No difference between supine and prone position for ERCP in conscious sedated patients: a prospective randomized study

被引:38
|
作者
Tringali, A. [1 ]
Mutignani, M. [1 ]
Milano, A. [2 ]
Perri, V. [1 ]
Costarnagna, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, A Gemelli Univ Hosp, Digest Endoscopy Unit, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Gastroenterol Unit, Dept Internal Med & Aging Sci, Chieti, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-995317
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is usually performed with the patient prone or in the left lateral position. The supine position could be more comfortable and may facilitate airway management. On the other hand, technical difficulties and a greater risk of adverse cardiorespiratory events have been shown when ERCP is performed in a supine patient. Our aim was to assess, in a tertiary referral center, the differences between performing ERCP with the patient supine or prone, in terms of technical features and complications both during and after the procedure. Patients and methods: Between December 2005 and May 2006,120 patients (66 female, mean age 62 years) who had an intact papilla and were candidates for therapeutic ERCP were prospectively randomized to undergo ERCP under conscious sedation with midazolam, in the prone (n = 60) or supine (n = 60) position, by an expert endoscopist (tutor) or a trainee. The following parameters were recorded: difficulty of cannulation and difficulty of ECRP procedure, time needed to visualize the papilla, time needed to achieve opacification and cannulation, exam duration, episodes of tachy/bradycardia and desaturation, episodes of duodenoscope displacement into the stomach, and complications. Results: Ninety-eight patients underwent ERCP for benign disease and 22 for malignant biliary strictures. The ERCP success rate was 98.3% in the tutor group and 43.3% in the trainee group. No significant differences were found between the two groups of operators (tutors and trainees) in the recorded parameters and complication rates encountered in prone versus supine patients. Conclusion: Our results show that ERCP success rates and complications (intraoperative and postoperative) are similar whether ERCP is performed with the patient prone or supine, even when operators are of differing skill levels. Training, technique, and a proper learning phase are recommended in order to perform ERCP with no differences whether the patient is prone or supine.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 97
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PCNL in the prone position VS PCNL in the modified supine Double-S position: is there a better position? A prospective randomized trial
    Giusti, Giuseppe
    De Lisa, Antonello
    UROLITHIASIS, 2020, 48 (01) : 63 - 69
  • [22] Randomized multicenter trial in ards:: Supine vs prone position
    Mancebo, J
    Rialp, G
    Fernandez, R
    Gordo, F
    Blanch, L
    Rodriguez, F
    Garro, P
    Ricart, P
    Vallverdu, I
    Ferrer, M
    Castaño, J
    Saura, P
    Bonet, A
    Albert, R
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 : S64 - S64
  • [23] PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY IN OBESE PATIENTS: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PRONE AND TOTAL SUPINE POSITION
    Mazzucchi, Eduardo
    Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho
    Marchini, Giovanni Scalla
    Danilovic, Alexandre
    Brito, Artur Henrique
    Srougi, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A176 - A176
  • [24] KIDNEY POSITION VARIABILITY BETWEEN PRONE AND SUPINE ATTITUDES
    LAROSE, JH
    IZENSTARK, JL
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1970, 63 (02) : 171 - +
  • [25] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Obese Patients: Comparison Between the Prone and Total Supine Position
    Mazzucchi, Eduardo
    Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho
    Marchini, Giovanni Scala
    Danilovic, Alexandre
    Brito, Artur Henrique
    Srougi, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (11) : 1437 - 1442
  • [26] Prone position as prevention of lung injury in comatose patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Pascal Beuret
    Marie-Jose Carton
    Karim Nourdine
    Mahmoud Kaaki
    Gerard Tramoni
    Jean-Claude Ducreux
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2002, 28 : 564 - 569
  • [27] A comparison between supine PCNL in the 'Barts Flank-free Modified Position' versus prone position - a prospective study in a single centre
    Arunaslaam, A. P.
    Daneshwar, D.
    Wei, K. T.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 : 7 - 8
  • [28] Prospective Randomized Study to Compare the Outcomes of EUS in 100 Patients in the Supine or Left Lateral Position
    Grubel, Peter
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 : S500 - S501
  • [29] Prone position as prevention of lung injury in comatose patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Beuret, P
    Carton, MJ
    Nourdine, K
    Kaaki, M
    Tramoni, G
    Ducreux, JC
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (05) : 564 - 569
  • [30] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine versus Prone Position in Tertiary Hospital in Mysore: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Ramesh, Ravikumar Banavase
    Vijayakumar, R.
    Manjunath, V.
    Gautham, Abhilash
    Gowda, Amruthraj
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (09) : PC13 - PC17