Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis

被引:69
|
作者
Chaddad, Ahmad [1 ,2 ]
Niazi, Tamim [1 ]
Probst, Stephan [3 ]
Bladou, Franck [4 ]
Anidjar, Maurice [4 ]
Bahoric, Boris [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Div Radiat Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] ETS, Dept Automated Prod Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Div Nucl Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Urol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 8卷
关键词
biomarkers; classification; gleason score; radiomics; prostate cancer; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; MORTALITY; FEATURES; HETEROGENEITY; RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2018.00630
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Use of quantitative imaging features and encoding the intra-tumoral heterogeneity from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the prediction of Gleason score is gaining attention as a non-invasive biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa). This study tested the hypothesis that radiomic features, extracted from mpMRI, could predict the Gleason score pattern of patients with PCa. Methods: This analysis included T2-weighted (T2-WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, computed from diffusion-weighted imaging) scans of 99 PCa patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). A total of 41 radiomic features were calculated from a local tumor sub-volume (i.e., regions of interest) that is determined by a centroid coordinate of PCa volume, grouped based on their Gleason score patterns. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman's rank correlation tests were used to identify features related to Gleason score groups. Randomforest (RF) classifier model was used to predict Gleason score groups and identify the most important signature among the 41 radiomic features. Results: Gleason score groups could be discriminated based on zone size percentage, large zone size emphasis and zone size non-uniformity values (p < 0.05). These features also showed a significant correlation between radiomic features and Gleason score groups with a correlation value of -0.35, 0.32, 0.42 for the large zone size emphasis, zone size non-uniformity and zone size percentage, respectively (corrected p < 0.05). RF classifier model achieved an average of the area under the curves of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of 83.40, 72.71, and 77.35% to predict Gleason score groups (G1) = 6; 6 < (G2) < (3 + 4) and (G3) >= 4 + 3, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the radiomic features can be used as a non-invasive biomarker to predict the Gleason score of the PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association between the dihydrotestosterone level in the prostate and prostate cancer aggressiveness using the gleason score
    Nishiyama, Tsutomu
    Ikarashi, Toshihiko
    Hashimoto, Yutaka
    Suzuki, Kazuya
    Takahashi, Kota
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (04): : 1387 - 1391
  • [22] Association between the dihydrotestosterone level in the prostate and prostate cancer aggressiveness using the Gleason score
    Nishiyama, T
    Ikarashi, T
    Hashimoto, Y
    Suzuki, K
    Takahashi, K
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 136 - 136
  • [23] Prostate Gleason Score Detection by Calibrated Machine Learning Classification through Radiomic Features
    Mercaldo, Francesco
    Brunese, Maria Chiara
    Merolla, Francesco
    Rocca, Aldo
    Zappia, Marcello
    Santone, Antonella
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (23):
  • [24] Lineage Relationships of Gleason Patterns in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer
    Cheville, J. C.
    Kovtun, I. V.
    Murphy, S. J.
    Johnson, S. H.
    Zarei, S.
    Kosari, F.
    Sukov, W.
    Castellar, E. J. Parilla
    Karnes, R. J.
    Vasmatzis, G.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 202A - 202A
  • [25] Lineage Relationship of Gleason Patterns in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer
    Kovtun, Irina V.
    Cheville, John C.
    Murphy, Stephen J.
    Johnson, Sarah H.
    Zarei, Shabnam
    Kosari, Farhad
    Sukov, William R.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Vasmatzis, George
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73 (11) : 3275 - 3284
  • [26] Lineage Relationships of Gleason Patterns in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer
    Cheville, J. C.
    Kovtun, I. V.
    Murphy, S. J.
    Johnson, S. H.
    Zarei, S.
    Kosari, F.
    Sukov, W.
    Castellar, E. J. Parilla
    Karnes, R. J.
    Vasmatzis, G.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 202A - 202A
  • [27] PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS WITH GLEASON SCORE 6 OR LOWER
    Ha, Hong Koo
    Ku, Ja Yoon
    Lee, Jeong Zoo
    Chung, Moon Kee
    Chung, Jae Min
    Kang, Dong Ii
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E607 - E607
  • [28] Non-Invasive Pathological Gleason Score Prediction in Prostate Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Radiomic Features
    Vosoughi, Z.
    Hamzian, N.
    Geramifar, P.
    Vosoughi, H.
    Emami, F.
    Faraji, S.
    Hajianfar, G.
    Shiri, I.
    Zaidi, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 50 (SUPPL 1) : S719 - S720
  • [29] Radiomic Score as a Potential Imaging Biomarker for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cervical Cancer
    Li, Handong
    Zhu, Miaochen
    Jian, Lian
    Bi, Feng
    Zhang, Xiaoye
    Fang, Chao
    Wang, Ying
    Wang, Jing
    Wu, Nayiyuan
    Yu, Xiaoping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [30] Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: Implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer
    Sved, PD
    Gomez, P
    Manoharan, M
    Kim, SS
    Soloway, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (01): : 98 - 102