Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis Framework for Ramp Metering Deployments

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Xifan [1 ]
Salem, Ossama [1 ]
Salman, Baris [1 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, 151 Link Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2554-08
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The primary objectives of ramp metering are to reduce congestion on freeways by restricting the total flow entering the freeway and to discourage short-distance travelers from using the freeway. Life-cycle cost analysis of ramp-metering deployments has received attention in particular for identifying the strategy with the lowest cost. However, increasing concerns over the effects of congestion on the environment and increasing rates of accidents are urging decision makers to consider the environmental and social effects of ramp-metering deployments in addition to agency costs. This paper presents a high-level benefit cost analysis framework for ramp-metering deployments. The framework was constructed in consideration of the triple bottom line of sustainability (i.e., economic, environmental, and social factors). More specifically, the framework is made up of four main components: (a) life-cycle cost analysis, (b) analysis of benefits achieved through travel time savings, (c) analysis of benefits achieved through reductions in energy consumption, and (d) analysis of benefits achieved through reductions in the number of accidents. A hypothetical case study is used to demonstrate the application of the framework. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to determine the effects of higher traffic demand on the benefits achieved. It is expected that the proposed framework can improve the high-level decision-making procedures of transportation agencies in regard to the deployment of ramp meters.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementing Highway Safety Manual Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Safety Improvements
    Frustaci, Jordan B.
    Saito, Mitsuru
    Schultz, Grant G.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2636) : 23 - 31
  • [2] A life-cycle benefit/cost analysis framework for adaptive traffic control systems
    Chen, Xifan
    Salem, Ossama
    Salman, Baris
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-TRANSPORT, 2022, 175 (04) : 199 - 206
  • [3] Infrastructures and life-cycle cost-benefit analysis
    Thoft-Christensen, Palle
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2012, 8 (05) : 507 - 516
  • [4] Freeboard life-cycle benefit-cost analysis of a rental single-family residence for landlord, tenant, and insurer
    Gnan, Ehab
    Mostafiz, Rubayet Bin
    Rahim, Md Adilur
    Friedland, Carol J.
    Rohli, Robert V.
    Taghinezhad, Arash
    Al Assi, Ayat
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2024, 5
  • [5] Project-Level Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis Approach for Evaluating Highway Segment Safety Hardware Improvements
    Li, Zongzhi
    Labi, Samuel
    Karlaftis, Matthew
    Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos
    Abbas, Montasir
    Zhou, Bei
    Madanu, Sunil
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2160) : 1 - 11
  • [6] Economically optimizing elevation of new, single-family residences for flood mitigation via life-cycle benefit-cost analysis
    Gnan, Ehab
    Friedland, Carol J.
    Mostafiz, Rubayet Bin
    Rahim, Md Adilur
    Gentimis, Thanos
    Taghinezhad, Arash
    Rohli, Robert V.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [7] Integrating life-cycle assessment into transport cost-benefit analysis
    Manzo, Stefano
    Salling, Kim Bang
    [J]. TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 : 273 - 282
  • [8] Benefit-cost analysis
    Kingston, G
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2004, 80 (251) : 468 - 469
  • [9] Benefit-cost analysis
    Dorman, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 11 (02): : 188 - 190
  • [10] Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of extensive vegetated roof systems
    Carter, Timothy
    Keeler, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 87 (03) : 350 - 363