Evaluation of set-up errors and determination of set-up margin in pelvic radiotherapy by electronic portal imaging device (EPID)

被引:5
|
作者
Noghreiyan, Vajiheh Vejdani [1 ,2 ]
Nasseri, Shahrookh [3 ]
Anvari, Kazem [4 ]
Naji, Maryam [5 ]
Momennezhad, Mehdi [3 ]
机构
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Dept Med Phys, Fac Med, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[3] Imam Reza Ctr Med Educ & Treatment, Med Phys Dept, Fac Med, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[4] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Solid Tumour Treatment Res Ctr, Omid Hosp, Fac Med, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[5] Imam Reza Hosp, Radiotherapy Dept, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
关键词
3DCRT; CTV to PTV margin; EPID; pelvic cancer; set-up errors; ADAPTIVE RADIATION-THERAPY; PLANNING TARGET VOLUME; HEAD; IMMOBILIZATION; UNCERTAINTIES; ACCURACY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396919000566
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction and purpose: The error in set-up of patients is an inherent part of treatment processes. The positioning errors can be used to determine the margins of the planning target volume (PTV) to cover the target volume, while minimising the radiation dose delivered to normal tissues. This study aimed to evaluate random and systematic errors occurring in inter-fraction set-ups of pelvic radiotherapy measured by electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and then to propose the optimum clinical target volume (CTV) to PTV margin in pelvic cancer patients. Materials and methods: This study examined 22 patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy. A total of 182 portal images were evaluated. Population random (sigma) and systematic (sigma) errors were determined based on the portal images in three directions (X, Y and Z). The set-up margin for CTV to PTV was calculated by published margin formulae of International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements (ICRU) report No. 62 recommendation and formulas presented by Stroom and Heijmen and Van Herk et al. Results: Systematic set-up errors for radiotherapy to patients ranged between 2 center dot 36 and 4 center dot 99 mm, and random errors ranged between 1 center dot 51 and 2 center dot 74 mm. The margin required to cover the target volume retrospectively was calculated based on ICRU 62 and formulas presented by Stroom and Heijmen and Van Herk et al. were used to calculate the range 2 center dot 8-5 center dot 7 mm, 5 center dot 7-11 center dot 9 mm and 6 center dot 9-14 center dot 4 mm, respectively. Conclusion: According to our findings, it can be concluded that by extending the CTV margin by 6 center dot 9-14 center dot 4 mm, we can ensure that 90% of the pelvic cancer patients will receive >= 95% of the prescribed dose in the CTV area.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 156
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of set-up errors and estimation of set-up margin during external beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer using electronic portal imaging device (EPID)
    Khoramian, Daryoush
    Sistani, Soroush
    Farhood, Bagher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (04) : 493 - 500
  • [2] Evaluation of patient set-up variation in isocentric breast radiotherapy using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)
    Petillion, S.
    Swinnen, A.
    Van den Heuvel, F.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S205 - S205
  • [3] Evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging
    Strbac, Bojan
    Jokic, Vesna Spasic
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 29 (05): : 531 - 536
  • [4] Evaluation of set-up errors using electronic portal imaging in head and neck carcinoma
    Bayman, E.
    Uruk Ataman, O.
    Akman, F.
    Kynay, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 : S35 - S35
  • [5] Evaluation of set-up errors using electronic portal imaging in head and neck carcinoma
    Ataman, Oe.
    Demirtas Bayman, E.
    Akman, F.
    Kinay, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S306 - S306
  • [6] Set-up errors in radiotherapy for oesophageal cancers - Is electronic portal imaging or conebeam more accurate?
    Hawkins, Maria A.
    Aitken, Alexandra
    Hansen, Vibeke N.
    McNair, Helen A.
    Tait, Diana M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (02) : 249 - 254
  • [7] Adaptive set-up correction (ASC) to account for set-up errors in prostate radiotherapy
    Lauve, A
    Siebers, J
    Crimaldi, A
    Hagan, M
    Keall, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S332 - S332
  • [8] Prospective study on set-up random errors in 3D-conformal prostate cancer radiotherapy by using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)
    Zerini, D
    Antognoni, P
    Gandini, S
    Monti, L
    Visconti, M
    Orecchia, R
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S288 - S288
  • [9] Assessment of three-dimensional set-up errors in conventional head and neck radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging device
    Gupta, Tejpal
    Chopra, Supriya
    Kadam, Avinash
    Agarwal, Jai Prakash
    Devi, P. Reena
    Ghosh-Laskar, Sarbani
    Dinshaw, Ketayun Ardeshir
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2 (1)
  • [10] Assessment of three-dimensional set-up errors in conventional head and neck radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging device
    Tejpal Gupta
    Supriya Chopra
    Avinash Kadam
    Jai Prakash Agarwal
    P Reena Devi
    Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar
    Ketayun Ardeshir Dinshaw
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 2