Productivity and water relations of field-grown cashew:: a comparison of sprinkler and drip irrigation

被引:5
|
作者
Blaikie, SJ
Chacko, EK
Lu, P
Müller, WJ
机构
[1] CSIRO Plant Ind, Hort Unit, Darwin Lab, Winnellie, NT 0822, Australia
[2] CSIROMath & Informat Sci, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1071/EA00158
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Cashew is an emerging crop in the seasonally 'wet-dry' tropical regions of northern Australia. In North Queensland flowering and fruiting of cashew coincides with the dry season (May-November). During this period growers sprinkler irrigate at 500 L/tree.week. A 3-year (1996-98) experiment compared this strategy with alternatives, including no irrigation or drip irrigation in which 115 or 230 L/tree.week was applied by drippers placed near the tree trunk and near the canopy drip line throughout the dry season. Measurements of soil water to 1.3 m, leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, tree sap flow and yield were made. Data collected in the first 2 years showed that the water requirement of the trees increased progressively as the crop load and evaporative demand increased during the dry season. During the final year of the study, additional sprinkler and drip treatments, in which water applications were progressively increased during the dry season, were introduced. The productivity of cashew in this experiment was strongly influenced by irrigation treatments, ranging (over all years) from 42 to 160 g nut/m(2) canopy surface area. Depletion of plant-available water in the root zone was associated with a reduction in photosynthesis mediated by partial stomatal closure. These effects of soil drying were evident in all irrigated treatments during the mid and late stages of the dry season but were more severe in treatments receiving the least water. When irrigation was withheld until the mid-stage of the dry season the trees had similar yields to those that were irrigated throughout, emphasising the importance of providing adequate irrigation between nut set and harvest. When rainfall from January to September in each year of the study was taken into account, there was a strong linear relationship between nut yield and water applied (rainfall + irrigation), with each extra kilolitre of water applied resulting in about 6 extra g nut/m(2) canopy surface area. This linear relationship was based on water application in the range 25-50 kL per season. It is possible that if the seasonal water application had exceeded 50 kL the marginal response to extra water may have diminished. Using drippers was slightly more efficient than sprinklers, with drip-irrigated trees requiring about 5% less water applied to achieve a given nut yield. In years when rainfall is average, and subject to other economic factors, growers in North Queensland should aim to irrigate about 500 L/tree.week. In years of low rainfall between January and September it is likely that yield will be improved by applying more irrigation water; high rainfall during these months of the year may reduce the irrigation requirement. In all cases growers should be careful to accurately monitor water applications, particularly when the total (from rainfall + irrigation) exceeds 40 kL/tree for the season.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 673
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Water and energy productivity in sprinkler irrigation systems under using groundwater
    Ebrahimian, Hamed
    Gholami, Zeynab
    Noory, Hamideh
    REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE AGRONOMIA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA, 2017, 34 (04): : 542 - 565
  • [42] Sprinkler irrigation uniformity and crop water productivity of barley in arid region
    Abd El-Wahed, Mohamed
    EL Sabagh, Ayman
    Saneoka, Hirofoumi
    Abdelkhalek, Abdel Aziz
    Barutcular, Celaleddin
    EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2015, 27 (10): : 770 - 775
  • [43] Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: Yield and water productivity
    Ahmadi, Seyed Hamid
    Andersen, Mathias N.
    Plauborg, Finn
    Poulsen, Rolf T.
    Jensen, Christian R.
    Sepaskhah, Ali Reza
    Hansen, Soren
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (11) : 1923 - 1930
  • [44] Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System for Water Productivity and Yield of Rice
    Parthasarathi, Theivasigamani
    Vanitha, Koothan
    Mohandass, Sendass
    Vered, Eli
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2018, 110 (06) : 2378 - 2389
  • [45] Water productivity using furrow and drip irrigation in hybrid maize
    Solano, Jose Lauro Conde
    Herrera, Sara Enid Castillo
    Intriago, Leonor Margarita Rivera
    Palomeque, Paola Alicia Galvez
    REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE AGRONOMIA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA, 2023, 40 (03):
  • [46] LEAF WATER POTENTIAL, STOMATAL-RESISTANCE, AND TEMPERATURE RELATIONS IN FIELD-GROWN SOYBEANS
    JUNG, PK
    SCOTT, HD
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1980, 72 (06) : 986 - 990
  • [47] ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF SUBSURFACE DRIP AND CENTER PIVOT SPRINKLER IRRIGATION USING SPREADSHEET SOFTWARE
    Lamm, F. R.
    O'Brien, D. M.
    Rogers, D. H.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2015, 31 (06) : 929 - 936
  • [48] Pulse drip irrigation and fertigation water depths in the water relations of coriander
    Zamora, Valentin Ruben O.
    da Silva, Manasses M.
    da Silva, Geronimo F.
    Santos Junior, Jose Amilton
    Menezes, Dimas
    de Menezes, Sirleide Maria
    HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2019, 37 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [49] Sustained and regulated deficit irrigation of field-grown Merlot grapevines
    Munitz, S.
    Netzer, Y.
    Schwartz, A.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [50] Capture of Sprinkler Irrigation Water by Container-grown Ornamental Plants
    Million, Jeff B.
    Yeager, Thomas H.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2015, 50 (03) : 442 - 446