Potential Influencers Identification Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods

被引:12
|
作者
Gandhi, Meera [1 ]
Muruganantham, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sathyabama Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Madras 600119, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Sathyabama Univ, Madras 600119, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Influence Users; Facebook; TOPSIS; Social Influence; Social Network; Pugh technique;
D O I
10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.411
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods such as Pugh, technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) are discussed to identify the potential influencers in Social Media.. In Web 2.0 technology, every user is become major contributors in online social media. Social media sites like Facebook, Twitter are common phenomena for business organizations to offer business services to their customers. The amount of interaction generated at these social media sites are in the form like post, comments, Tweets, likes etc. influences the attitude and behaviour of others. It is important to monitor, estimate and engage the potential influencers who are most relevant to the brand, product or campaign are become important now. In this way, business enterprises could retain efforts aimed at sustaining the activity of influential users, who take minimal effort and resources to improve product sales and enhance their reputations to improve the business enterprise. In this article, a research framework was proposed to estimate the influencers in a social media site using Multi-criteria Decision Making ( MCDM) methods and compared the results. The proposed approach is more dynamic and capable of identifying the potential influencers preciously than using standard centrality measures, which are incapable to be applied in large-scale networks due to the computational complexity. The MCDM based approach effectiveness was tested using a Facebook datasets and the results were shown with existing algorithms such as degree, PageRank and centrality measures. Comparisons were made on the ranking of influencers to evaluate the performance of MCDM methods, in which TOPSIS outperforms other methods. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1179 / 1188
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Prioritization of Water Allocation for Adaptation to Climate Change Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)
    Parvin Golfam
    Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh
    Taher Rajaee
    Xuefeng Chu
    Water Resources Management, 2019, 33 : 3401 - 3416
  • [12] Selection of Construction Equipment by Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods
    Temiz, I.
    Calis, G.
    CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2017, CCC 2017, 2017, 196 : 286 - 293
  • [13] SAFETY OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS
    Dejus, Titas
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 17 (02) : 177 - 183
  • [14] Evaluating the sustainability of hotels using multi-criteria decision making methods
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Hoang-Phu Nguyen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 175 (03) : 129 - 140
  • [15] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270
  • [16] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Technique for Gradation of Jute Fibres
    Choudhuri P.K.
    Choudhuri, P.K. (pkc1@rediffmail.com), 1600, Springer (95): : 63 - 68
  • [17] Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Chemical and Process Engineering: Methods, Progress, and Potential
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    Nabavi, Seyed Reza
    Rangaiah, Gade Pandu
    Processes, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [18] Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study
    Ben-Arieh, D
    INTERFACES, 2002, 32 (02) : 81 - 83
  • [19] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR IDENTIFICATION OF UNBALANCED BIDDING
    Su, Limin
    Wang, Tianze
    Li, Huimin
    Cao, Yongchao
    Wang, Lunyan
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 26 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [20] Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods
    Bid, Sumanta
    Siddique, Giyasuddin
    HELIYON, 2019, 5 (06)