No difference between supine and prone position for ERCP in conscious sedated patients: a prospective randomized study

被引:35
|
作者
Tringali, A. [1 ]
Mutignani, M. [1 ]
Milano, A. [2 ]
Perri, V. [1 ]
Costarnagna, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, A Gemelli Univ Hosp, Digest Endoscopy Unit, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Gastroenterol Unit, Dept Internal Med & Aging Sci, Chieti, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-995317
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is usually performed with the patient prone or in the left lateral position. The supine position could be more comfortable and may facilitate airway management. On the other hand, technical difficulties and a greater risk of adverse cardiorespiratory events have been shown when ERCP is performed in a supine patient. Our aim was to assess, in a tertiary referral center, the differences between performing ERCP with the patient supine or prone, in terms of technical features and complications both during and after the procedure. Patients and methods: Between December 2005 and May 2006,120 patients (66 female, mean age 62 years) who had an intact papilla and were candidates for therapeutic ERCP were prospectively randomized to undergo ERCP under conscious sedation with midazolam, in the prone (n = 60) or supine (n = 60) position, by an expert endoscopist (tutor) or a trainee. The following parameters were recorded: difficulty of cannulation and difficulty of ECRP procedure, time needed to visualize the papilla, time needed to achieve opacification and cannulation, exam duration, episodes of tachy/bradycardia and desaturation, episodes of duodenoscope displacement into the stomach, and complications. Results: Ninety-eight patients underwent ERCP for benign disease and 22 for malignant biliary strictures. The ERCP success rate was 98.3% in the tutor group and 43.3% in the trainee group. No significant differences were found between the two groups of operators (tutors and trainees) in the recorded parameters and complication rates encountered in prone versus supine patients. Conclusion: Our results show that ERCP success rates and complications (intraoperative and postoperative) are similar whether ERCP is performed with the patient prone or supine, even when operators are of differing skill levels. Training, technique, and a proper learning phase are recommended in order to perform ERCP with no differences whether the patient is prone or supine.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 97
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prone or supine position when performing ERCP? Results of a prospective randomized trial
    Tringali, Andrea
    Mutignani, Massimiliano
    Milano, Angel
    Familiari, Pietro
    Iacopini, Federico
    Spada, Cristiano
    Marchese, Michele
    Petruzziello, Lucio
    Costamagna, Guido
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB236 - AB236
  • [2] Should patients undergoing ERCP be placed in the prone or supine position?
    C Mel Wilcox
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2008, 5 : 488 - 489
  • [3] Should patients undergoing ERCP be placed in the prone or supine position?
    Wilcox, C. Mel
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 5 (09): : 488 - 489
  • [4] MODIFIED SUPINE VERSUS PRONE POSITION IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Wang, Yanbo
    Chen, Qihui
    Jiang, Fengming
    Wang, Chunxi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A179 - A179
  • [5] Prone versus Modified Supine Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Prospective Randomized Study
    Wang, Yanbo
    Wang, Yan
    Yao, Yunming
    Xu, Ning
    Zhang, Haifeng
    Chen, Qihui
    Lu, Zhihua
    Hu, Jinghai
    Wang, Xiaoqing
    Lu, Ji
    Hao, Yuanyuan
    Jiang, Fengming
    Hou, Yuchuan
    Wang, Chunxi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 10 (11): : 1518 - 1523
  • [6] Is the supine position as safe and effective as the prone position for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? - A prospective randomized study
    Terruzzi, V
    Radaelli, F
    Meucci, G
    Minoli, G
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 37 (12) : 1211 - 1214
  • [7] What is the best patient's position during ERCP? A prospective randomized trial comparing prone vs. supine position
    Terruzzi, V
    Radaelli, F
    Meucci, G
    Minoli, G
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (05) : AB193 - AB193
  • [8] A prospective, randomized, open-label comparison of safety, efficacy and success rate of ercp on prone and supine position
    Trecero, S. R. P.
    Acuesta, W. C. R.
    Purwanta, R. S.
    Musngi, J. K.
    Ong, E. G.
    Lim, C. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 25 : A53 - A53
  • [9] IMPACT OF SUPINE VERSUS PRONE POSITION ON ERCP PERFORMANCE: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
    Osagiede, Osayande
    Cochuyt, Jordan
    Cruz, Luisa
    Kroner, Paul T.
    Lukens, Frank
    Corral, Juan E.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB341 - AB342
  • [10] FLANK FREE MODIFIED SUPINE VERSUS PRONE POSITION IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Desoky, E. A. E.
    Zaied, A. E. M.
    Youssef, M. K.
    Alayman, A. A.
    Shahin, A. M. S.
    Kamel, H. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 68 - 69