Quality Indicators for Safe Medication Preparation and Administration: A Systematic Review

被引:38
|
作者
Smeulers, Marian [1 ]
Verweij, Lotte [1 ]
Maaskant, Jolanda M. [2 ,3 ]
de Boer, Monica [4 ]
Krediet, C. T. Paul [5 ]
van Dijkum, Els J. M. Nieveen [6 ]
Vermeulen, Hester [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Qual Assurance & Proc Innovat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Emma Childrens Hosp, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Fac Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol Biostat & Bioinformat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Hosp Pharm, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Amsterdam Sch Hlth Profess, Dept Nursing, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH-CARE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0122695
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background One-third of all medication errors causing harm to hospitalized patients occur in the medication preparation and administration phase, which is predominantly a nursing activity. To monitor, evaluate and improve the quality and safety of this process, evidence-based quality indicators can be used. Objectives The aim of study was to identify evidence-based quality indicators (structure, process and outcome) for safe in-hospital medication preparation and administration. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for relevant studies published up to January 2015. Additionally, nine databases were searched to identify relevant grey literature. Two reviewers independently selected studies if (1) the method for quality indicator development combined a literature search with expert panel opinion, (2) the study contained quality indicators on medication safety, and (3) any of the quality indicators were applicable to hospital medication preparation and administration. A multidisciplinary team appraised the studies independently using the AIRE instrument, which contains four domains and 20 items. Quality indicators applicable to in-hospital medication preparation and administration were extracted using a structured form. Results The search identified 1683 studies, of which 64 were reviewed in detail and five met the inclusion criteria. Overall, according to the AIRE domains, all studies were clear on purpose; most of them applied stakeholder involvement and used evidence reasonably; usage of the indicator in practice was scarcely described. A total of 21 quality indicators were identified: 5 structure indicators (e.g. safety management and high alert medication), 11 process indicators (e.g. verification and protocols) and 5 outcome indicators (e.g. harm and death). These quality indicators partially cover the 7 rights. Conclusion Despite the relatively small number of included studies, the identified quality indicators can serve as an excellent starting point for further development of nursing specific quality indicators for medication safety. Especially on the right patient, right route, right time and right documentation there is room future development of quality indicators.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review of multidisciplinary colorectal cancer quality indicators
    Donnelly, Candice
    Or, Michelle
    Thevaraja, Mathushan
    Chiew, Kim-Lin
    Vinod, Shalini
    Toh, James
    Sundaresan, Puma
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 147 - 147
  • [32] Quality indicators for responsible use of medicines: a systematic review
    Fujita, Kenji
    Moles, Rebekah J.
    Chen, Timothy F.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [33] Quality indicators for community dementia care: a systematic review
    Dequanter, Samantha
    Buyl, Ronald
    Fobelets, Maaike
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30 (05): : 879 - 885
  • [34] Quality indicators for hip fracture care, a systematic review
    Voeten, S. C.
    Krijnen, P.
    Voeten, D. M.
    Hegeman, J. H.
    Wouters, M. W. J. M.
    Schipper, I. B.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 29 (09) : 1963 - 1985
  • [35] Quality indicators for hip fracture care, a systematic review
    S.C. Voeten
    P. Krijnen
    D.M. Voeten
    J.H. Hegeman
    M.W.J.M. Wouters
    I.B. Schipper
    Osteoporosis International, 2018, 29 : 1963 - 1985
  • [36] Quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review
    Edwards, J. J.
    Khanna, M.
    Jordan, K. P.
    Jordan, J. L.
    Bedson, J.
    Dziedzic, K. S.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2015, 74 (03) : 490 - 498
  • [37] A Systematic Review of Quantitative Methods for Evaluating Electronic Medication Administration Record and Bar-Coded Medication Administration Usability
    Pruitt, Zoe M.
    Kazi, Sadaf
    Weir, Charlene
    Taft, Teresa
    Busog, Deanna-Nicole
    Ratwani, Raj
    Hettinger, Aaron Z.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 14 (01): : 185 - 198
  • [38] Using pictograms to assist caregivers in liquid medication administration: a systematic review
    Chan, H. K.
    Hassali, M. A.
    Lim, C. J.
    Saleeem, F.
    Tan, W. L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 40 (03) : 266 - 272
  • [39] Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: a systematic review
    Koyama, Alain K.
    Maddox, Claire-Sophie Sheridan
    Li, Ling
    Bucknall, Tracey
    Westbrook, Johanna, I
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2020, 29 (07) : 595 - 603
  • [40] A systematic review of nursing administration of medication via enteral tubes in adults
    Phillips, Nicole M.
    Nay, Rhonda
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2008, 17 (17) : 2257 - 2265