Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Wenli [1 ]
Looi, Chee-Kit [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Learning Sci Lab, Singapore 637616, Singapore
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper discusses an innovative blended learning strategy which incorporates online discussion in both in-class face to face, and off-classroom settings. Online discussion in a face to face class is compared with its two counterparts, off-class online discussion as well as in-class, face to face oral discussion, to examine the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed strategy. By integrating online discussion into the flow of the classroom, learners are given dedicated time to foster a habit of critical thinking, reflection and articulating these online, which can subsequently seed further in-class oral discussions, and off-class online discussions. It is found that in-class, online discussion can provide a wider spectrum of discussion perspectives, equalise participation in discussion, and promote cognitive thinking skills and in depth information processing. However, the lack of face to face interactions and the need for sufficient time to do online postings pose challenges in implementing online discussion for face to face classroom learning.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 326
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transitioning from Face-to-Face to Blended and Full Online Learning Engineering Master's Program
    Martinez, Pedro Juan
    Aguilar, Francisco Javier
    Ortiz, Mario
    [J]. Ortiz, Mario (mortiz@umh.es), 1600, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., United States (63): : 2 - 9
  • [22] Transitioning From Face-to-Face to Blended and Full Online Learning Engineering Master's Program
    Juan Martinez, Pedro
    Javier Aguilar, Francisco
    Ortiz, Mario
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2020, 63 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [23] Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning
    Kemp, Nenagh
    Grieve, Rachel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [24] Our Journey From Face-to-Face to Blended Learning Approach: Important Lessons Learned
    Cheung, Wing Sum
    Hew, Khe Foon
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELEARNING, 2012, : 27 - 31
  • [25] The Changing Face of Language Learning: Learning Beyond the Classroom
    Richards, Jack C.
    [J]. RELC JOURNAL, 2015, 46 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [26] Redesigning face to face simulation into interactive online learning
    Jowsey, Tanisha
    Lee, Jihyun
    Piggin, Gabrielle
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 55 (05) : 656 - 656
  • [27] The effect of online and face-to-face active learning methods on learning attitudes
    Ozozturk, Sevcan
    Guler, Buse
    Bilgic, Dilek
    Ozberk, Huelya
    Yagcan, Hande
    Tokat, Merlinda Alus
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2023, 129
  • [28] A comparative study on student perceptions of face-to-face learning and online learning
    Can, Gurhan
    Saglam, Mustafa
    Eristi, Bahadir
    Kurum, Dilruba
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (EDU'07): NEW HORIZONS IN EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2007, : 41 - +
  • [29] Case Based Learning for Therapeutics Student's performance in Face to Face vs Blended Learning
    Jesus, Angelo
    Gomes, Maria Joao
    Cruz, Agostinho
    [J]. 2016 11TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2016,
  • [30] A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments
    Dziuban, Charles
    Moskal, Patsy
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 14 (04): : 236 - 241