Assessment of Prediction Uncertainty Quantification Methods in Systems Biology

被引:8
|
作者
Villaverde, Alejandro F. [1 ,2 ]
Raimundez, Elba [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hasenauer, Jan [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Banga, Julio R. [6 ]
机构
[1] CITMAga, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Galicia, Spain
[2] Univ Vigo, Dept Syst & Control Engn, Vigo 36310, Galicia, Spain
[3] Univ Bonn, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Ctr Math, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[5] Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
[6] MBG CSIC, Biol Mission Galicia Spanish Natl Res Council, Computat Biol Lab, Pontevedra 36143, Galicia, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Uncertainty; Biological system modeling; Mathematical models; Predictive models; Computational modeling; Data models; Uncertain systems; Computational methods; dynamic models; nonlinear systems; observability; prediction error methods; state estimation; uncertainty; NETWORKS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1109/TCBB.2022.3213914
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Biological processes are often modelled using ordinary differential equations. The unknown parameters of these models are estimated by optimizing the fit of model simulation and experimental data. The resulting parameter estimates inevitably possess some degree of uncertainty. In practical applications it is important to quantify these parameter uncertainties as well as the resulting prediction uncertainty, which are uncertainties of potentially time-dependent model characteristics. Unfortunately, estimating prediction uncertainties accurately is nontrivial, due to the nonlinear dependence of model characteristics on parameters. While a number of numerical approaches have been proposed for this task, their strengths and weaknesses have not been systematically assessed yet. To fill this knowledge gap, we apply four state of the art methods for uncertainty quantification to four case studies of different computational complexities. This reveals the trade-offs between their applicability and their statistical interpretability. Our results provide guidelines for choosing the most appropriate technique for a given problem and applying it successfully.
引用
收藏
页码:1725 / 1736
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Prediction Uncertainty in Systems Biology
    Villaverde, Alejandro F.
    Raimundez, Elba
    Hasenauer, Jan
    Banga, Julio R.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (26): : 45 - 51
  • [2] REVIEW OF HYBRID EMISSIONS PREDICTION TOOLS AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION METHODS FOR GAS TURBINE COMBUSTION SYSTEMS
    Yousefian, Sajjad
    Bourque, Gilles
    Monaghan, Rory F. D.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2017, VOL 4B, 2017,
  • [3] Prediction and the quantification of uncertainty
    Dept. of Appl. Math. and Statistics, University at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3600, United States
    不详
    [J]. Phys D Nonlinear Phenom, 1-4 (152-170):
  • [4] Prediction and the quantification of uncertainty
    Glimm, J
    Sharp, DH
    [J]. PHYSICA D, 1999, 133 (1-4): : 152 - 170
  • [5] Collaborative framework for PIV uncertainty quantification: comparative assessment of methods
    Sciacchitano, Andrea
    Neal, Douglas R.
    Smith, Barton L.
    Warner, Scott O.
    Vlachos, Pavlos P.
    Wieneke, Bernhard
    Scarano, Fulvio
    [J]. MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 26 (07)
  • [6] Prediction uncertainty assessment of a systems biology model requires a sample of the full probability distribution of its parameters
    van Mourik, Simon
    ter Braak, Cajo
    Stigter, Hans
    Molenaar, Jaap
    [J]. PEERJ, 2014, 2
  • [7] Implementation of Multidisciplinary and Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Sonic Boom Prediction
    Tekaslan, Huseyin Emre
    Yildiz, Sihmehmet
    Demiroglu, Yusuf
    Nikbay, Melike
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2023, 60 (02): : 410 - 422
  • [8] Implementation of Multidisciplinary and Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Sonic Boom Prediction
    Tekaslan, Huseyin Emre
    Yildiz, Sihmehmet
    Demiroglu, Yusuf
    Nikbay, Melike
    [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1600, 60 (02): : 410 - 422
  • [9] Virtual experiments for the assessment of data analysis and uncertainty quantification methods in scatterometry
    Kok, Gertjan
    van Dijk, Marcel
    Wuebbeler, Gerd
    Elster, Clemens
    [J]. METROLOGIA, 2023, 60 (04)
  • [10] NUMERICAL METHODS FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Chernov, Alexey
    Nobile, Fabio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2015, 5 (03) : VII - VIII