Understanding the social impacts of enforcement activities on illegal wildlife trade in China

被引:6
|
作者
Hu, Sifan [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Yu [3 ]
Pan, Rong [3 ]
Zou, Fasheng [4 ]
Lee, Tien Ming [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Life Sci, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, State Key Lab Biol Control, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Acad Sci, Inst Zool, Guangdong Key Lab Anim Conservat & Resource Utili, Guangdong Publ Lab Wild Anim Conservat & Utilizat, Guangzhou 510260, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Ecol, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Oxford, Oxford Martin Sch, Oxford OX1 3BD, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Conservation; Cost-effectiveness; Online seizure news; Public whistle-blowing; Social feedback; Threatened species; CONSERVATION; CAUSALITY; AWARENESS; TRENDS; MEDIA; LONG;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-021-01686-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Illegal wildlife trade enforcement is a cornerstone conservation strategy worldwide, yet we have a limited understanding on its social impacts. Using Chinese online wildlife seizure news (2003-2018), we evaluated the interactions among enforcement operations, news frequency, and social engagement (i.e., whistle-blowing) frequency. Our results showed that intensive enforcement operations, which commenced after 2012, have social impacts by increasing the frequency of all seizure news significantly by 28% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 5%, 51%] and those via whistle-blowing by 24% [95% CI: 2%, 45%], when compared to counterfactual models where possible confounding factors were accounted for. Furthermore, we revealed the potential interaction between enforcement seizure news with and without social engagement, and the consequential social feedback process. Of the species identified from 'whistle-blowing' news, up to 28% are considered as high conservation priorities. Overall, we expanded our understanding of the enforcement impacts to social dimensions, which could contribute to improving the cost-effectiveness of such conservation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:1643 / 1657
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Track illegal trade in wildlife
    Toledo, Luis Felipe
    Asmuessen, Marianne V.
    Paul Rodriguez, Jon
    NATURE, 2012, 483 (7387) : 36 - 36
  • [22] track illegal trade in wildlife
    Luís Felipe Toledo
    Marianne V. Asmüssen
    Jon Paul Rodríguez
    Nature, 2012, 483 : 36 - 36
  • [23] An analysis of illegal wildlife trade with the aid of social media and prevention strategies
    Roy, Debaditya
    Kumar, Vinod
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE AND BIODIVERSITY, 2024, 8 (01) : 386 - 401
  • [24] A framework for investigating illegal wildlife trade on social media with machine learning
    Di Minin, Enrico
    Fink, Christoph
    Hiippala, Tuomo
    Tenkanen, Henrikki
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (01) : 210 - 213
  • [25] Illegal hunting in Jordan: using social media to assess impacts on wildlife
    Eid, Ehab
    Handal, Ramzi
    ORYX, 2018, 52 (04) : 730 - 735
  • [26] Dismantling the poachernomics of the illegal wildlife trade
    Di Minin, Enrico
    't Sas-Rolfes, Michael
    Selier, Jeanetta
    Louis, Maxi
    Bradshaw, Corey J. A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 265
  • [27] The Fight Against Illegal Wildlife Trade
    Koukoushkina, A., V
    MGIMO REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2011, (04): : 233 - 239
  • [28] Global clampdown on illegal wildlife trade
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2010, 167 (20) : 765 - 765
  • [29] Illegal wildlife trade: Look to the elephants
    Wittemyer, George
    SCIENCE, 2016, 353 (6307) : 1507 - 1507
  • [30] Infectious Diseases and the Illegal Wildlife Trade
    Gomez, Andre
    Aguirre, A. Alonso
    ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND EMERGING DISEASES: PREDICTION AND PREVENTION, 2008, 1149 : 16 - 19