Assessment of the capability of CMIP6 global climate models to simulate Arctic cyclones

被引:7
|
作者
Song Jia-Ning [1 ,2 ]
Fu Gang [1 ]
Xu Ying [2 ]
Han Zhen-Yu [2 ]
Sun Qi-Zhen [3 ]
Wang Hui [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[2] China Meteorol Adm, Lab Climate Studies, Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Marine Environm Forecasting Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CMIP6; Arctic cyclones; Simulation capability assessment; NORTHERN-HEMISPHERE WINTER; STORM TRACKS; EXTRATROPICAL CYCLONES; OBJECTIVE IDENTIFICATION; SYNOPTIC ACTIVITY; PROJECTED CHANGES; FRONTAL ZONE; REANALYSIS; VARIABILITY; ERA-40;
D O I
10.1016/j.accre.2021.07.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Arctic cyclones are one of the important synoptic-scale systems that affect weather variability over the Arctic and can cause intense weather phenomena and disasters. Thus, research on the assessment of the climate characteristics, activity laws, and variability trends of Arctic cyclones using climate models has practical significance. On the basis of the fifth-generation European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis (ERAS) data, the spatiotemporal variations of Arctic cyclones during 1981-2014 are analyzed by detecting and tracking cyclones using the Lagrangian method. Then, the simulation results of 14 global climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP5) are compared with the results of ERAS. Both the individual models and their ensemble mean can simulate the spatial distribution of the density of cyclone tracks with reasonable capability, the correlation coefficients of track density are approximately 0.6. Furthermore, in boreal winter, the Atlantic zonal negative bias of track density is stronger than that in summer. By contrast, in boreal summer, the negative bias over the Arctic Ocean region is stronger than that in winter. Moreover, the simulations of density -field-related variables (i.e., cyclolysis, cyclogenesis, track, and lowest center pressure densities) of Arctic cyclones are generally better in winter than in summer, and the models can simulate well that the number of external Arctic cyclones entering the Arctic region from the midlatitudes is more than the internal Arctic cyclones generated inside the Arctic region (60 degrees-90 degrees N). Furthermore, we show that the capability of models to capture Arctic cyclones with a short lifespan (<3 d) is somewhat poor. Except for the simulation of the minimum pressure of Arctic cyclones, the performance of high-resolution models is better than that of low-resolution models. The simulation of Arctic cyclone radius is poor among all of the variables related to Arctic cyclones, and the observed trends of intensities are not well simulated. In general, the simulation of location-field-related variables (i.e., intensity, radius, deepening rate, and center pressure) of Arctic cyclones is better in winter than in summer.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 676
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do CMIP6 Climate Models Simulate Global or Regional Compound Events Skillfully?
    Ridder, Nina N.
    Pitman, Andrew J.
    Ukkola, Anna M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (02)
  • [2] Assessment of Arctic sea ice and surface climate conditions in nine CMIP6 climate models
    Henke, Martin
    Cassalho, Felicio
    Miesse, Tyler
    Ferreira, Celso M.
    Zhang, Jinlun
    Ravens, Thomas M.
    [J]. ARCTIC ANTARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH, 2023, 55 (01)
  • [3] Comparing the Arctic climate in Chinese and other CMIP6 models
    Ruilian He
    Mingkeng Duan
    [J]. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2023, 16 (06) : 10 - 17
  • [4] Arctic Ocean Amplification in a warming climate in CMIP6 models
    Shu, Qi
    Wang, Qiang
    Arthun, Marius
    Wang, Shizhu
    Song, Zhenya
    Zhang, Min
    Qiao, Fangli
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (30)
  • [5] Comparing the Arctic climate in Chinese and other CMIP6 models
    He, Ruilian
    Duan, Mingkeng
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2023, 16 (06)
  • [6] Assessment of CMIP6 global climate models in reconstructing rainfall climatology of Bangladesh
    Kamruzzaman, Mohammad
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Roy, Dilip Kumar
    Islam, Abu Reza Md Towfiqul
    Hwang, Syewoon
    Cho, Jaepil
    Zaman, Md Asad Uz
    Sultana, Tasnim
    Rashid, Towhida
    Akter, Fatima
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (07) : 3928 - 3953
  • [7] Evaluation of the Ability of CMIP6 Global Climate Models to Simulate Precipitation in the Yellow River Basin, China
    Wang, Lin
    Zhang, Jianyun
    Shu, Zhangkang
    Wang, Yan
    Bao, Zhenxin
    Liu, Cuishan
    Zhou, Xiong
    Wang, Guoqing
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [8] The global energy balance as represented in CMIP6 climate models
    Martin Wild
    [J]. Climate Dynamics, 2020, 55 : 553 - 577
  • [9] Global climate response to idealized deforestation in CMIP6 models
    Boysen, Lena R.
    Brovkin, Victor
    Pongratz, Julia
    Lawrence, David M.
    Lawrence, Peter
    Vuichard, Nicolas
    Peylin, Philippe
    Liddicoat, Spencer
    Hajima, Tomohiro
    Zhang, Yanwu
    Rocher, Matthias
    Delire, Christine
    Seferian, Roland
    Arora, Vivek K.
    Nieradzik, Lars
    Anthoni, Peter
    Thiery, Wim
    Lague, Marysa M.
    Lawrence, Deborah
    Lo, Min-Hui
    [J]. BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2020, 17 (22) : 5615 - 5638
  • [10] The global energy balance as represented in CMIP6 climate models
    Wild, Martin
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2020, 55 (3-4) : 553 - 577