What drives general practitioners in the UK to improve the quality of care? A systematic literature review

被引:17
|
作者
Ahmed, Kanwal [1 ]
Hashim, Salma [1 ]
Khankhara, Mariyam [1 ]
Said, Ilhan [1 ]
Shandakumar, Amrita Tara [2 ]
Zaman, Sadia [1 ]
Veiga, Andre [3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Business Sch, London, England
关键词
financial incentives; pay for performance; general practice; quality improvement; primary care; PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; UNITED-KINGDOM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001127
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn the UK, the National Health Service has various incentivisation schemes in place to improve the provision of high-quality care. The Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) and other Pay for Performance (P4P) schemes are incentive frameworks that focus on meeting predetermined clinical outcomes. However, the ability of these schemes to meet their aims is debated.Objectives(1) To explore current incentive schemes available in general practice in the UK, their impact and effectiveness in improving quality of care and (2) To identify other types of incentives discussed in the literature.MethodsThis systematic literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Six databases were searched: Cochrane, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, Health Management Information Consortium, Embase and Health Management. Articles were screened according to the selection criteria, evaluated against critical appraisal checklists and categorised into themes.Results35 articles were included from an initial search result of 22087. Articles were categorised into the following three overarching themes: financial incentives, non-financial incentives and competition.DiscussionThe majority of the literature focused on QOF. Its positive effects included reduced mortality rates, better data recording and improved sociodemographic inequalities. However, limitations involved decreased quality of care in non-incentivised activities, poor patient experiences due to tick-box exercises and increased pressure to meet non-specific targets. Findings surrounding competition were mixed, with limited evidence found on the use of non-financial incentives in primary care.ConclusionCurrent research looks extensively into financial incentives, however, we propose more research into the effects of intrinsic motivation alongside existing P4P schemes to enhance motivation and improve quality of care.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lecturer practitioners in UK nursing and midwifery: what is the evidence? A systematic review of the research literature
    Williamson, GR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2004, 13 (07) : 787 - 795
  • [2] Psychosocial care for cancer survivors: A systematic literature review on the role of general practitioners
    Deckx, Laura
    Chow, Ka Hei
    Askew, Deborah
    van Driel, Mieke L.
    Mitchell, Geoffrey K.
    van den Akker, Marjan
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 (04) : 444 - 454
  • [3] The effect of feedback to general practitioners on quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of the literature
    Trine Lignell Guldberg
    Torsten Lauritzen
    Jette Kolding Kristensen
    Peter Vedsted
    BMC Family Practice, 10
  • [4] The effect of feedback to general practitioners on quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of the literature
    Guldberg, Trine Lignell
    Lauritzen, Torsten
    Kristensen, Jette Kolding
    Vedsted, Peter
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2009, 10
  • [5] How can General practitioners improve the quality of their care?
    Deter, H. C.
    Dilg, R.
    Mitzenegg, P.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2018, 109 : 98 - 98
  • [6] General practitioners in palliative care in Germany: a systematic review
    Becka, D.
    Riese, A.
    Rychlik, R. P. T.
    Huenges, B.
    Rusche, H.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2014, 139 (44) : 2254 - 2258
  • [7] A Systematic Review of Training to Improve Melanoma Diagnostic Skills in General Practitioners
    Chia, Alvin
    Trevena, Lyndal
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2016, 31 (04) : 730 - 735
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Training to Improve Melanoma Diagnostic Skills in General Practitioners
    Alvin Chia
    Lyndal Trevena
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2016, 31 : 730 - 735
  • [9] What is the cost of palliative care in the UK? A systematic review
    Gardiner, Clare
    Ryan, Tony
    Gott, Merryn
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 8 (03) : 250 - 257
  • [10] Contemporary Educational Interventions for General Practitioners (GPs) in Primary Care Settings in Australia: A Systematic Literature Review
    Bernardes, Christina Maresch
    Ratnasekera, Isanka Umayangani
    Kwon, Joo Hyun
    Somasundaram, Sivagowri
    Mitchell, Geoff
    Shahid, Shaouli
    Meiklejohn, Judith
    Beirne, James O. '
    Valery, Patricia Casarolli
    Powell, Elizabeth
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 7