Quantifying injection solvent effects in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

被引:35
|
作者
VanMiddlesworth, Bradley J. [1 ]
Dorsey, John G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Hydrophobic subtraction model; Injection solvent; Diluent; Excess adsorption isotherm; HYDROPHOBIC-SUBTRACTION MODEL; EXCESS ADSORPTION-ISOTHERMS; MOBILE-PHASE; COLUMN SELECTIVITY; SAMPLE SOLVENT; ELUENT COMPONENTS; PERFORMANCE; RETENTION; VOLUME; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2012.02.075
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Peak distortion due to the injection was measured as a function of injection solvent strength, volume, mass, retention factor, and column selectivity. The concept of a method's sensitivity(s) to injection solvent strength was mathematically defined as a vector of theoretical plate counts compared to an ideal vector that does not change with injection solvent strength. Near ideal sensitivity (s > 0.90) was measured on all columns with all analytes in low volume injections of 1.25 mu L. Increasing the injection volume reduces the measured sensitivity from ideality to a greater extent than increasing the injection mass, with differing values for each column. Using column parameters measured from the hydrophobic-subtraction model and fitting parameters from the acetonitrile excess adsorption isotherm, differences among the columns studied are explained. Decreased ligand density and increased silanol activity provide a consistent peak shape with changes in injection volume or solvent strength. For method development, a quick test is suggested with the ratio of hydrophobic-subtraction column parameters, H/A, to predict the injection solvent sensitivity of a column. As H/A decreases, the sensitivity to injection solvent worsens. Sensitivity to organic modifiers other than acetonitrile are predicted with cited sorbed layer thickness, such that MeOH > EtOH > IPA approximate to THF approximate to MeCN, i.e., a strong MeOH diluent is more ideal (better) than a strong MeCN diluent. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 89
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of injection solvent choice on peak shape and resolution in reversed-phase flash chromatography
    Bickler, John
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [32] Surface diffusion in reversed-phase liquid chromatography
    Miyabe, Kanji
    Guiochon, Georges
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2010, 1217 (11) : 1713 - 1734
  • [33] How Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography Works
    Schure, Mark R.
    Rafferty, Jake L.
    Zhang, Ling
    Siepmann, J. Ilja
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 31 (08) : 630 - 637
  • [34] SELECTIVITY IN REVERSED-PHASE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY
    PETROVIC, SM
    LOMIC, S
    JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1989, 12 (1-2): : 59 - 75
  • [35] How Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography Works
    Schure, Mark R.
    Rafferty, Jake L.
    Zhang, Ling
    Siepmann, J. Ilja
    LC GC EUROPE, 2014, 27 (01) : 18 - +
  • [36] Shape Selectivity in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography
    Lippa, Katrice A.
    Rimmer, Catherine A.
    Sander, Lane C.
    ADVANCES IN CHROMATOGRAPHY, VOL 46, 2008, 46 : 235 - 303
  • [37] Simulating retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography
    Siepmann, J. Ilja
    Rafferty, Jake L.
    Sun, Li
    Schure, Mark R.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 233
  • [38] Orthogonal separations for reversed-phase liquid chromatography
    Pellett, J
    Lukulay, P
    Mao, Y
    Bowen, W
    Reed, R
    Ma, M
    Munger, RC
    Dolan, JW
    Wrisley, L
    Medwid, K
    Toltl, NP
    Chan, CC
    Skibic, M
    Biswas, K
    Wells, KA
    Snyder, LR
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1101 (1-2) : 122 - 135
  • [39] Reversed-phase liquid chromatography of lisinopril conformers
    Bouabdallah, S
    Trabelsi, H
    Bouzouita, K
    Sabbah, S
    JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL METHODS, 2002, 54 (1-3): : 391 - 405
  • [40] REVERSED-PHASE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY OF ASTACENE
    NELIS, HJCF
    DELEENHEER, AP
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1988, 452 : 535 - 542