Test-retest reliability of the Greek Speech-in-babble test (SinB) as a potential screening tool for auditory processing disorder

被引:4
|
作者
Sofokleous, Valentinos [1 ,2 ]
Marmara, Maria [1 ]
Panagiotopoulos, Georgios K. [1 ]
Mouza, Stellina [1 ]
Tsofidou, Maria [1 ]
Sereti, Afroditi [1 ]
Grigoriadi, Ioanna [1 ]
Petridis, Eleftherios [1 ]
Sidiras, Christos [1 ]
Tsiourdas, Michael [1 ]
Iliadou, Vasiliki [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Med Sch, Psychoacoust Lab, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Athens Childrens Hosp P&A Kyriacou, Dept Pediat Otorhinolaryngol, Levadias St, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
Speech-in-noise; Speech perception; Hearing; Auditory processing disorder; Screening; WORD-RECOGNITION; NORMAL-HEARING; TEST BATTERY; CHILDREN; NOISE; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109848
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: There seems to exist a specific group of people considered to be at higher risk of having Auditory Processing Disorders (APD). These patients are frequently initially referred to, or managed by various professionals such as Otolaryngologists, Speech Therapists, and Occupational Therapists. It is, therefore, essential to retain a low threshold of when to refer such individuals for a formal APD diagnostic evaluation. Under these circumstances, there might be a role for the Greek Speech-in-Babble (SinB) recognition WA as a screening tool for abnormal auditory processing competency. Objective: To explore the WA-retest reliability of a diagnostically validated speech-in-babble test, the Greek SinB, as a potential screening tool. Methods: Ten health professionals coming from various disciplines administered the SinB WA twice, under conditions similar to those encountered when using it as a screening tool, and test-retest reliability was assessed. 93 Greek-speaking individuals, of whom 27 adults and 66 children or young adolescents aged five years old or more, served as our study sample. Results: For the right ear, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was 0.858 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.786-0.906. Slightly better conditions apply for the left ear, as the ICC was 0.873 with 95% CI = 0.809-0.916. These 95% CIs indicate a 'good' to 'excellent' level of reliability for both ears. Spearman's rho was 0.86 and 0.71 for the right and left ear, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the WA possesses the required reliability to evaluate a subject's hearing abilities under screening conditions. On these terms, it could be used to screen populations considered as being at risk for Auditory Processing Disorders. Forthcoming research should focus on establishing its efficiency by comparing the results of the screening WA with that of diagnostic tests and on fine-tuning SinB as a screening tool.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Test-Retest Reliability of a Serious Game for Delirium Screening in the Emergency Department
    Tong, Tiffany
    Chignell, Mark
    Tierney, Mary C.
    Lee, Jacques S.
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 8
  • [42] Test-retest reliability of speech-evoked auditory brainstem response in healthy children at a low sensation level
    Zakaria, Mohd Normani
    Jalaei, Bahram
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 102 : 28 - 31
  • [43] Validation of EEG Pre-processing Pipeline by Test-Retest Reliability
    Ximena Suarez-Revelo, Jazmin
    Fredy Ochoa-Gomez, John
    Andres Tobon-Quintero, Carlos
    APPLIED COMPUTER SCIENCES IN ENGINEERING, WEA 2018, PT II, 2018, 916 : 290 - 299
  • [44] Test-retest reliability of prepulse inhibition paradigm using auditory evoked potentials
    Takeuchi, Nobuyuki
    Kinukawa, Tomoaki
    Sugiyama, Shunsuke
    Inui, Koji
    Nishihara, Makoto
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2021, 170 : 187 - 194
  • [45] Test-retest reliability of the Battery for the Assessment of Auditory Sensorimotor and Timing Abilities (BAASTA)
    Begel, Valentin
    Verga, Laura
    Benoit, Charles-Etienne
    Kotz, Sonja A.
    Dalla Bella, Simone
    ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2018, 61 (06) : 395 - 400
  • [46] Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Recorded Brainstem versus Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Speech
    Bidelman, Gavin M.
    Pousson, Monique
    Dugas, Calli
    Fehrenbach, Amy
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) : 164 - 174
  • [47] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE TEST FOR AUDITORY COMPREHENSION OF LANGUAGE WHEN IT IS USED WITH MENTALLY-RETARDED CHILDREN
    ANDERSON, JD
    HESS, R
    RICHARDSON, K
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1980, 45 (02): : 195 - 199
  • [48] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF A DICHOTIC DIGITS TEST FOR ASSESSING CENTRAL AUDITORY FUNCTION IN ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE
    STROUSE, AL
    HALL, JW
    AUDIOLOGY, 1995, 34 (02): : 85 - 90
  • [49] Test-retest reliability, feasibility and clinical correlates of the Eurofit test battery in people with bipolar disorder
    Vancampfort, Davy
    Sienaert, Pascal
    Wyckaert, Sabine
    De Hert, Marc
    Stubbs, Brendon
    Rosenbaum, Simon
    Buys, Roselien
    Probst, Michel
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2015, 228 (03) : 620 - 625
  • [50] Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability
    Shen, Yi
    Yun, Donghyeon
    Liu, Yi
    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020, 148 (03): : 1647 - 1662