Comparison of 2D and 3D representations for visualising telecommunication usage

被引:12
|
作者
Hicks, M [1 ]
O'Malley, C
Nichols, S
Anderson, B
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Mech Mat Mfg Engn & Management, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Univ Essex, Inst Sociotech Innovat & Res, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0144929031000117080
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper describes an empirical evaluation of one two-dimensional (2D), and two three-dimensional (3D) representations. These representations were developed to present customer behaviour information on telecommunications usage. The goal of the study was to investigate how the properties of these different but informationally equivalent representations supported information retrieval and problem solving using the database. Thirty-six participants performed a number of information retrieval and problem solving tasks, in one of three experimental conditions: 2D graph, 3D graph and 3D helix plot. Measures included performance time and accuracy and user attitudes concerning the usability of the displays. Despite certain navigational problems associated with the 2D representation, the results indicated a performance advantage for the 2D display compared with both 3D representations. Generally, the analyses revealed that the differences in representational characteristics have a significant effect on the level of cognitive effort required to perform the tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 201
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    [J]. Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248
  • [32] 2D and 3D on demand
    Philippi, Anne
    [J]. F & M; Feinwerktechnik, Mikrotechnik, Messtechnik, 1998, 106 (06): : 412 - 414
  • [33] 21/2D or 3D?
    Roth, S
    Küster, B
    Sura, H
    [J]. KUNSTSTOFFE-PLAST EUROPE, 2004, 94 (07): : 65 - 67
  • [34] Learning Internal Representations of 3D Transformations From 2D Projected Inputs
    Connor, Marissa
    Olshausen, Bruno
    Rozell, Christopher
    [J]. Neural Computation, 2024, 36 (11) : 2505 - 2539
  • [35] Comparison of Traditional 2D and Virtual Patterns Design in 3D
    Cichocka, Agnieszka
    Bruniaux, Pascal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATICS, 2009, 13 (05) : 542 - 549
  • [36] TBC and PML conditions for 2D and 3D BPM: a comparison
    Fogli, F
    Bellanca, G
    Bassi, P
    [J]. OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, 1998, 30 (5-6) : 443 - 456
  • [37] A comparison of 2D and 3D PIV measurements in an oblique jet
    M. Abe
    E. K. Longmire
    K. Hishida
    M. Maeda
    [J]. Journal of Visualization, 2000, 3 (2) : 165 - 173
  • [38] From 2D to 3D
    Steven De Feyter
    [J]. Nature Chemistry, 2011, 3 (1) : 14 - 15
  • [39] A Comparison Study of 2D and 3D ITU Channel Model
    Almesaeed, Reham
    Ameen, Araz S.
    Doufexi, Angela
    Dahnoun, Naim
    Nix, Andrew R.
    [J]. 2013 IFIP WIRELESS DAYS (WD), 2013,
  • [40] Comparison of 2D and 3D Composites to Confined Crush Loading
    Pankow, M.
    Yen, C. F.
    Waas, A. M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR COMPOSITES, 2013,