Quality Indicators for Safe Medication Preparation and Administration: A Systematic Review

被引:38
|
作者
Smeulers, Marian [1 ]
Verweij, Lotte [1 ]
Maaskant, Jolanda M. [2 ,3 ]
de Boer, Monica [4 ]
Krediet, C. T. Paul [5 ]
van Dijkum, Els J. M. Nieveen [6 ]
Vermeulen, Hester [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Qual Assurance & Proc Innovat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Emma Childrens Hosp, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Fac Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol Biostat & Bioinformat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Hosp Pharm, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Amsterdam Sch Hlth Profess, Dept Nursing, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH-CARE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0122695
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background One-third of all medication errors causing harm to hospitalized patients occur in the medication preparation and administration phase, which is predominantly a nursing activity. To monitor, evaluate and improve the quality and safety of this process, evidence-based quality indicators can be used. Objectives The aim of study was to identify evidence-based quality indicators (structure, process and outcome) for safe in-hospital medication preparation and administration. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for relevant studies published up to January 2015. Additionally, nine databases were searched to identify relevant grey literature. Two reviewers independently selected studies if (1) the method for quality indicator development combined a literature search with expert panel opinion, (2) the study contained quality indicators on medication safety, and (3) any of the quality indicators were applicable to hospital medication preparation and administration. A multidisciplinary team appraised the studies independently using the AIRE instrument, which contains four domains and 20 items. Quality indicators applicable to in-hospital medication preparation and administration were extracted using a structured form. Results The search identified 1683 studies, of which 64 were reviewed in detail and five met the inclusion criteria. Overall, according to the AIRE domains, all studies were clear on purpose; most of them applied stakeholder involvement and used evidence reasonably; usage of the indicator in practice was scarcely described. A total of 21 quality indicators were identified: 5 structure indicators (e.g. safety management and high alert medication), 11 process indicators (e.g. verification and protocols) and 5 outcome indicators (e.g. harm and death). These quality indicators partially cover the 7 rights. Conclusion Despite the relatively small number of included studies, the identified quality indicators can serve as an excellent starting point for further development of nursing specific quality indicators for medication safety. Especially on the right patient, right route, right time and right documentation there is room future development of quality indicators.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Designing a safe system of prescription, preparation and administration for the cystostatic medication
    Ruiz Fuentes, Salvador
    Belda Rustarazo, Susana
    Medarde Caballero, Catalina
    Fernandez Lopez, Cristina
    Gomez Pena, Celia
    Fernandez Cristina, Garcia
    Ortiz Navarrete, Rocio
    Moron Romero, Rocio
    Gonzalez Medina, M. Carmen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2015, 37 (01) : 253 - 253
  • [2] Safe medication administration
    McIntyre, Lora J.
    Courey, Tamra J.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2007, 22 (01) : 40 - 42
  • [3] Healthcare quality indicators - a systematic review
    Yildiz, Ozkan
    Demirors, Onur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2014, 27 (03) : 209 - 222
  • [4] Hospital quality indicators: a systematic review
    Breyer, Juliana Zeni
    Giacomazzi, Juliana
    Kuhmmer, Regina
    Lima, Karine Margarites
    Hammes, Luciano Serpa
    Ribeiro, Rodrigo Antonini
    Kops, Natalia Luiza
    Falavigna, Maicon
    Wendland, Eliana Marcia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2019, 32 (02) : 474 - 487
  • [5] Electronic Medication Administration System Supports Safe Medication Administration
    Santavirta, Jenni
    Kuusisto, Anne
    Saranto, Kaija
    Suominen, Tarja
    Asikainen, Paula
    DIGITAL PERSONALIZED HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2020, 270 : 1267 - 1268
  • [6] Quality Indicators to Medication Review Services: Evaluation of the Structure
    Santos-Junior, Genival A.
    Marques, Tatiane C.
    Silva, Rafaella O. S.
    Silvestre, Carina C.
    Lyra, Divaldo P., Jr.
    Silva, Francilene A.
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 2015, 34 (06): : 1172 - 1179
  • [7] Technology and Safe Medication Administration
    Crawford, Mark
    JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2005, 28 : 37 - 38
  • [8] Making Medication Administration Safe
    Burke, Kathleen G.
    Mason, Diana J.
    Alexander, Mary
    Barnsteiner, Jane H.
    Rich, Victoria L.
    JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2005, 28 : 2 - +
  • [9] Engaging Nursing Students in Quality Improvement: Teaching Safe Medication Administration
    Wagner, Elissa A.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2022, 61 (05) : 268 - 271
  • [10] Registered Nurses' medication administration skills: a systematic review
    Luokkamaki, Sanna
    Harkanen, Marja
    Saano, Susanna
    Vehvilainen-Julkunen, Katri
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2021, 35 (01) : 37 - 54