No difference between supine and prone position for ERCP in conscious sedated patients: a prospective randomized study

被引:38
|
作者
Tringali, A. [1 ]
Mutignani, M. [1 ]
Milano, A. [2 ]
Perri, V. [1 ]
Costarnagna, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, A Gemelli Univ Hosp, Digest Endoscopy Unit, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Gastroenterol Unit, Dept Internal Med & Aging Sci, Chieti, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-995317
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is usually performed with the patient prone or in the left lateral position. The supine position could be more comfortable and may facilitate airway management. On the other hand, technical difficulties and a greater risk of adverse cardiorespiratory events have been shown when ERCP is performed in a supine patient. Our aim was to assess, in a tertiary referral center, the differences between performing ERCP with the patient supine or prone, in terms of technical features and complications both during and after the procedure. Patients and methods: Between December 2005 and May 2006,120 patients (66 female, mean age 62 years) who had an intact papilla and were candidates for therapeutic ERCP were prospectively randomized to undergo ERCP under conscious sedation with midazolam, in the prone (n = 60) or supine (n = 60) position, by an expert endoscopist (tutor) or a trainee. The following parameters were recorded: difficulty of cannulation and difficulty of ECRP procedure, time needed to visualize the papilla, time needed to achieve opacification and cannulation, exam duration, episodes of tachy/bradycardia and desaturation, episodes of duodenoscope displacement into the stomach, and complications. Results: Ninety-eight patients underwent ERCP for benign disease and 22 for malignant biliary strictures. The ERCP success rate was 98.3% in the tutor group and 43.3% in the trainee group. No significant differences were found between the two groups of operators (tutors and trainees) in the recorded parameters and complication rates encountered in prone versus supine patients. Conclusion: Our results show that ERCP success rates and complications (intraoperative and postoperative) are similar whether ERCP is performed with the patient prone or supine, even when operators are of differing skill levels. Training, technique, and a proper learning phase are recommended in order to perform ERCP with no differences whether the patient is prone or supine.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 97
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine and prone position: a comparative complication study
    Subekti, E.
    Danarto, R.
    Indrawarman, I.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 20 - 20
  • [42] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Oblique Supine Lithotomy Position and Prone Position: A Comparative Study
    Al-Dessoukey, Ahmad Aref
    Moussa, Ayman Salah
    Abdelbary, Ahmed Mahmoud
    Zayed, Ahmed
    Abdallah, Rabie
    Elderwy, Ahmad A.
    Massoud, Amr Medhat
    Aly, Aly Hussein
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (09) : 1058 - 1063
  • [43] ANI and BIS variations in supine and prone position during closed-tracheal suction in sedated and myorelaxed ICU patients with severe COVID-19: A retrospective study
    Boselli, E.
    Fatah, A.
    Ledochowski, S.
    Allaouchiche, B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2021, 35 (06) : 1403 - 1409
  • [44] Comparison of outcomes for supine vs. prone position ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mashiana, Harmeet Singh
    Jayaraj, Mahendran
    Mohan, Babu Pappu
    Ohning, Gordon
    Adler, Douglas G.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (11) : E1296 - E1301
  • [45] ANI and BIS variations in supine and prone position during closed-tracheal suction in sedated and myorelaxed ICU patients with severe COVID-19: A retrospective study
    E. Boselli
    A. Fatah
    S. Ledochowski
    B. Allaouchiche
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2021, 35 : 1403 - 1409
  • [46] Variability of Whole Breast Target Volume Delineation Between Prone and Supine Position: A Multicentric Study
    Lakosi, F.
    Janvary, L.
    Vanderick, J.
    Lombard, N.
    Meyns, M.
    Seidel, L.
    Vavassis, P.
    Untereiner, M.
    Coucke, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S252 - S252
  • [47] Prospective comparison of the optimal radiation technique with mamma carcinoma:: supine position vs. prone position
    Petersen, C.
    Wuerschmidt, F.
    Dahle, J.
    Bastian, C.
    Kretschmer, M.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2008, 184 : 135 - 135
  • [48] Does ERCP position matter? A randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy and complications of left lateral versus prone position (POSITION study)
    Varma, Poornima
    Ket, Shara
    Paul, Eldho
    Barnes, Malcolm
    Devonshire, David A.
    Croagh, Daniel
    Swan, Michael P.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (04) : E403 - E412
  • [49] Enteral feeding in the critically ill: comparison between the supine and prone positions: a prospective crossover study in mechanically ventilated patients
    Peter HJ van der Voort
    Durk F Zandstra
    Critical Care, 5
  • [50] Enteral feeding in the critically ill: comparison between the supine and prone positions - A prospective crossover study in mechanically ventilated patients
    van der Voort, PHJ
    Zandstra, DF
    CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 5 (04): : 216 - 220