Mild stimulation for in vitro fertilization

被引:56
|
作者
Nargund, Geeta [1 ]
Datta, Adrija Kumar [1 ]
Fauser, Bart C. J. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Create Fertil, 150 Cheapside, London EC2 V6ET, England
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Reprod Med & Gynecol, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Conventional stimulation; in vitro fertilization; mild stimulation; minimal stimulation; CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION; GNRH AGONIST TRIGGER; NATURAL CYCLE IVF; VS. LONG PROTOCOL; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; CLOMIPHENE CITRATE; LIVE BIRTH; TREATMENT STRATEGY; HORMONE; ANTAGONIST;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.08.022
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
It has been proven that the use of high gonadotropin dose does not necessarily improve the final outcome of IVF. Mild ovarian stimulation is based on the principle of optimal utilization of competent oocytes/embryos and endometrial receptivity. There is growing evidence that the pregnancy or live birth rates with mild-stimulation protocols are comparable to those with conventional IVF; the cumulative pregnancy outcome has been shown to be no different, despite having fewer numbers of oocytes or embryos available with milder ovarian stimulation. Although equally effective, mild-stimulation IVF is associated with a greater safety profile, in terms of the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and venous thromboembolism. It is also found to be better tolerated by patients and less expensive. Emerging research evidence may lead to widespread acceptance of mild IVF, by both patients and IVF providers, and make IVF more accessible to women and couples worldwide. (C) 2017 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 567
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] POLYNUCLEAR FERTILIZATION IN VARIOUS STIMULATION PROTOCOLS IN IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION
    SENGOKU, K
    ISHIKAWA, M
    TAMATE, K
    SHIMIZU, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY AND MENOPAUSAL STUDIES, 1994, 39 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [22] Poor Ovarian Response to Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization
    Spremovic-Radjenovic, Svetlana
    Bila, Jovan
    Gudovic, Aleksandra
    Vidakovic, Snezana
    Dokic, Milan
    Radunovic, Nebojsa
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2015, 143 (5-6) : 354 - 361
  • [23] Controlled ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization
    Howie, Ruth
    Kay, Vanessa
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 79 (04) : 194 - 199
  • [24] Minimal Stimulation In Vitro Fertilization: A Better Outcome
    Kumar, Adrija
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2016, 10 (02) : 264 - 266
  • [25] Ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in patients with endometriosis
    Zikopoulos, K
    Kolibianakis, EM
    Devroey, P
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (07) : 651 - 655
  • [26] BIRTHWEIGHT OUTCOMES FOR MINIMUM STIMULATION IN VITRO FERTILIZATION (MIVF) VERSUS CONVENTIONAL IN VITRO FERTILIZATION (IVF).
    Murphy, L. A.
    Resetkova, N.
    Humm, K. C.
    Maas, K.
    Penzias, A. S.
    Sakkas, D.
    Lannon, B.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (03) : E29 - E29
  • [27] Comparison of modified agonist, mild-stimulation and antagonist protocols for in vitro fertilization in patients with diminished ovarian reserve
    Yu, Rong
    Jin, Hao
    Huang, Xuefeng
    Lin, Jinju
    Wang, Peiyu
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (06) : 2327 - 2337
  • [28] Mild vs. Conventional stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a stratified meta-analysis according to the level of ovarian response
    Montoya, P.
    Gonzalez-Foruria, I.
    Rodriguez, I.
    Coroleu, B.
    Barri, P. N.
    Polyzos, N. P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 104 - 105
  • [29] Melanoma risk after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization
    Spaan, M.
    van den Belt-Dusebout, A. W.
    Schaapveld, M.
    Mooij, T. M.
    Burger, C. W.
    van Leeuwen, F. E.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 (05) : 1216 - 1228
  • [30] In vitro fertilization stimulation protocol for normal responder patients
    Marci, R.
    Caserta, D.
    Lisi, F.
    Graziano, A.
    Soave, I.
    Lo Monte, G.
    Patella, A.
    Moscarini, M.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 29 (02) : 109 - 112