility, the final study cohort comprised 102 patients: 48 randomized to POINT and 54 to control. Of these, 79 patients (77.5%) were women and median age was 52 (interquartile range, 43-62) years. A total of 550 opioid tablets were prescribed to the control group, and 230 tablets were prescribed to the POINT group, in which 23 patients (47.9%) opted in for an opioid prescription. None who opted out subsequently required rescue opioids. In the first postoperative week, 17 POINT patients (35.4% of survey responders in the POINT group) reported consuming opioids compared with 27 (50.0%) control patients (P=.16). Median peak outpatient pain scores were 6 (interquartile range, 4-8) in the control group vs 6 (interquartile range, 5-7) in the POINT group (P=.71). In multivariate analysis, patients with a history of narcotic use were 7.5 times more likely to opt in (95% CI, 1.61-50.11; P=.02) and 4.8 times more likely to consume opioids (95% CI, 1.04-1.52; P=.01). Higher body mass index (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.23; P=.03) and highest inpatient postoperative pain score (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.52; P=.02) were also associated with opioid consumption. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, an opt-in strategy for postoperative narcotics reduced opioid prescription without increasing pain after cervical endocrine surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Informed Decision-Making as a Patient-Centered Initiative in Surgical Planning: In Reply to Fink and Colleagues
    Long, Kristin L.
    Ingraham, Angela M.
    Pitt, Susan C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 234 (05) : 976 - 977
  • [22] Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Versus Surveillance: Physician Bias and Patient-centered Decision-making
    Johnson, Skyler B.
    Decker, Roy H.
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2018, 19 (06) : 464 - 466
  • [23] Decision-Making in Audiology: Balancing Evidence-Based Practice and Patient-Centered Care
    Boisvert, Isabelle
    Clemesha, Jennifer
    Lundmark, Erik
    Crome, Erica
    Barr, Caitlin
    McMahon, Catherine M.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2017, 21
  • [24] Multi-pilot implementation experiences of patient-centered pathology reports: lessons learned for the advancement of patient-centered tools for cancer decision-making
    Austin, Elizabeth J. J.
    Kilgore, Mark R. R.
    Ko, Cynthia W. W.
    Parker, Elizabeth U. U.
    Alvarez, Rebeca
    Koch, Lisa K. K.
    Donlan, Amelia W. W.
    Lee, Janie M. M.
    Flanagan, Meghan R. R.
    DeStefano, Lauren M. M.
    Javid, Sara H. H.
    Gore, John L. L.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2023, 34 (04) : 399 - 406
  • [25] Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision-making aid for orthodontics
    Parker, Kate
    Cunningham, Susan J.
    Petrie, Aviva
    Ryan, Fiona S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [26] Multi-pilot implementation experiences of patient-centered pathology reports: lessons learned for the advancement of patient-centered tools for cancer decision-making
    Elizabeth J. Austin
    Mark R. Kilgore
    Cynthia W. Ko
    Elizabeth U. Parker
    Rebeca Alvarez
    Lisa K. Koch
    Amelia W. Donlan
    Janie M. Lee
    Meghan R. Flanagan
    Lauren M. DeStefano
    Sara H. Javid
    John L. Gore
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2023, 34 : 399 - 406
  • [27] Coronary Artery Bifurcation Interventions: The Disconnect Between Randomized Clinical Trials and Patient Centered Decision-Making
    Moussa, Issam D.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 77 (04) : 537 - 545
  • [28] Patient decision-making personas: An application of a patient-centered cognitive task analysis (P-CTA)
    Holden, Richard J.
    Daley, Carly N.
    Mickelson, Robin S.
    Bolchini, Davide
    Toscos, Tammy
    Cornet, Victor P.
    Miller, Amy
    Mirro, Michael J.
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2020, 87
  • [29] Clinical Decision Making for Physical Therapists in Patient-Centered End-of-Life Care
    Briggs, Richard W.
    TOPICS IN GERIATRIC REHABILITATION, 2011, 27 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [30] A PATIENT-CENTERED DA FOR IMPROVING DECISION MAKING ABOUT CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS PARTICIPATION
    Studts, Jamie L.
    Studts, Jamie
    Tannenbaum, Stacey
    Byrne, Margaret
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 50 : S210 - S210