Mild vs. Conventional stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a stratified meta-analysis according to the level of ovarian response

被引：0
|
作者：
Montoya, P. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Foruria, I. [2 ]
Rodriguez, I. [2 ]
Coroleu, B. [2 ]
Barri, P. N. [2 ]
Polyzos, N. P. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Conceptum Reprod Med & Infertil, Bogota, Colombia
[2] Dexeus Univ Hosp, Reprod Med Dept, Barcelona, Spain
来源：
HUMAN REPRODUCTION | 2019年 / 34卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
O-236
引用
收藏
页码：104 / 105
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mild Ovarian Stimulation for in vitro Fertilization: Are We Ready to Change? A Meta-Analysis
    Matsaseng, Thabo
    Kruger, Thinus
    Steyn, Wilhelm
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2013, 76 (04) : 233 - 240
  • [2] Dual trigger vs. Conventional trigger outcomes in In Vitro Fertilization. Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gonzalez, Virginia Gonzalez
    Triana, Alejandra Mayoral
    Garcia, Irene Serrano
    Nieto, Sara Osado
    Urrutia, Marta Calvo
    Garcia, Ignacio Cristobal
    Gastanaga-Holguera, Teresa
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2023, 27 (01): : 112 - 119
  • [3] Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation with in vitro maturation vs. conventional controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment
    Marchante, Maria
    Barrachina, Ferran
    Piechota, Sabrina
    Fernandez-Gonzalez, Marta
    Giovannini, Alexa
    Smith, Trozalla
    Kats, Simone
    Paulsen, Bruna
    Gonzalez, Eva
    Calvente, Virginia
    Silvan, Ana
    Abittan, Baruch
    Klein, Joshua
    Klatsky, Peter
    Ordonez, Daniel
    Kramme, Christian C.
    F&S SCIENCE, 2024, 5 (03): : 242 - 251
  • [4] Recombinant FSH vs. urinary FSH for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization
    Meden-Vrtovec, H
    Mocnik-Roznik, S
    Tomazevic, T
    Virant-Klun, I
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 48 (10) : 799 - 803
  • [5] Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis
    Fan, Minghui
    Ma, Lin
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (02) : 322 - U130
  • [6] Individualized vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial Response
    Longobardi, Salvatore
    D'Hooghe, Thomas M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2024, 121 (04) : 706 - 706
  • [7] Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Datta, Adrija Kumar
    Maheshwari, Abha
    Felix, Nirmal
    Campbell, Stuart
    Nargund, Geeta
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2020, 41 (02) : 225 - 238
  • [8] Corifollitropin alfa compared to daily FSH in controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis
    Stefania Fensore
    Marco Di Marzio
    Gian Mario Tiboni
    Journal of Ovarian Research, 8
  • [9] Corifollitropin alfa compared to daily FSH in controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis
    Fensore, Stefania
    Di Marzio, Marco
    Tiboni, Gian Mario
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2015, 8
  • [10] Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles
    Chen, Hong
    Wang, Yun
    Lyu, Qifeng
    Ai, Ai
    Fu, Yonglun
    Tian, Hui
    Cai, Renfei
    Hong, Qingqing
    Chen, Qiuju
    Shoham, Zeev
    Kuang, Yanping
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (05) : 1194 - +
12345