Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Wenli [1 ]
Looi, Chee-Kit [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Learning Sci Lab, Singapore 637616, Singapore
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper discusses an innovative blended learning strategy which incorporates online discussion in both in-class face to face, and off-classroom settings. Online discussion in a face to face class is compared with its two counterparts, off-class online discussion as well as in-class, face to face oral discussion, to examine the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed strategy. By integrating online discussion into the flow of the classroom, learners are given dedicated time to foster a habit of critical thinking, reflection and articulating these online, which can subsequently seed further in-class oral discussions, and off-class online discussions. It is found that in-class, online discussion can provide a wider spectrum of discussion perspectives, equalise participation in discussion, and promote cognitive thinking skills and in depth information processing. However, the lack of face to face interactions and the need for sufficient time to do online postings pose challenges in implementing online discussion for face to face classroom learning.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 326
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of online/face-to-face students' and instructor's experiences: Examining blended synchronous learning effects
    Szeto, Elson
    [J]. 5TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 2014, 116 : 4250 - 4254
  • [32] Hybrid learning, blended learning or face-to-face learning: which one is more effective in remediating misconception?
    Hermita, Neni
    Erlisnawati
    Alim, Jesi Alexander
    Putra, Zetra Hainul
    Mahartika, Ira
    Sulistiyo, Urip
    [J]. QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2024, 32 (01) : 64 - 78
  • [33] Instruments to explore blended learning: Modifying a method to analyse online communication for the analysis of face-to-face communication
    de Leng, Bas A.
    Dolmans, Diana H. J. M.
    Donkers, H. H. L. M.
    Muijtjens, Arno M. M.
    van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 55 (02) : 644 - 651
  • [34] Relation Learning - A New Approach to Face Recognition
    Bui, Len
    Dat Tran
    Huang, Xu
    Chetty, Girija
    [J]. ADVANCED CONCEPTS FOR INTELLIGENT VISION SYSTEMS, 2011, 6915 : 566 - 575
  • [35] Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student-group interactions in a blended learning course
    Shu, Hang
    Gu, Xiaoqing
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 39 : 13 - 21
  • [36] Foundations of Nursing: Comparing Face-to-Face Versus Blended Learning
    Perez, Amelia
    Andrews, Angela
    Reed, Amy
    Patino, Jasmin
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 43 (05) : 309 - 311
  • [37] How 'blended' is blended learning?: Students' perceptions of issues around the integration of online and face-to-face learning in a continuing professional development (CPD) health care context
    Glogowska, Margaret
    Young, Pat
    Lockyer, Lesley
    Moule, Pam
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2011, 31 (08) : 887 - 891
  • [38] Student learning performance and satisfaction with traditional face-to-face classroom versus online learning: Evidence from teaching Statistics for Business
    Lin, Tin-Chun
    [J]. E-LEARNING AND DIGITAL MEDIA, 2022, 19 (03) : 340 - 360
  • [39] When hybrid learning meets blended teaching: Online computer-mediated communication (CMC) discourse and classroom face-to-face (FTF) discourse analysis
    Xu, Zhichang
    [J]. HYBRID LEARNING AND EDUCATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5169 : 157 - +
  • [40] BLENDED LEARNING: CHANGING FACE OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT
    Kogovsek, Metka
    Kogovsek, Mojca
    [J]. EDULEARN13: 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, : 809 - 818