What drives general practitioners in the UK to improve the quality of care? A systematic literature review

被引:17
|
作者
Ahmed, Kanwal [1 ]
Hashim, Salma [1 ]
Khankhara, Mariyam [1 ]
Said, Ilhan [1 ]
Shandakumar, Amrita Tara [2 ]
Zaman, Sadia [1 ]
Veiga, Andre [3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Business Sch, London, England
关键词
financial incentives; pay for performance; general practice; quality improvement; primary care; PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; UNITED-KINGDOM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001127
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn the UK, the National Health Service has various incentivisation schemes in place to improve the provision of high-quality care. The Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) and other Pay for Performance (P4P) schemes are incentive frameworks that focus on meeting predetermined clinical outcomes. However, the ability of these schemes to meet their aims is debated.Objectives(1) To explore current incentive schemes available in general practice in the UK, their impact and effectiveness in improving quality of care and (2) To identify other types of incentives discussed in the literature.MethodsThis systematic literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Six databases were searched: Cochrane, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, Health Management Information Consortium, Embase and Health Management. Articles were screened according to the selection criteria, evaluated against critical appraisal checklists and categorised into themes.Results35 articles were included from an initial search result of 22087. Articles were categorised into the following three overarching themes: financial incentives, non-financial incentives and competition.DiscussionThe majority of the literature focused on QOF. Its positive effects included reduced mortality rates, better data recording and improved sociodemographic inequalities. However, limitations involved decreased quality of care in non-incentivised activities, poor patient experiences due to tick-box exercises and increased pressure to meet non-specific targets. Findings surrounding competition were mixed, with limited evidence found on the use of non-financial incentives in primary care.ConclusionCurrent research looks extensively into financial incentives, however, we propose more research into the effects of intrinsic motivation alongside existing P4P schemes to enhance motivation and improve quality of care.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature
    De Vos, Maartje
    Graafmans, Wilco
    Kooistra, Mieneke
    Meijboom, Bert
    Van Der Voort, Peter
    Westert, Gert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 21 (02) : 119 - 129
  • [42] Audit and feedback, and continuous quality improvement strategies to improve the quality of care for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of literature
    Vecchi, Simona
    Agabiti, Nera
    Mitrova, Suzana
    Cacciani, Laura
    Amato, Laura
    Davoli, Marina
    Bargagli, Anna Maria
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2016, 40 (3-4): : 215 - 223
  • [43] INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE PRESCRIBING QUALITY IN CARE HOMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Loganathan, M.
    Singh, S.
    Bottle, Alex
    Franklin, B. D.
    Majeed, A.
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2010, 64 : A43 - A44
  • [44] Task shifting from general practitioners to other health professionals in out-of-hours primary care - a systematic literature review on content and quality of task shifting
    Bomholt, Katrine Bjornshave
    Nebsbjerg, Mette Amalie
    Burau, Viola
    Mygind, Anna
    Christensen, Morten Bondo
    Huibers, Linda
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2024, 30 (01)
  • [45] Recruitment and retention of general practitioners in the UK: what are the problems and solutions?
    Young, R
    Leese, B
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1999, 49 (447): : 829 - 833
  • [46] The impact of the quality of communication from nephrologists to primary care practitioners: a literature review
    Jiwa, Moyez
    Chakera, Aron
    Dadich, Ann
    Ossolinski, Gemma
    Hewitt, Vivien
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2014, 30 (10) : 2093 - 2101
  • [47] CARE FOR THE QUALITY OF A GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS WORK
    MAJHEN, J
    ZDRAVSTVENI VESTNIK, 1988, 57 (02): : 51 - 53
  • [48] Does tonsillectomy improve quality of life in adults? A systematic literature review
    Andreou, N.
    Hadjisymeou, S.
    Panesar, J.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2013, 127 (04): : 332 - 338
  • [49] Increasing the chance of dying at home: roles, tasks and approaches of general practitioners enabling palliative care: a systematic review of qualitative literature
    Shangavi Balasundram
    Anne Holm
    Kirstine Skov Benthien
    Frans Boch Waldorff
    Susanne Reventlow
    Gritt Overbeck
    BMC Primary Care, 24
  • [50] Increasing the chance of dying at home: roles, tasks and approaches of general practitioners enabling palliative care: a systematic review of qualitative literature
    Balasundram, Shangavi
    Holm, Anne
    Benthien, Kirstine Skov
    Waldorff, Frans Boch
    Reventlow, Susanne
    Overbeck, Gritt
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2023, 24 (01):