Test-retest reliability of the Greek Speech-in-babble test (SinB) as a potential screening tool for auditory processing disorder

被引:4
|
作者
Sofokleous, Valentinos [1 ,2 ]
Marmara, Maria [1 ]
Panagiotopoulos, Georgios K. [1 ]
Mouza, Stellina [1 ]
Tsofidou, Maria [1 ]
Sereti, Afroditi [1 ]
Grigoriadi, Ioanna [1 ]
Petridis, Eleftherios [1 ]
Sidiras, Christos [1 ]
Tsiourdas, Michael [1 ]
Iliadou, Vasiliki [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Med Sch, Psychoacoust Lab, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Athens Childrens Hosp P&A Kyriacou, Dept Pediat Otorhinolaryngol, Levadias St, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
Speech-in-noise; Speech perception; Hearing; Auditory processing disorder; Screening; WORD-RECOGNITION; NORMAL-HEARING; TEST BATTERY; CHILDREN; NOISE; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109848
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: There seems to exist a specific group of people considered to be at higher risk of having Auditory Processing Disorders (APD). These patients are frequently initially referred to, or managed by various professionals such as Otolaryngologists, Speech Therapists, and Occupational Therapists. It is, therefore, essential to retain a low threshold of when to refer such individuals for a formal APD diagnostic evaluation. Under these circumstances, there might be a role for the Greek Speech-in-Babble (SinB) recognition WA as a screening tool for abnormal auditory processing competency. Objective: To explore the WA-retest reliability of a diagnostically validated speech-in-babble test, the Greek SinB, as a potential screening tool. Methods: Ten health professionals coming from various disciplines administered the SinB WA twice, under conditions similar to those encountered when using it as a screening tool, and test-retest reliability was assessed. 93 Greek-speaking individuals, of whom 27 adults and 66 children or young adolescents aged five years old or more, served as our study sample. Results: For the right ear, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was 0.858 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.786-0.906. Slightly better conditions apply for the left ear, as the ICC was 0.873 with 95% CI = 0.809-0.916. These 95% CIs indicate a 'good' to 'excellent' level of reliability for both ears. Spearman's rho was 0.86 and 0.71 for the right and left ear, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the WA possesses the required reliability to evaluate a subject's hearing abilities under screening conditions. On these terms, it could be used to screen populations considered as being at risk for Auditory Processing Disorders. Forthcoming research should focus on establishing its efficiency by comparing the results of the screening WA with that of diagnostic tests and on fine-tuning SinB as a screening tool.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Test-retest reliability of PsyCheck: a mental health screening tool for substance use treatment clients
    Jenner, Linda
    Cameron, Jacqui
    Lee, Nicole K.
    Nielsen, Suzanne
    ADVANCES IN DUAL DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 6 (04) : 168 - 175
  • [32] The test-retest reliability of the respiratory-related evoked potential
    Herzog, Michaela
    Sucec, Josef
    Jelincic, Valentina
    Van Diest, Ilse
    Van den Bergh, Omer
    Chan, Pei-Ying S.
    Davenport, Paul
    von Leupoldt, Andreas
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 163
  • [33] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIAL PARAMETERS
    STRENGE, H
    EEG-EMG-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ELEKTROENZEPHALOGRAPHIE ELEKTROMYOGRAPHIE UND VERWANDTE GEBIETE, 1989, 20 (03): : 147 - 152
  • [34] The vestibular evoked myogenic potential: A test-retest reliability study
    Maes, Leen
    Vinck, Bart M.
    De Vel, Eddy
    D'haenens, Wendy
    Bockstael, Annelies
    Keppler, Hannah
    Philips, Birgit
    Swinnen, Freya
    Dhooge, Ingeborg
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (03) : 594 - 600
  • [36] Domain-general auditory processing as a conceptual and measurement framework for second language speech learning aptitude: A test-retest reliability study
    Saito, Kazuya
    Tierney, Adam
    STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2024, 46 (04) : 1206 - 1230
  • [37] Test-retest reliability of the questionnaire in the Sasang constitutional analysis tool (SCAT)
    Lee, Jeongyun
    Yim, Mi Hong
    Kim, Jong Yeol
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (02) : 136 - 140
  • [38] Test-Retest Reliability of an Experienced Global Trigger Tool Review Team
    Bjorn, Brian
    Anhoj, Jacob
    ostergaard, Mette
    Kodal, Anne Marie
    von Plessen, Christian
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2021, 17 (07) : E593 - E598
  • [39] Test-retest reliability of the evaluation tool of children's handwriting manuscript
    Diekema, SM
    Deitz, J
    Amundson, SJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1998, 52 (04): : 248 - 255
  • [40] Test-retest reliability of Kannada time-compressed speech test and time-compressed monosyllables test
    Prabhu, Prashanth
    Seshadri, Danush
    Ganeshan, Aishwarya
    Babu, Liny
    HEARING BALANCE AND COMMUNICATION, 2016, 14 (03) : 111 - 116