Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis Framework for Ramp Metering Deployments

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Xifan [1 ]
Salem, Ossama [1 ]
Salman, Baris [1 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, 151 Link Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2554-08
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The primary objectives of ramp metering are to reduce congestion on freeways by restricting the total flow entering the freeway and to discourage short-distance travelers from using the freeway. Life-cycle cost analysis of ramp-metering deployments has received attention in particular for identifying the strategy with the lowest cost. However, increasing concerns over the effects of congestion on the environment and increasing rates of accidents are urging decision makers to consider the environmental and social effects of ramp-metering deployments in addition to agency costs. This paper presents a high-level benefit cost analysis framework for ramp-metering deployments. The framework was constructed in consideration of the triple bottom line of sustainability (i.e., economic, environmental, and social factors). More specifically, the framework is made up of four main components: (a) life-cycle cost analysis, (b) analysis of benefits achieved through travel time savings, (c) analysis of benefits achieved through reductions in energy consumption, and (d) analysis of benefits achieved through reductions in the number of accidents. A hypothetical case study is used to demonstrate the application of the framework. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to determine the effects of higher traffic demand on the benefits achieved. It is expected that the proposed framework can improve the high-level decision-making procedures of transportation agencies in regard to the deployment of ramp meters.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life-cycle cost analysis of the labor factor
    Dahlen, P
    Bolmsjo, GS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1996, 46 : 459 - 467
  • [32] Life-cycle cost analysis of supplemental damping
    King, SA
    Jain, A
    Hart, GC
    [J]. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS, 2001, 10 (05): : 351 - 360
  • [33] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF FAMILY PLANNING
    BLUMSTEIN, A
    CASSIDY, RG
    [J]. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1973, 7 (02) : 151 - 160
  • [34] Performance Bond Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Myers, Lorena
    Najafi, Fazil T.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2228) : 3 - 10
  • [35] BATTERY LIFE-cYCLE COST ANALYSIS.
    Brown, D.R.
    Humphreys, K.K.
    [J]. Electric Vehicle Developments, 1988, 7 (03): : 81 - 82
  • [36] IMPROVING ACCURACY OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    BORDMAN, SL
    [J]. IEEE SPECTRUM, 1973, 10 (09) : 72 - 76
  • [37] How (Not) to Lie with Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Farrow, Scott
    [J]. ECONOMISTS VOICE, 2013, 10 (01): : 45 - 50
  • [38] Principles and Standards for Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Kumru, Cagri S.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 58 (04) : 622 - 624
  • [39] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS AND TRADE POLICIES
    DASGUPTA, P
    STIGLITZ, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1974, 82 (01) : 1 - 33
  • [40] CONVENTION AND LIMITATION IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    HAMMOND, RJ
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL, 1966, 6 (02) : 195 - 222