THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VASOPRESSORS FOR SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

被引:4
|
作者
Jia, Lu [1 ]
Wang, Pufeng [1 ]
Li, Cong [1 ]
Xie, Jianfeng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Crit Care Med, Zhongda Hosp,Sch Med, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Crit Care Med, Zhongda Hosp,Sch Med, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
SHOCK | 2023年 / 60卷 / 06期
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Septic shock; sepsis; vasopressors; vasoactive drugs; network meta-analysis; CE-catecholamines; DA-dopamine; DB-dobutamine; DX-dopexamine; EP-epinephrine; EX-enoximone; GRADE-Grades of Recommendation; Assessment; Development and Evaluation; ICU-intensive care unit; LE-levosimendan; LOS-length of stay; NE-norepinephrine; OR-odds ratio; PA-placebo; PE-phenylephrine; RCTS-randomized controlled trials; RR-risk ratio; SP-selepressin; SUCRA-surface under the cumulative ranking curve; TP-terlipressin; VP-vasopressin; NOREPINEPHRINE; TERLIPRESSIN; DOBUTAMINE; DOPAMINE; EPINEPHRINE; MANAGEMENT; SEPSIS; INFUSION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000002193
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Septic shock is a distributive shock with decreased systemic vascular resistance and MAP. Septic shock contributes to the most common causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Current guidelines recommend the use of norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor, whereas adrenergic agonists and vasopressin analogs are also commonly used by physicians. To date, very few studies have synthetically compared the effects of multiple types of vasoactive medications. The aim of this study was to systemically evaluate the efficacy of vasoactive agents both individually and in combination to treat septic shock. Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to May 12, 2022, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of different types of vasopressors. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was the ICU length of stay. Adverse events are defined as any undesirable outcomes, including myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia, peripheral ischemia, or stroke and cerebrovascular events. Findings: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials comprising 4,966 patients and assessing 8 types of vasoactive treatments were included in the network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve provided a ranking of vasoactive medications in terms of 28-day all-cause mortality from most effective to least effective: norepinephrine plus dobutamine, epinephrine, vasopressin, terlipressin, norepinephrine, norepinephrine plus vasopressin, dopamine, and dobutamine. Dopamine was associated with a significantly shorter ICU stay than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin, whereas other vasoactive medications showed no definite difference in ICU length of stay. Regarding adverse events, norepinephrine was associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Dopamine was associated with the highest incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. Epinephrine and terlipressin were associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Interpretation: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that norepinephrine plus dobutamine is associated with a lower risk of 28-day mortality in septic shock patients than other vasoactive medications, and the use of dopamine is associated with a higher risk of 28-day mortality due to septic shock than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 752
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vasopressors in septic shock: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhou, Feihu
    Mao, Zhi
    Zeng, Xiantao
    Kang, Hongjun
    Liu, Hui
    Pan, Liang
    Hou, Peter C.
    [J]. THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 11 : 1047 - 1059
  • [2] Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Avni, Tomer
    Lador, Adi
    Lev, Shaul
    Leibovici, Leonard
    Paul, Mical
    Grossman, Alon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [3] The efficacy and safety of plasma exchange in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rimmer, Emily
    Houston, Brett L.
    Kumar, Anand
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Friesen, Carol
    Marshall, John C.
    Rock, Gail
    Turgeon, Alexis F.
    Cook, Deborah J.
    Houston, Donald S.
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (06)
  • [4] The efficacy and safety of plasma exchange in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Emily Rimmer
    Brett L Houston
    Anand Kumar
    Ahmed M Abou-Setta
    Carol Friesen
    John C Marshall
    Gail Rock
    Alexis F Turgeon
    Deborah J Cook
    Donald S Houston
    Ryan Zarychanski
    [J]. Critical Care, 18
  • [5] Safety and Efficacy of Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sligl, Wendy I.
    Milner, Danny A., Jr.
    Sundar, Sugantha
    Mphatswe, Wendy
    Majumdar, Sumit R.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 49 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [6] Evaluation of efficacy and safety of esmolol in treating patients with septic shock A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hou, Bin
    Cai, Ke
    Li, Yue
    Hu, Chunfang
    Pu, Xuehua
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (13) : E29124
  • [7] Clinical efficacy and safety of vitamin C in the treatment of septic shock patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cai, Bingbing
    Lv, Xue
    Lin, Ming
    Feng, Changfu
    Chen, Changneng
    [J]. ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (04) : 1369 - 1380
  • [8] The Efficacy and Safety Of Therapeutic Aheresis In Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rimmer, Emily K.
    Houston, Brett L.
    Kumar, Anand
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed
    Friesen, Carol
    Turgeon, Alexis F.
    Cook, Deborah J.
    Houston, Donald S.
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    [J]. BLOOD, 2013, 122 (21)
  • [9] Is norepinephrine more effective than other vasopressors for septic shock? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    F Zhou
    Z Peng
    W Zhang
    J Bishop
    Q Song
    [J]. Critical Care, 17 (Suppl 2):
  • [10] Corticosteroids in septic shock: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ben Gibbison
    José A. López-López
    Julian P. T. Higgins
    Tom Miller
    Gianni D. Angelini
    Stafford L. Lightman
    Djillali Annane
    [J]. Critical Care, 21