MetaDetect: Uncertainty Quantification and Prediction Quality Estimates for Object Detection

被引:4
|
作者
Schubert, Marius [1 ]
Kahl, Karsten [1 ]
Rottmann, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wuppertal, Dept Math, Wuppertal, Germany
来源
2021 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN) | 2021年
关键词
BAYESIAN FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9534289
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In object detection with deep neural networks, the box-wise objectness score tends to be overconfident, sometimes even indicating high confidence in presence of incorrect predictions. Hence, the reliability of the prediction and therefore reliable uncertainties are of highest interest. In this work, we present a post processing method that for any given neural network provides predictive uncertainty and quality estimates. These estimates are learned by a post processing model that receives as input a hand-crafted set of transparent metrics in form of a structured dataset. From this set we learn two tasks for predicted bounding boxes. We discriminate between true positives (IoU >= 0.5) and false positives (IoU < 0.5) which we term meta classification, and we predict IoU values directly which we term meta regression. The probabilities of the meta classification model aim to learn the probabilities of success and failure and therefore provide a modelled predictive uncertainty estimate. Moreover, meta regression gives rise to a quality estimate. In numerical experiments, we use the publicly available YOLOv3 network and the Faster-RCNN network and evaluate meta classification and regression performance on the Kitti, Pascal VOC and COCO datasets. We demonstrate that our metrics are indeed well correlated with the IoU. For meta classification we obtain classification accuracies of up to 99.61% and AUROCs of up to 99.84%. For meta regression we obtain an R-2 value of up to 91.78%. These results yield significant improvements compared to the network's objectness score and other baseline approaches. Therefore, we obtain more reliable uncertainty and quality estimates which is particularly interesting in the absence of ground truth.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An uncertainty quantification method for nanomaterial prediction models
    O. Arda Vanli
    Li-Jen Chen
    Chao-his Tsai
    Chuck Zhang
    Ben Wang
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 70 : 33 - 44
  • [22] Uncertainty Quantification for Meningococcus B Carriers Prediction
    Acedo, Luis
    Burgos, Clara
    Cortes, Juan-Carlos
    Villanueva, Rafael J.
    BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, IWBBIO 2017, PT II, 2017, 10209 : 560 - 569
  • [23] Leveraging Monte Carlo Dropout for Uncertainty Quantification in Real-Time Object Detection of Autonomous Vehicles
    Zhao, Rui
    Wang, Kui
    Xiao, Yang
    Gao, Fei
    Gao, Zhenhai
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 33384 - 33399
  • [24] Games of Timing with Detection Uncertainty and Numerical Estimates
    Bednarz, David B.
    Muench, Paul L.
    Krupansky, Nicholas A.
    von Stengel, Bernhard
    UNMANNED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY XXI, 2019, 11021
  • [25] On the Uncertainty Quantification of the Quality Factor of Reverberation Chambers
    Arnaut, Luk R.
    Besnier, Philippe
    Sol, Jerome
    Andries, Mihai Ionut
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2019, 61 (03) : 823 - 832
  • [26] Modeling Aleatoric Uncertainty for Camouflaged Object Detection
    Liu, Jiawei
    Zhang, Jing
    Barnes, Nick
    2022 IEEE WINTER CONFERENCE ON APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTER VISION (WACV 2022), 2022, : 2613 - 2622
  • [27] Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Camouflaged Object Detection
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhang, Jing
    Hamidouche, Wassim
    Deforges, Olivier
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2023, 32 : 3580 - 3591
  • [28] An Uncertainty Estimation Framework for Probabilistic Object Detection
    Lyu, Zongyao
    Gutierrez, Nolan B.
    Beksi, William J.
    2021 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (CASE), 2021, : 1441 - 1446
  • [29] Uncertainty quantification of fragility and risk estimates due to seismic input variability and capacity model uncertainty
    Skoulidou, Despoina
    Romao, Xavier
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 195 : 425 - 437
  • [30] Assessment of Prediction Uncertainty Quantification Methods in Systems Biology
    Villaverde, Alejandro F.
    Raimundez, Elba
    Hasenauer, Jan
    Banga, Julio R.
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 20 (03) : 1725 - 1736