Quality Indicators for Safe Medication Preparation and Administration: A Systematic Review

被引:38
|
作者
Smeulers, Marian [1 ]
Verweij, Lotte [1 ]
Maaskant, Jolanda M. [2 ,3 ]
de Boer, Monica [4 ]
Krediet, C. T. Paul [5 ]
van Dijkum, Els J. M. Nieveen [6 ]
Vermeulen, Hester [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Qual Assurance & Proc Innovat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Emma Childrens Hosp, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Fac Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol Biostat & Bioinformat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Hosp Pharm, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Amsterdam Sch Hlth Profess, Dept Nursing, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH-CARE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0122695
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background One-third of all medication errors causing harm to hospitalized patients occur in the medication preparation and administration phase, which is predominantly a nursing activity. To monitor, evaluate and improve the quality and safety of this process, evidence-based quality indicators can be used. Objectives The aim of study was to identify evidence-based quality indicators (structure, process and outcome) for safe in-hospital medication preparation and administration. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for relevant studies published up to January 2015. Additionally, nine databases were searched to identify relevant grey literature. Two reviewers independently selected studies if (1) the method for quality indicator development combined a literature search with expert panel opinion, (2) the study contained quality indicators on medication safety, and (3) any of the quality indicators were applicable to hospital medication preparation and administration. A multidisciplinary team appraised the studies independently using the AIRE instrument, which contains four domains and 20 items. Quality indicators applicable to in-hospital medication preparation and administration were extracted using a structured form. Results The search identified 1683 studies, of which 64 were reviewed in detail and five met the inclusion criteria. Overall, according to the AIRE domains, all studies were clear on purpose; most of them applied stakeholder involvement and used evidence reasonably; usage of the indicator in practice was scarcely described. A total of 21 quality indicators were identified: 5 structure indicators (e.g. safety management and high alert medication), 11 process indicators (e.g. verification and protocols) and 5 outcome indicators (e.g. harm and death). These quality indicators partially cover the 7 rights. Conclusion Despite the relatively small number of included studies, the identified quality indicators can serve as an excellent starting point for further development of nursing specific quality indicators for medication safety. Especially on the right patient, right route, right time and right documentation there is room future development of quality indicators.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Systematic Review of Patients' Perspectives on the Subcutaneous Route of Medication Administration
    Ridyard, Colin H.
    Dawoud, Dalia M. M.
    Tuersley, Lorna V.
    Hughes, Dyfrig A.
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (04): : 281 - 292
  • [22] Carers' Medication Administration Errors in the Domiciliary Setting: A Systematic Review
    Parand, Anam
    Garfield, Sara
    Vincent, Charles
    Franklin, Bryony Dean
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [23] Systematic literature review of hospital medication administration errors in children
    Ameer, Ahmed
    Dhillon, Soraya
    Peters, Mark J.
    Ghaleb, Maisoon
    INTEGRATED PHARMACY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2015, 4 : 153 - 165
  • [24] A Systematic Review of Patients’ Perspectives on the Subcutaneous Route of Medication Administration
    Colin H. Ridyard
    Dalia M. M. Dawoud
    Lorna V. Tuersley
    Dyfrig A. Hughes
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2016, 9 : 281 - 292
  • [25] Interventions to support safe medication administration by emergency department nurses: An integrative review
    Millichamp, Tracey
    Johnston, Amy N. B.
    INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2020, 49
  • [26] Quality indicators for breast cancer care: A systematic review
    Maes-Carballo, Marta
    Gomez-Fandino, Yolanda
    Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla
    Estrada-Lopez, Carlos Roberto
    Martin-Diaz, Manuel
    Khan, Khalid Saeed
    Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
    BREAST, 2021, 59 : 221 - 231
  • [27] Quality Indicators in Surgical Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
    Lee, Katherine C.
    Sokas, Claire M.
    Streid, Jocelyn
    Senglaub, Steven S.
    Coogan, Kathleen
    Walling, Anne M.
    Cooper, Zara
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 62 (03) : 545 - 558
  • [28] Quality Indicators for Palliative Care: Update of a Systematic Review
    De Roo, Maaike L.
    Leemans, Kathleen
    Claessen, Susanne J. J.
    Cohen, Joachim
    Pasman, H. Roeline W.
    Deliens, Luc
    Francke, Anneke L.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 46 (04) : 556 - 572
  • [29] Quality Indicators in the Clinical Specialty of Urology: A Systematic Review
    Koh, Harvey Jia Wei
    Whitelock-Wainwright, Emma
    Gasevic, Dragan
    Rankin, David
    Romero, Lorena
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Evans, Sue
    Talic, Stella
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (03): : 435 - 446
  • [30] Quality Indicators in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Kennedy, Angeliki
    Bakir, Christina
    Brauer, Carmen A.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (04) : 1124 - 1132