THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VASOPRESSORS FOR SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

被引:4
|
作者
Jia, Lu [1 ]
Wang, Pufeng [1 ]
Li, Cong [1 ]
Xie, Jianfeng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Crit Care Med, Zhongda Hosp,Sch Med, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Crit Care Med, Zhongda Hosp,Sch Med, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
SHOCK | 2023年 / 60卷 / 06期
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Septic shock; sepsis; vasopressors; vasoactive drugs; network meta-analysis; CE-catecholamines; DA-dopamine; DB-dobutamine; DX-dopexamine; EP-epinephrine; EX-enoximone; GRADE-Grades of Recommendation; Assessment; Development and Evaluation; ICU-intensive care unit; LE-levosimendan; LOS-length of stay; NE-norepinephrine; OR-odds ratio; PA-placebo; PE-phenylephrine; RCTS-randomized controlled trials; RR-risk ratio; SP-selepressin; SUCRA-surface under the cumulative ranking curve; TP-terlipressin; VP-vasopressin; NOREPINEPHRINE; TERLIPRESSIN; DOBUTAMINE; DOPAMINE; EPINEPHRINE; MANAGEMENT; SEPSIS; INFUSION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000002193
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Septic shock is a distributive shock with decreased systemic vascular resistance and MAP. Septic shock contributes to the most common causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Current guidelines recommend the use of norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor, whereas adrenergic agonists and vasopressin analogs are also commonly used by physicians. To date, very few studies have synthetically compared the effects of multiple types of vasoactive medications. The aim of this study was to systemically evaluate the efficacy of vasoactive agents both individually and in combination to treat septic shock. Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to May 12, 2022, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of different types of vasopressors. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was the ICU length of stay. Adverse events are defined as any undesirable outcomes, including myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia, peripheral ischemia, or stroke and cerebrovascular events. Findings: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials comprising 4,966 patients and assessing 8 types of vasoactive treatments were included in the network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve provided a ranking of vasoactive medications in terms of 28-day all-cause mortality from most effective to least effective: norepinephrine plus dobutamine, epinephrine, vasopressin, terlipressin, norepinephrine, norepinephrine plus vasopressin, dopamine, and dobutamine. Dopamine was associated with a significantly shorter ICU stay than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin, whereas other vasoactive medications showed no definite difference in ICU length of stay. Regarding adverse events, norepinephrine was associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Dopamine was associated with the highest incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. Epinephrine and terlipressin were associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Interpretation: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that norepinephrine plus dobutamine is associated with a lower risk of 28-day mortality in septic shock patients than other vasoactive medications, and the use of dopamine is associated with a higher risk of 28-day mortality due to septic shock than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 752
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combination era, using combined vasopressors showed benefits in treating septic shock patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Chongxiang
    Pang, Lanlan
    Wang, Yanyan
    Wen, Tianmeng
    Yu, Wu
    Yue, Xiaolei
    Rong, Yuming
    Liao, Wei
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (20)
  • [22] Comparative efficacy of vasoactive medications in patients with septic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lu Cheng
    Jing Yan
    Shutang Han
    Qiuhua Chen
    Mingqi Chen
    Hua Jiang
    Jun Lu
    [J]. Critical Care, 23
  • [23] Comparative efficacy of vasoactive medications in patients with septic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cheng, Lu
    Yan, Jing
    Han, Shutang
    Chen, Qiuhua
    Chen, Mingqi
    Jiang, Hua
    Lu, Jun
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 23 (1)
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ji, Lanlan
    Xie, Wenhui
    Zhang, Zhuoli
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2020, 50 (05) : 1073 - 1080
  • [25] The Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological Treatments for Restless Legs Syndrome: Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Xuan
    Du, Juncong
    Liang, Yi
    Dai, Chengcheng
    Zhao, Lili
    Liu, Xi
    Tan, Changhong
    Mo, Lijuan
    Chen, Lifen
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [26] Safety and Efficacy of Anifrolumab for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Network Meta-analysis
    Fatima, Rawish
    Khader, Yasmin
    Lee-Smith, Wade
    Garg, Anu
    Altorok, Nezam
    Aziz, Muhammad
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 30 (05) : E487 - E490
  • [27] Efficacy of systemic treatment in prostate cancer patients with visceral metastasis: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis
    Yanagiswawa, T.
    Rajwa, P.
    Kawada, T.
    Mori, K.
    Quhal, F.
    Laukhtina, E.
    Von Deimling, M.
    Bianchi, A.
    Majdoub, M.
    Pradere, B.
    Kramer, G.
    Kimura, T.
    Shariat, S. F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83
  • [28] Efficacy of Systemic Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients With Visceral Metastasis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis
    Yanagisawa, Takafumi
    Rajwa, Pawel
    Kawada, Tatsushi
    Mori, Keiichiro
    Fukuokaya, Wataru
    Petrov, Patrik
    Quhal, Fahad
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    von Deimling, Markus
    Bianchi, Alberto
    Majdoub, Muhammad
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Kramer, Gero
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Shariat, Shahrokh F. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 210 (03): : 416 - 429
  • [29] Safety and efficacy of Rituximab in systemic sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, Rui
    Yu, Jiangfan
    Shi, Yaqian
    Zou, Puyu
    Zeng, Zhuotong
    Tang, Bingsi
    Wang, Yaoyao
    Ling, Guanghui
    Luo, Mei
    Xiao, Rong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 83
  • [30] Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
    Fujii, Tomoko
    Belletti, Alessandro
    Carr, Anitra
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Luethi, Nora
    Putzu, Alessandro
    Sartini, Chiara
    Salanti, Georgia
    Tsujimoto, Yasushi
    Udy, Andrew A.
    Young, Paul J.
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):