Comparison of 2D and 3D representations for visualising telecommunication usage

被引:12
|
作者
Hicks, M [1 ]
O'Malley, C
Nichols, S
Anderson, B
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Mech Mat Mfg Engn & Management, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Univ Essex, Inst Sociotech Innovat & Res, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0144929031000117080
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper describes an empirical evaluation of one two-dimensional (2D), and two three-dimensional (3D) representations. These representations were developed to present customer behaviour information on telecommunications usage. The goal of the study was to investigate how the properties of these different but informationally equivalent representations supported information retrieval and problem solving using the database. Thirty-six participants performed a number of information retrieval and problem solving tasks, in one of three experimental conditions: 2D graph, 3D graph and 3D helix plot. Measures included performance time and accuracy and user attitudes concerning the usability of the displays. Despite certain navigational problems associated with the 2D representation, the results indicated a performance advantage for the 2D display compared with both 3D representations. Generally, the analyses revealed that the differences in representational characteristics have a significant effect on the level of cognitive effort required to perform the tasks.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:185 / 201
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automation of 2D and 3D bridge deck representations based on a geometric database
    Sampaio, AA
    DEVELOPMENTS IN ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2000, : 43 - 50
  • [42] TBC and PML conditions for 2D and 3D BPM: a comparison
    F. Fogli
    G. Bellanca
    P. Bassi
    Optical and Quantum Electronics, 1998, 30 : 443 - 456
  • [43] Unit Contact Representations of Grid Subgraphs with Regular Polytopes in 2D and 3D
    Kleist, Linda
    Rahman, Benjamin
    GRAPH DRAWING (GD 2014), 2014, 8871 : 137 - 148
  • [44] Quantitative comparison of 3D and 2D PET with brain studies
    Sossi, V
    Oakes, TR
    Chan, G
    Ruth, TJ
    1997 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM - CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1 & 2, 1998, : 1438 - 1441
  • [45] A comparison of 2D and 3D brain FDG-PET.
    Lee, JR
    Choi, Y
    Kim, SE
    Lee, KH
    Choe, YS
    Shin, SA
    Kim, BT
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1996, 37 (05) : 1023 - 1023
  • [46] Comparison of muscle function in 2D and 3D walking simulations
    Xiao, Ming
    Higginson, Jill
    PROCEEDING OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2007, 2007, : 15 - 16
  • [47] 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison
    Berssenbruegge, Philipp
    Berlin, Nina Franka
    Kebeck, Guenther
    Runte, Christoph
    Jung, Susanne
    Kleinheinz, Johannes
    Dirksen, Dieter
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (06) : E327 - E334
  • [48] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
    Li Chunhui
    Pan Xishan
    Ke Jie
    Dong Xiaotian
    POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
  • [49] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D WELDING SIMULATIONS OF A SIMPLE PLATE
    Dewees, David J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP 2012, VOL 2, 2012, : 273 - 281
  • [50] Comparison of 2D and 3D myocardial PET imaging.
    Knesaurek, K
    Machac, J
    Krynyckyi, BR
    Almeida, OD
    Parisi, JC
    Kim, CK
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 42 (05) : 46P - 46P