What drives general practitioners in the UK to improve the quality of care? A systematic literature review

被引:17
|
作者
Ahmed, Kanwal [1 ]
Hashim, Salma [1 ]
Khankhara, Mariyam [1 ]
Said, Ilhan [1 ]
Shandakumar, Amrita Tara [2 ]
Zaman, Sadia [1 ]
Veiga, Andre [3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Business Sch, London, England
关键词
financial incentives; pay for performance; general practice; quality improvement; primary care; PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; UNITED-KINGDOM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001127
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn the UK, the National Health Service has various incentivisation schemes in place to improve the provision of high-quality care. The Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) and other Pay for Performance (P4P) schemes are incentive frameworks that focus on meeting predetermined clinical outcomes. However, the ability of these schemes to meet their aims is debated.Objectives(1) To explore current incentive schemes available in general practice in the UK, their impact and effectiveness in improving quality of care and (2) To identify other types of incentives discussed in the literature.MethodsThis systematic literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Six databases were searched: Cochrane, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, Health Management Information Consortium, Embase and Health Management. Articles were screened according to the selection criteria, evaluated against critical appraisal checklists and categorised into themes.Results35 articles were included from an initial search result of 22087. Articles were categorised into the following three overarching themes: financial incentives, non-financial incentives and competition.DiscussionThe majority of the literature focused on QOF. Its positive effects included reduced mortality rates, better data recording and improved sociodemographic inequalities. However, limitations involved decreased quality of care in non-incentivised activities, poor patient experiences due to tick-box exercises and increased pressure to meet non-specific targets. Findings surrounding competition were mixed, with limited evidence found on the use of non-financial incentives in primary care.ConclusionCurrent research looks extensively into financial incentives, however, we propose more research into the effects of intrinsic motivation alongside existing P4P schemes to enhance motivation and improve quality of care.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does Deprescribing Improve Quality of Life? A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Jennifer A. Pruskowski
    Sydney Springer
    Carolyn T. Thorpe
    Michele Klein-Fedyshin
    Steven M. Handler
    Drugs & Aging, 2019, 36 : 1097 - 1110
  • [32] Does Deprescribing Improve Quality of Life? A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Pruskowski, Jennifer A.
    Springer, Sydney
    Thorpe, Carolyn T.
    Klein-Fedyshin, Michele
    Handler, Steven M.
    DRUGS & AGING, 2019, 36 (12) : 1097 - 1110
  • [33] WHAT DRIVES THE REVISIT INTENTION OF HERITAGE HOTEL CONSUMERS? A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Dhewi, Titis Shinta
    Narmaditya, Bagus Shandy
    Mukhlis, Imam
    Ridzuan, Abdul Rahim
    TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT-CROATIA, 2024, 30 (02): : 239 - 247
  • [34] What Drives Paid Search Success? A Systematic Literature Review Completed Research
    Schlangenotto, Darius
    Poniatowski, Martin
    Kundisch, Dennis
    AMCIS 2018 PROCEEDINGS, 2018,
  • [35] Systematic review protocol of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
    Murray M.
    Murray L.
    Donnelly M.
    Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
  • [36] New contract for general practitioners - A bold initiative to improve quality of care, but implementation will be difficult
    Shekelle, P
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7387): : 457 - 458
  • [37] Barriers and Facilitators for General Practitioners to Engage in Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review
    De Vleminck, Aline
    Houttekier, Dirk
    Pardon, Koen
    Deschepper, Reginald
    Van Audenhove, Chantal
    Vanderstichele, Robert
    Deliens, Luc
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2014, 30 (03) : 222 - 223
  • [38] Education of general practitioners in the use of point-of-care ultrasonography: a systematic review
    Andersen, Camilla Aakjaer
    Hedegard, Henriette Sav
    Lokkegaard, Thomas
    Frolund, Joachim
    Jensen, Martin Bach
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 38 (04) : 484 - 494
  • [39] How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review
    Mitchell, GK
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2002, 16 (06) : 457 - 464
  • [40] Barriers and facilitators for general practitioners to engage in advance care planning: A systematic review
    De Vleminck, Aline
    Houttekier, Dirk
    Pardon, Koen
    Deschepper, Reginald
    Van Audenhove, Chantal
    Vander Stichele, Robert
    Deliens, Luc
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2013, 31 (04) : 215 - 226