Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in immunocompetent patients with septic shock

被引:1
|
作者
Lu, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Han, Wei [3 ]
Gao, Yan-xia [4 ]
Guo, Shi-gong [5 ]
Yu, Shi-yuan [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Xue-zhong [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Hua-dong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Emergency Dept, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Inst Basic Med Sci, Sch Basic Med,Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100005, Peoples R China
[4] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Emergency Dept, Zhengzhou 450052, Peoples R China
[5] Southmead Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
Corticosteroids; Septic shock; Immunocompetent patients; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; HYDROCORTISONE; SEPSIS; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY; ADULTS; FLUDROCORTISONE; MANAGEMENT; REVERSAL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.02.007
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The use of corticosteroids in septic shock has been studied for many decades but yielded conflicting results. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of corticosteroids in immunocompetent patients with septic shock. METHODS: Medline via PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2020. Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing corticosteroids with a control group for immunocompetent patients with septic shock. Data were abstracted and reported following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Intervention and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The efficacy outcome included mortality and shock reversal. The safety outcomes were infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hyperglycemia. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with a total of 1,298 patients were included. Compared with the control group, corticosteroid group did not lower the short-term (28 or 30 days) mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.06, inconsistency [I-2]=0%, trial sequential analysis [TSA]-adjusted CI 0.83 to 1.09, moderate-certainty evidence). Corticosteroids significantly shortened the time to shock reversal compared with the control group (mean difference [MD] -21.56 hours; 95% CI -32.95 to -10.16, I-2=0%; TSA-adjusted CI -33.33 to -9.78, moderate-certainty evidence). The corticosteroid treatment was associated with an increased risk of hyperglycemia but not the infection or gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The corticosteroid treatment is not associated with lower short- or long-term mortality compared with placebo in immunocompetent patients with septic shock. However, corticosteroids significantly shorten the time to shock reversal without increasing the risk of infection. The patient's immune status should also be considered during clinical treatment and clinical trials in future.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 130
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DOPAMINE VERSUS NOREPINEPHRINE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SEPTIC SHOCK
    Patel, Gourang P.
    Grahe, Jaime Simon
    Sperry, Mathew
    Singla, Sunit
    Elpern, Ellen
    Lateef, Omar
    Balk, Robert A.
    [J]. SHOCK, 2010, 33 (04): : 375 - 380
  • [42] COMPARISON OF VITAMIN C, THIAMINE, AND CORTICOSTEROIDS IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK
    Teachey, Amanda
    Keith, Philip
    Tatum, Evan
    Watkins, Jared
    Hodges, Jeremy
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01) : 735 - 735
  • [43] Clinician preferences for prescription of corticosteroids in patients with septic shock: an international survey
    Hammond, Naomi E.
    Kumar, Ashwani
    Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi
    Arabi, Yaseen M.
    Cohen, Jeremy
    Di Tanna, Gian Luca
    Grattan, Sarah
    Van Heerden, Vernon
    Joynt, Gavin
    Machado, Flavia R.
    Perner, Anders
    Rhodes, Andrew
    Yeh, Tony
    Venkatesh, Balasubramanian
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2021, 23 (02) : 234 - 238
  • [44] Sphingomonas paucimobilis Septic Shock in an Immunocompetent Patient
    Alkhatib, Bailey
    Veytsman, Eric
    Klumpp, Linda
    Hayes, Edwin
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [45] External Corroboration That Corticosteroids May Be Harmful to Septic Shock Endotype A Patients
    Wong, Hector R.
    Hart, Kimberly W.
    Lindsell, Christopher J.
    Sweeney, Timothy E.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : E98 - E101
  • [46] Efficacy and Safety of Neostigmine Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    El-Tamalawy, Mona M.
    Soliman, Moetaza M.
    Omara, Amany F.
    Rashad, Amal
    Ibrahim, Osama M.
    El-Shishtawy, Mamdouh M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [47] THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VASOPRESSORS FOR SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Jia, Lu
    Wang, Pufeng
    Li, Cong
    Xie, Jianfeng
    [J]. SHOCK, 2023, 60 (06): : 746 - 752
  • [48] Potential for overuse of corticosteroids and vasopressin in septic shock
    Hsu, Joe L.
    Liu, Vincent
    Patterson, Andrew J.
    Martin, Greg S.
    Nicolls, Mark R.
    Russell, James A.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (05):
  • [49] Potential for overuse of corticosteroids and vasopressin in septic shock
    Joe L Hsu
    Vincent Liu
    Andrew J Patterson
    Greg S Martin
    Mark R Nicolls
    James A Russell
    [J]. Critical Care, 16
  • [50] Prohormones: novel biomarkers for corticosteroids in septic shock?
    Djillali Annane
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2008, 34 : 395 - 396