Within family Mendelian randomization studies

被引:86
|
作者
Davies, Neil M. [1 ,2 ]
Howe, Laurence J. [1 ,2 ]
Brumpton, Ben [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Havdahl, Alexandra [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Evans, David M. [1 ,7 ]
Smith, George Davey [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Integrat Epidemiol Unit, MRC, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, Barley House, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, KG Jebsen Ctr Genet Epidemiol, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Clin Thorac & Occupat Med, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Lovisenberg Diaconal Hosp, Nic Waals Inst, Oslo, Norway
[6] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Mental Disorders, Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Queensland, Univ Queensland Diamantina Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
TRANSMISSION DISTORTION; COHORT PROFILE; MENTAL-HEALTH; ASSOCIATION; CHILD; DISEQUILIBRIUM; LINKAGE; TRAITS; COMMON; POWER;
D O I
10.1093/hmg/ddz204
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mendelian randomization (MR) is increasingly used to make causal inferences in a wide range of fields, from drug development to etiologic studies. Causal inference in MR is possible because of the process of genetic inheritance from parents to offspring. Specifically, at gamete formation and conception, meiosis ensures random allocation to the offspring of one allele from each parent at each locus, and these are unrelated to most of the other inherited genetic variants. To date, most MR studies have used data from unrelated individuals. These studies assume that genotypes are independent of the environment across a sample of unrelated individuals, conditional on covariates. Here we describe potential sources of bias, such as transmission ratio distortion, selection bias, population stratification, dynastic effects and assortative mating that can induce spurious or biased SNP-phenotype associations. We explain how studies of related individuals such as sibling pairs or parent-offspring trios can be used to overcome some of these sources of bias, to provide potentially more reliable evidence regarding causal processes. The increasing availability of data from related individuals in large cohort studies presents an opportunity to both overcome some of these biases and also to evaluate familial environmental effects.
引用
收藏
页码:R170 / R179
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selection bias in the estimation of causal effects within family studies using Mendelian randomization
    Barry, Ciarrah-Jane
    Davies, Neil
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 712 - 712
  • [2] Mendelian randomization in family data
    Nathan J Morris
    Courtney Gray-McGuire
    Catherine M Stein
    [J]. BMC Proceedings, 3 (Suppl 7)
  • [3] Mendelian Randomization Studies in the Elderly
    Boef, Anna G. C.
    le Cessie, Saskia
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (02) : E15 - E16
  • [4] The causal effect of BMI on neurodevelopment: a within family Mendelian randomization study using MoBa
    Hughes, Amanda
    Morris, Tim
    Ayorech, Ziada
    Tesli, Martin
    Ask, Helga
    Askeland, Ragna
    Reichborn-Kjennerud, Ted
    Johansson, Stefan
    Andreassen, Ole
    Magnus, Per
    Helgeland, Oyvind
    Njolstad, Pal
    Smith, George Davey
    Davies, Neil
    Howe, Laura
    Havdahl, Alexandra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 50
  • [5] THE CAUSAL EFFECT OF BMI ON NEURODEVELOPMENT: A WITHIN FAMILY MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION STUDY USING MOBA
    Hughes, A. M.
    Ask, H.
    Tesli, T.
    Askeland, R. B.
    Reichborn-Kjennerud, T.
    Andreassen, O.
    Helgeland, O.
    Njolstad, P.
    Davies, N. M.
    Havdahl, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2020, 74 : A44 - A45
  • [6] Standardizing the reporting of Mendelian randomization studies
    Yeung, Shiu Lun Au
    Gill, Dipender
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [7] A Guide to Understanding Mendelian Randomization Studies
    Nguyen, Kevin
    Mitchell, Braxton D.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [8] Standardizing the reporting of Mendelian randomization studies
    Shiu Lun Au Yeung
    Dipender Gill
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 21
  • [9] Recent Developments in Mendelian Randomization Studies
    Jie Zheng
    Denis Baird
    Maria-Carolina Borges
    Jack Bowden
    Gibran Hemani
    Philip Haycock
    David M. Evans
    George Davey Smith
    [J]. Current Epidemiology Reports, 2017, 4 (4) : 330 - 345
  • [10] Managing the Exponential Growth of Mendelian Randomization Studies
    Munafo, Marcus
    Brown, Jamie
    Hefler, Marita
    Davey Smith, George
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (10) : 1273 - 1275