Relationship between green public procurement criteria and sustainability assessment tools applied to office buildings

被引:32
|
作者
Braulio-Gonzalo, Marta [1 ]
Bovea, Maria D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, Dept Mech Engn & Construct, Av Sos Baynat S-N, Castellon de La Plana 12071, Spain
关键词
Green public procurement; Sustainable public procurement; Construction sector; Office buildings; Sustainable buildings;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106310
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green Public Procurement (GPP) plays an important role in facing the challenge of reducing the environmental impacts from construction sector-related products, services and works, and creating environmental and innovative value for society in favour of a greener and more sustainable economy. The European Commission recently developed GPP criteria for the "office buildings" category. In parallel, Building Sustainability Assessment (BSA) tools help estimate a building's impact on the environment based on a life cycle approach. Many of the aspects and measurable indicators included in BSA tools are clearly related to the criteria covered by GPP. However, other important ones are missing and should be integrated to ensure green procurement initiatives. This study critically reviews the GPP criteria proposed for office buildings and crosschecks them with the sustainability indicators included in three BSA tools to reinforce the GPP framework for the office buildings sector. It provides, on the one hand, an evaluation of the rate of improvement achieved in the tools when applying GPP criteria and, on the other, a proposal for a weighting system for awarding points to the offers in tenders. The results will help contracting authorities to introduce more objectivity into the tendering process and to make informed decisions while evaluating bidders' proposals.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prefabricated Envelope Green Remodeling Potential of Public Office Buildings in Korea
    Oh, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Sun Sook
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (07)
  • [32] Green public procurement model for environmental assessment of constructive systems
    Timm, Janaine F. Gaelzer
    Maciel, Vinicius Goncalves
    Passuello, Ana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23 (04) : 718 - 728
  • [33] Critical Review of the Material Criteria of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools
    Park, Jiyoung
    Yoon, Jungwon
    Kim, Kwang-Hyun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (02)
  • [34] An integrated method for the assessment of social sustainability in public-works procurement
    Montalban-Domingo, Laura
    Pellicer, Eugenio
    Garcia-Segura, Tatiana
    Sanz-Benlloch, Amalia
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 89
  • [35] Construction costs comparison between "green' and conventional office buildings
    Rehm, Michael
    Ade, Rochelle
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2013, 41 (02): : 198 - 208
  • [36] More Than a Nudge? Arguments and Tools for Mandating Green Public Procurement in the EU
    Melon, Lela
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [37] Green Public Procurement criteria for road marking materials from insiders? perspective
    Burghardt, Tomasz E.
    Pashkevich, Anton
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 298
  • [38] The Inclusion of a Sustainability Awareness Indicator in Assessment Tools for High School Buildings
    Saraiva, Tatiana Santos
    Almeida, Manuela
    Braganca, Luis
    Barbosa, Maria Teresa
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (02)
  • [39] Project performance indicators as an innovative tool for identifying sustainability perspectives in green public procurement
    Vatalis, Konstantinos I.
    Manoliadis, Odysseus G.
    Mavridis, Dimitrios G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ECONOMICS (ICOAE), 2012, 1 : 401 - 410
  • [40] Assessment of China’s Green Public Procurement Policy on Forest Products
    LI Zhiyong
    HE Youjun
    SU Haiying
    [J]. Chinese Forestry Science and Technology, 2012, 11 (03) : 1 - 13