Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision-making aid for orthodontics

被引:21
|
作者
Parker, Kate [1 ,2 ]
Cunningham, Susan J. [3 ]
Petrie, Aviva [3 ]
Ryan, Fiona S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp Fdn Trust, Eastman Dent Inst, London, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp Fdn Trust, Eastman Dent Hosp, London, England
[3] UCL, Eastman Dent Inst, London, England
关键词
SUPPORT; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.04.011
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Patient decision-making aids (PDAs) are instruments that facilitate shared decision making and enable patients to reach informed, individual decisions regarding health care. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of a PDA compared with traditional information provision for adolescent patients considering fixed appliance orthodontic treatment. Methods: Before treatment, orthodontic patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: the intervention group received the PDA and standard information regarding fixed appliances, and the control group received the standard information only. Decisional conflict was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the levels of decisional conflict were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Seventy-two patients were recruited and randomized in a ratio of 1: 1 to the PDA and control groups. Seventy-one patients completed the trial (control group, 36; PDA group, 35); this satisfied the sample size calculation. The median total Decisional Conflict Scale score in the PDA group was lower than in the control group (15.63 and 19.53, respectively). However, this difference was not statistically significant (difference between groups, 3.90; 95% confidence interval of the difference, -4.30 to 12.11). Sex, ethnicity, age, and the time point at which patients were recruited did not have significant effects on Decisional Conflict Scale scores. No harm was observed or reported for any participant in the study. Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the provision of a PDA to adolescents before they consented for fixed appliances did not significantly reduce decisional conflict. There may be a benefit in providing a PDA for some patients, but it is not yet possible to say how these patients could be identified. Registration: This trial was registered with the Harrow National Research Ethics Committee (reference 12/LO/0279). Protocol: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 160
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Shared Decision-Making with a Patient Decision Aid for Postangiography Hemostasis Method Selection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Huang, Yi-Chun
    Kao, Chao-Chen
    Lu, Yueh-Hsun
    Chou, Yun-Yun
    Lin, Yen-Kuang
    Tam, Ka-Wai
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (05) : 832 - 839
  • [2] A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Utility of a Patient Decision Aid to Improve Clinical Trial (RAVES 08.03) Related Decision-Making
    Sundaresan, P.
    Ager, B.
    Turner, S. L.
    Costa, D.
    Kneebone, A.
    Pearse, M.
    Woo, H.
    Tesson, S.
    Juraskova, I.
    Butow, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (05): : 1316 - 1316
  • [3] Evaluation of the effect of a patient decision aid about vasectomy on the decision-making process a randomized trial
    Labrecque, Michel
    Paunescu, Cristina
    Plesu, Ioana
    Stacey, Dawn
    Legare, France
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (06) : 556 - 562
  • [4] Decision-making at menopause: A randomized controlled trial of a computer-based hormone therapy decision-aid
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    Gilligan, Mary Ann
    McAuliffe, Timothy
    Garmon, Gwenn
    Carnes, Molly
    Nattinger, Ann B.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2007, 67 (1-2) : 100 - 107
  • [5] A randomised controlled trial evaluating the utility of a patient Decision Aid to improve clinical trial (RAVES 08.03) related decision-making
    Sundaresan, Puma
    Ager, Brittany
    Turner, Sandra
    Costa, Dan
    Kneebone, Andrew
    Pearse, Maria
    Woo, Henry
    Tesson, Stephanie
    Juraskova, Ilona
    Butow, Phyllis
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 125 (01) : 124 - 129
  • [6] Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making by Persons Who Smoke A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Volk, Robert J.
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Leal, Viola B.
    Escoto, Kamisha H.
    Cantor, Scott B.
    Munden, Reginald F.
    Rabius, Vance A.
    Bailey, Linda
    Cinciripini, Paul M.
    Lin, Heather
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Luckett, Pamela Graef
    Esparza, Angelina
    Godoy, Myrna C.
    Bevers, Therese B.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (01)
  • [7] Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a New Tool to Support Patient Decision-making on Transplant Centers
    Mckinney, Warren T.
    Israni, Kareena
    Schaffhausen, Cory R.
    Schladt, David P.
    Lyden, Grace R.
    Matas, Arthur
    Wolf, Jack
    Japuntich, Sandra
    Israni, Ajay K.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 38 (12)
  • [8] A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL EVALUATING THE UTILITY OF A PATIENT DECISION AID TO IMPROVE A PROSTATE CANCER CLINICAL TRIAL RELATED DECISION-MAKING AND RECRUITMENT
    Sundaresan, Puma
    Ager, Brittany
    Butow, Phyllis
    Tesson, Stephanie
    Costa, Daniel
    Kneebone, Andrew
    Pearse, Maria
    Woo, Henry
    Juraskova, Ilona
    Turner, Sandra
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E123 - E123
  • [9] Randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening
    Dolan, JG
    Frisina, S
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 22 (02) : 125 - 139
  • [10] DECISION-MAKING DURING A PHASE-III RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    BERRY, DA
    WOLFF, MC
    SACK, D
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 15 (05): : 360 - 378