Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis

被引:69
|
作者
Chaddad, Ahmad [1 ,2 ]
Niazi, Tamim [1 ]
Probst, Stephan [3 ]
Bladou, Franck [4 ]
Anidjar, Maurice [4 ]
Bahoric, Boris [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Div Radiat Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] ETS, Dept Automated Prod Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Div Nucl Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Urol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 8卷
关键词
biomarkers; classification; gleason score; radiomics; prostate cancer; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; MORTALITY; FEATURES; HETEROGENEITY; RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2018.00630
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Use of quantitative imaging features and encoding the intra-tumoral heterogeneity from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the prediction of Gleason score is gaining attention as a non-invasive biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa). This study tested the hypothesis that radiomic features, extracted from mpMRI, could predict the Gleason score pattern of patients with PCa. Methods: This analysis included T2-weighted (T2-WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, computed from diffusion-weighted imaging) scans of 99 PCa patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). A total of 41 radiomic features were calculated from a local tumor sub-volume (i.e., regions of interest) that is determined by a centroid coordinate of PCa volume, grouped based on their Gleason score patterns. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman's rank correlation tests were used to identify features related to Gleason score groups. Randomforest (RF) classifier model was used to predict Gleason score groups and identify the most important signature among the 41 radiomic features. Results: Gleason score groups could be discriminated based on zone size percentage, large zone size emphasis and zone size non-uniformity values (p < 0.05). These features also showed a significant correlation between radiomic features and Gleason score groups with a correlation value of -0.35, 0.32, 0.42 for the large zone size emphasis, zone size non-uniformity and zone size percentage, respectively (corrected p < 0.05). RF classifier model achieved an average of the area under the curves of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of 83.40, 72.71, and 77.35% to predict Gleason score groups (G1) = 6; 6 < (G2) < (3 + 4) and (G3) >= 4 + 3, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the radiomic features can be used as a non-invasive biomarker to predict the Gleason score of the PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFECT OF TUMOR VOLUME AND PRESENCE OF GLEASON PATTERN 3 IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS WITH GLEASON SCORE 8 ON PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY
    Ginsburg, Kevin
    Silverman, Michael
    Livingstone, Joan
    Smith, Daryn
    Heilbrun, Lance
    Cher, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E705 - E705
  • [42] Using the Gleason score as a prostate cancer prognostic factor: Leave seven alone
    Qian, J
    Burke, HB
    Hoang, A
    Ma, J
    Bostwick, DG
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) : 177A - 177A
  • [43] Gleason Score Evolution and the Effect on Prostate Cancer Outcomes
    Swanson, Gregory P.
    Trevathan, Sean
    Hammonds, Kendall A. P.
    Speights, V. O.
    Hermans, Michael R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 155 (05) : 711 - 717
  • [44] The Value of the Gleason Score and the Initial PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) Level in Predicting the Results of Bone Scan in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer
    Habbache, M.
    Naili, Q.
    Abdi, M.
    Said, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (SUPPL 1) : S600 - S600
  • [46] Molecular biological analysis of the heterogeneous prostate cancer group gleason score 7
    Mian, Christine
    Lodde, Michele
    Comploj, Evi
    Palermo, Salvatore
    Lusuardi, Lukas
    Marziani, Fiovo
    Chiocchetti, Andreas
    Spada, Alessandra
    Mian, Michael
    Pycha, Armin
    PROSTATE, 2006, 66 (09): : 966 - 970
  • [47] BRE score in breast cancer, Gleason score in prostate cancer and tumor budding score in colorectal cancer?
    Karamitopoulou, E.
    Kondi-Pafiti, A.
    Koelzer, V.
    Karandrea, D.
    Gennatas, K.
    Patsouris, E.
    Zlobec, I.
    Lugli, A.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2011, 459 : S155 - S155
  • [49] ESTABLISHMENT OF A MODEL FOR PREDICTING GLEASON SCORE ≥ 7 BEFORE PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Yu, Z.
    Liu, Y.
    Guo, J. N.
    Yuan, Y. Q.
    Li, Z. S.
    Yuan, Q.
    Liu, Y. F.
    Zhao, C. B.
    Fang, J. Q.
    Xiao, K. F.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2019, 33 (04): : 1113 - 1118
  • [50] GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING AND PROSTATE CANCER: USING MOLECULAR BASIS OF EARLY PROSTATE CANCER TO IMPROVE ON GLEASON SCORE
    Iddawela, Mahesh
    Boyd, Sarah
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Risbridger, Gail
    Nim, Hiue
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 12 : 50 - 50