Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis Framework for Ramp Metering Deployments

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Xifan [1 ]
Salem, Ossama [1 ]
Salman, Baris [1 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, 151 Link Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2554-08
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The primary objectives of ramp metering are to reduce congestion on freeways by restricting the total flow entering the freeway and to discourage short-distance travelers from using the freeway. Life-cycle cost analysis of ramp-metering deployments has received attention in particular for identifying the strategy with the lowest cost. However, increasing concerns over the effects of congestion on the environment and increasing rates of accidents are urging decision makers to consider the environmental and social effects of ramp-metering deployments in addition to agency costs. This paper presents a high-level benefit cost analysis framework for ramp-metering deployments. The framework was constructed in consideration of the triple bottom line of sustainability (i.e., economic, environmental, and social factors). More specifically, the framework is made up of four main components: (a) life-cycle cost analysis, (b) analysis of benefits achieved through travel time savings, (c) analysis of benefits achieved through reductions in energy consumption, and (d) analysis of benefits achieved through reductions in the number of accidents. A hypothetical case study is used to demonstrate the application of the framework. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to determine the effects of higher traffic demand on the benefits achieved. It is expected that the proposed framework can improve the high-level decision-making procedures of transportation agencies in regard to the deployment of ramp meters.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Benefit-Cost Analysis of Increased Trade: An Order-of-Magnitude Estimate of the Benefit-Cost Ratio
    Feyrer, James
    Tyazhelnikov, Vladimir
    Aleman-Castilla, Benjamin
    Wong, Brad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2023, 14 : 108 - 135
  • [42] Benefit-Cost Analysis for Financial Regulation
    Posner, Eric
    Weyl, E. Glen
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (03): : 393 - 397
  • [43] Benefit-Cost Analysis and Emerging Technologies
    Mannix, Brian
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2018, 48 : S12 - S20
  • [44] Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Burgess, David F.
    Zerbe, Richard O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2011, 2 (02)
  • [45] REPEAL OF PROHIBITION: A BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    Vitaliano, Donald F.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2015, 33 (01) : 44 - 55
  • [46] DISTRIBUTION AND EFFICIENCY IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    NEENAN, WB
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1971, 4 (02): : 216 - 224
  • [47] The Consent Justification for Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Zerbe, Richard O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2020, 11 (02) : 319 - 340
  • [48] Including Jobs in Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Bartik, Timothy J.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 4, 2012, 4 : 54 - 72
  • [49] An aggregate measure for benefit-cost analysis
    Zerbe, Richard O., Jr.
    Bauman, Yoram
    Finkle, Aaron
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 58 (03) : 449 - 461
  • [50] Benefit-cost analysis in public health
    Lave, LB
    Joshi, SV
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 17 : 203 - 219