Retrofitting Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS): A Cost-Benefit Analysis Appraisal

被引:8
|
作者
Oladunjoye, Oluwayemi [1 ]
Proverbs, David [2 ]
Xiao, Hong [3 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Sch Architecture Bldg & Civil Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[2] Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Sci & Engn, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England
[3] Birmingham City Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Birmingham B4 7XG, W Midlands, England
关键词
flooding; cost-benefit analysis; Willingness to Pay; return on investment; GREEN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/w14162521
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) are known to help mitigate flooding whilst simultaneously delivering other positive outcomes, such as the provision of environmental, economic, educational, and business benefits. Despite this, there has been a relatively low uptake of SuDS in new developments and even less of an uptake in the opportunities for retrofitting SuDS in existing buildings. A major barrier to uptake has been a lack of understanding regarding the value of the benefits provided by SuDS. This study presents an appraisal of the costs and benefits derived from the retrofitting of SuDS in existing buildings and reveals some of the key decision-making considerations during the design and installation of such schemes. A qualitative research approach that included a number of case studies of successfully retrofitted SuDS schemes within public buildings was conducted. A novel feature of the research was the use of the Willingness to Pay (WTP) approach to value the tangible and intangible benefits provided by the various schemes from the perspectives of the property owners. The findings revealed that the retrofit provided a net value to the client of over 100,000 pound over 10 years, a mean CBA ratio of 5.3/10, and a return on investment (ROI) that would be achieved in less than 3 years. The importance of stakeholder engagement during the decision-making process was highlighted in helping to overcome many of the design, installation, and maintenance challenges. The findings demonstrate a significant ROI for these SuDs retrofit schemes and highlight useful approaches to overcoming the barriers in valuing the importance of the intangible benefits. In supporting the uptake of the retrofitting of SuDS, it is recommended that these benefits are given full consideration by property owners, urban planners, and architects during the design of retrofit schemes and throughout the decision-making stage.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Urban Fire Stations Management
    Kang Canhua
    Wu Wei
    Yan Xi
    [J]. E-BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2011, 3 : 56 - +
  • [32] MATHEMATICAL MODELS AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN URBAN PLANNING
    FLOWERDE.AD
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 1968, 6 (05): : 393 - &
  • [33] A Multicriteria Planning Framework to Locate and Select Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) in Consolidated Urban Areas
    Jimenez Ariza, Sara Lucia
    Alejandro Martinez, Jose
    Felipe Munoz, Andres
    Pablo Quijano, Juan
    Pablo Rodriguez, Juan
    Alejandro Camacho, Luis
    Diaz-Granados, Mario
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [34] Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable sanitation systems in northern Chinese town: A case study
    Zhou, Lu
    Li, Jian
    [J]. Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2009, 49 (03): : 364 - 367
  • [35] Sustainable urban noise monitoring network with renewable bioenergy sources: An energy cost-benefit analysis
    Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro
    Maile, Naemi
    Estrada-Lopez, JohanJ.
    Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith
    Palma-Marrufo, Orlando
    Vazquez-Castillo, Javier
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2024, 111
  • [37] Reliability cost-benefit assessments in urban distribution systems planning
    Chowdhury, AA
    Custer, DE
    [J]. 2004 IEEE PES POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, VOLS 1 - 3, 2004, : 1335 - 1343
  • [38] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    [J]. NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [39] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    [J]. KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [40] HOW TO USE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN PROJECT APPRAISAL - FROST,MJ
    BASTABLE, CW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1976, 142 (02): : 96 - 96