Test-retest reliability of the Greek Speech-in-babble test (SinB) as a potential screening tool for auditory processing disorder

被引:4
|
作者
Sofokleous, Valentinos [1 ,2 ]
Marmara, Maria [1 ]
Panagiotopoulos, Georgios K. [1 ]
Mouza, Stellina [1 ]
Tsofidou, Maria [1 ]
Sereti, Afroditi [1 ]
Grigoriadi, Ioanna [1 ]
Petridis, Eleftherios [1 ]
Sidiras, Christos [1 ]
Tsiourdas, Michael [1 ]
Iliadou, Vasiliki [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Med Sch, Psychoacoust Lab, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Athens Childrens Hosp P&A Kyriacou, Dept Pediat Otorhinolaryngol, Levadias St, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
Speech-in-noise; Speech perception; Hearing; Auditory processing disorder; Screening; WORD-RECOGNITION; NORMAL-HEARING; TEST BATTERY; CHILDREN; NOISE; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109848
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: There seems to exist a specific group of people considered to be at higher risk of having Auditory Processing Disorders (APD). These patients are frequently initially referred to, or managed by various professionals such as Otolaryngologists, Speech Therapists, and Occupational Therapists. It is, therefore, essential to retain a low threshold of when to refer such individuals for a formal APD diagnostic evaluation. Under these circumstances, there might be a role for the Greek Speech-in-Babble (SinB) recognition WA as a screening tool for abnormal auditory processing competency. Objective: To explore the WA-retest reliability of a diagnostically validated speech-in-babble test, the Greek SinB, as a potential screening tool. Methods: Ten health professionals coming from various disciplines administered the SinB WA twice, under conditions similar to those encountered when using it as a screening tool, and test-retest reliability was assessed. 93 Greek-speaking individuals, of whom 27 adults and 66 children or young adolescents aged five years old or more, served as our study sample. Results: For the right ear, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was 0.858 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.786-0.906. Slightly better conditions apply for the left ear, as the ICC was 0.873 with 95% CI = 0.809-0.916. These 95% CIs indicate a 'good' to 'excellent' level of reliability for both ears. Spearman's rho was 0.86 and 0.71 for the right and left ear, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the WA possesses the required reliability to evaluate a subject's hearing abilities under screening conditions. On these terms, it could be used to screen populations considered as being at risk for Auditory Processing Disorders. Forthcoming research should focus on establishing its efficiency by comparing the results of the screening WA with that of diagnostic tests and on fine-tuning SinB as a screening tool.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Test-retest reliability of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test
    Winkler, A.
    Holube, I.
    HNO, 2016, 64 (08) : 564 - 571
  • [2] Test-retest reliability of the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response
    Song, Judy H.
    Nicol, Trent
    Kraus, Nina
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 122 (02) : 346 - 355
  • [3] Development and test-retest reliability of a screening tool for axial spondyloarthritis
    Shridharmurthy, Divya
    Lapane, Kate L.
    Khan, Sara
    Yi, Esther
    Baek, Jonggyu
    Kay, Jonathan
    Liu, Shao-Hsien
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (07):
  • [4] Development and test-retest reliability of a screening tool for axial spondyloarthritis
    Shridharmurthy, Divya
    Lapane, Kate L.
    Khan, Sara
    Yi, Esther
    Baek, Jonggyu
    Kay, Jonathan
    Liu, Shao-Hsien
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [5] THE TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE MCCARTHY SCREENING-TEST
    UMANSKY, W
    PAGET, KD
    COHEN, LR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 37 (03) : 650 - 654
  • [6] Evaluating the reliability of an injury prevention screening tool: Test-retest study
    Gittelman, Michael A.
    Kincaid, Madeline
    Denny, Sarah
    Arnold, Melissa Wervey
    FitzGerald, Michael
    Carle, Adam C.
    Mara, Constance A.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2016, 81 (04): : S8 - S13
  • [7] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY FOR THE EATING DISORDER INVENTORY
    WEAR, RW
    PRATZ, O
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 1987, 6 (06) : 767 - 769
  • [8] Test-retest reliability of the eating disorder examination
    Rizvi, SL
    Peterson, CB
    Crow, SJ
    Agras, WS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2000, 28 (03) : 311 - 316
  • [9] Test-retest reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a masker of noise or babble in children with hearing impairment
    Lovett, Rosemary
    Summerfield, Quentin
    Vickers, Deborah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2013, 52 (06) : 377 - 384
  • [10] Test-Retest Reliability in Infant Speech Perception Tasks
    Cristia, Alejandrina
    Seidl, Amanda
    Singh, Leher
    Houston, Derek
    INFANCY, 2016, 21 (05) : 648 - 667