Within family Mendelian randomization studies

被引:86
|
作者
Davies, Neil M. [1 ,2 ]
Howe, Laurence J. [1 ,2 ]
Brumpton, Ben [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Havdahl, Alexandra [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Evans, David M. [1 ,7 ]
Smith, George Davey [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Integrat Epidemiol Unit, MRC, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, Barley House, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, KG Jebsen Ctr Genet Epidemiol, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Clin Thorac & Occupat Med, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Lovisenberg Diaconal Hosp, Nic Waals Inst, Oslo, Norway
[6] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Mental Disorders, Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Queensland, Univ Queensland Diamantina Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
TRANSMISSION DISTORTION; COHORT PROFILE; MENTAL-HEALTH; ASSOCIATION; CHILD; DISEQUILIBRIUM; LINKAGE; TRAITS; COMMON; POWER;
D O I
10.1093/hmg/ddz204
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mendelian randomization (MR) is increasingly used to make causal inferences in a wide range of fields, from drug development to etiologic studies. Causal inference in MR is possible because of the process of genetic inheritance from parents to offspring. Specifically, at gamete formation and conception, meiosis ensures random allocation to the offspring of one allele from each parent at each locus, and these are unrelated to most of the other inherited genetic variants. To date, most MR studies have used data from unrelated individuals. These studies assume that genotypes are independent of the environment across a sample of unrelated individuals, conditional on covariates. Here we describe potential sources of bias, such as transmission ratio distortion, selection bias, population stratification, dynastic effects and assortative mating that can induce spurious or biased SNP-phenotype associations. We explain how studies of related individuals such as sibling pairs or parent-offspring trios can be used to overcome some of these sources of bias, to provide potentially more reliable evidence regarding causal processes. The increasing availability of data from related individuals in large cohort studies presents an opportunity to both overcome some of these biases and also to evaluate familial environmental effects.
引用
收藏
页码:R170 / R179
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer
    Markozannes, Georgios
    Kanellopoulou, Afroditi
    Dimopoulou, Olympia
    Kosmidis, Dimitrios
    Zhang, Xiaomeng
    Wang, Lijuan
    Theodoratou, Evropi
    Gill, Dipender
    Burgess, Stephen
    Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [32] Nonlinear Estimation Methods for Mendelian Randomization in Genetic Studies
    Cho, Youngjoo
    Auer, Paul L.
    Ghosh, Debashis
    [J]. SANKHYA-SERIES B-APPLIED AND INTERDISCIPLINARY STATISTICS, 2023,
  • [33] Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies
    Hemani, Gibran
    Bowden, Jack
    Smith, George Davey
    [J]. HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2018, 27 (R2) : R195 - R208
  • [34] Mendelian randomization studies of depression: evidence, opportunities, and challenges
    Wang-ran Ma
    Lei-lei Zhang
    Jing-ying Ma
    Fang Yu
    Ya-qing Hou
    Xiang-rui Feng
    Lin Yang
    [J]. Annals of General Psychiatry, 22
  • [35] A systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on multiple sclerosis
    Fazia, Teresa
    Baldrighi, Giulia Nicole
    Nova, Andrea
    Bernardinelli, Luisa
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (04) : 3172 - 3194
  • [36] Mendelian randomization studies of depression: evidence, opportunities, and challenges
    Ma, Wang-ran
    Zhang, Lei-lei
    Ma, Jing-ying
    Yu, Fang
    Hou, Ya-qing
    Feng, Xiang-rui
    Yang, Lin
    [J]. ANNALS OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [37] Cortisol and periodontitis: Prospective observational and Mendelian randomization studies
    Baumeister, Sebastian-Edgar
    Reckelkamm, Stefan Lars
    Grabe, Hans-Joergen
    Nauck, Matthias
    Klinger-Koenig, Johanna
    Voelzke, Henry
    Kocher, Thomas
    Friedrich, Nele
    Holtfreter, Birte
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [38] Mendelian Randomization Studies of Cancer Risk: a Literature Review
    Brandon L. Pierce
    Peter Kraft
    Chenan Zhang
    [J]. Current Epidemiology Reports, 2018, 5 : 184 - 196
  • [39] A note on the use of Egger regression in Mendelian randomization studies
    Slob, Eric A. W.
    Groenen, Patrick J. F.
    Thurik, A. Roy
    Rietveld, Cornelius A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (06) : 2094 - 2097
  • [40] Mendelian randomization studies of biomarkers and type 2 diabetes
    Abbasi, Ali
    [J]. ENDOCRINE CONNECTIONS, 2015, 4 (04) : 249 - 260